Talk:History of Test cricket from 1877 to 1883

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
History of Test cricket from 1877 to 1883 is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Featured article FA This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Featured article star History of Test cricket from 1877 to 1883 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
February 11, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted

Contents

[edit] A very detailed account of the 1882 Ashes Match

I have the resources (newspaper articles, reconstructions, biographies, autobiographies and tour books) available to provide an almost ball-by-ball account of the 1882 Test Match at The Oval. I've written a rather long introduction to it on the page concerned (although it could be a lot longer), and I would like to know if I have leave to go ahead with what will probably be a bit of an overkill. Cheers, Robertson-Glasgow 08:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't think that any one individual is in a position to say that you should or you shouldn't - it's really a question of consensus. For anything much longer than what we have now, it might be best to write a separate article with a suitable title and link to it from this one (and also link to it from The Ashes). Oh, and welcome to Wiki, which I guess was my doing. :) I like your choice of user name. It was I who wrote the first draft of the Wiki article for him. JH 20:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, JH. Great man, "Crusoe", wasn't he? (I just hope that you know that I am talking about good old Raymond Charles Robertson-Glasgow, cricket-writer extraordinaire. I'll leave it to him to tell of how he got the nickname "Crusoe": '[In the match in 1920 in which Oxford beat Essex] Charlie McGahey and A. C. Russell had put on some 60 runs at the start of their second innings when I bowled McGahey with a full pitcher, which he later referred to as a yorker. In the bowels of the pavilion, Johnny Douglas, the Essex captain, asked him how he was out, and McGahey answered: 'I was bowled by an old [censored] I thought was dead two thousand years ago, called Robinson Crusoe.'" Cheers, Robertson-Glasgow 08:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
IMHO, it could be trimmed a bit because the intro is much longer than the description of actual play. Tintin (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, the intro was meant to be a bit of a sample of how detailed the piece was going to be. Cheers, Robertson-Glasgow 08:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi there kids, I'm new to this caper but I simply had to cast doubt on the account of the second test match. Whomsoever wrote it seemed to think that Hill was playing for Australia while the scorecard shows that he not only played for Lillywhite's XI but did not take the first two wickets in that team's first innings - I mean, how could he have done so while sitting, padded up in the pavilion? Regards 165.12.252.11 03:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Baxter de Wahl

[edit] A new Ashes book

Does anyone have or know anything about Christopher Hilton's "The Birth of the Ashes: The Amazing Story of the First Ashes Test" (Breedon Books, Oct 2006)? Apparently there's a lot of groundbreaking research that went on there.--Robertson-Glasgow 08:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arthur Courcy the umbrella-handle muncher???

In the article, it is written that "an Epsom stockbroker called Arthur Courcy, is said to have bitten through his brother-in-law's umbrella handle." I've read countless times about "a spectator" biting through his umbrella handle, but I have never seen him named. Is there any sort of reference to this? Cheers, Robertson-Glasgow 08:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Worry not, all; this has been resolved. Robertson-Glasgow 15:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Citations needed

I haven't flagged them in the article, but the quotations from CP Moody and Neville Cardus need to have the books that they are taken from cited. (Nice work, BTW.) JH (talk page) 20:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I shall get to it. Robertson-Glasgow 15:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)