Talk:History of Sikhism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article History of Sikhism, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
|
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
[edit] Neutrality
"Those of different faiths." is not a neutral way to refer to hindus. This whole article seems to be written from a sikh POV. Zazaban 03:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Well it wasn't just Hindus who Kabir was revered by, I can change this to Hindus, Muslims and other faiths if there is a concensus for it. You are quoting as if the word Hindu is not mentioned and "those of different faiths" is used to describe any non-Sikhs mentioned in the article, that is not the case. Jsu 11:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Well you can write as "people in general" or "commonly worshipped by people of all religions"Ajjay (talk) 15:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Well no Christians were around in medieval India so that would be false and Muslims only consider Mohammad as their final Prophet, so to be correct I used Sufis as some but NOT all Sufis recognise Kabir as a Saint.
The article is as usual pretty anti-Hindu, I will ask some senior administrator of Wikipedia to look deeper into some biased 'contributors' Thanks, D.Green —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.3.244 (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Content
This entire page needs to be revised due to the lack of Guru Ram Dass, and comments on the page which say "Where is Guru Ram Dass" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.174.131 (talk) 20:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
As well as this, there is writing which lacks any citation and is written very informally, as if from the hand of a child.
