Talk:History of Falun Gong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A FALUN GONG DISCUSSION FORUM! Please, add new messages pertaining to editing the FLG article at the bottom of this page. |
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The introduction of this article is a virtual duplicate of the intro for a few other Falun Gong articles. As such I've commented it out and placed an editors note in the article. Somebody needs to write a NPOV introduction for the History of Falun Gong. CovenantD 21:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] IED
The IED is a human rights group [1]. The reason why it is often cited is because they probably made a statement [2] at the 53rd session at the U.N. Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, regarding the self-immolation incident. Various Falun Gong articles (written in Chinese) regarded this as the UN, or the "IED Bureau under UN" investigated the incident and the results were that the incident was staged. But as the article shows, it's just that, an announcement by a Non-Government Organization. Not much authority to appeal. --Yenchin 02:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- The reason I emphasis on "probably" is because the article, although could be found on the UN website, cannot be fished out by their search engine. It isn't even listed on the 53rd session document list. An odd fact, though I have no ways to find out the reason. --Yenchin 02:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Uncited statements
Anything that has a <citation needed> tag will be removed in three days unless sources are found and included. CovenantD 16:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 1992-1994
The third paragraph is almost word for word from the biography. This needs to be summarized and reworded. As it stands now, it is a copyright violation. You have three days before I remove it. CovenantD 17:48, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
This article lacks source/citation. We need to tag it with something. --inky 11:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
The Falun Gong article is already too big, I don't think that it's a good idea to merge into it any more, this is why the separate articles where made in the first pace. I'll remove the merge tag, if you wish to put it in, please add some comment bellow. Thank You. --HappyInGeneral 09:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Reasoning for the merge is being discussed on Falun_Gong#Merge_proposal page. --HappyInGeneral 09:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
that goes nowhere. i think it is a great idea to merge.--Asdfg12345 23:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
