Talk:Hispano-Suiza HS.404

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

[edit] Merging

I am not in favour - it would produce too large an article with diverging weapon histories. Can a rationale for merging be given? Saltmarsh 07:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

I am not in favour either; the Hispano cannon was of significance in its own right, especially considering the efforts made ny the US and the UK to improve the weapon during the difficult stages of WWII, and taking into account the uses to which it was put and the number that were manufactured. RG 14 October 2006

Oppose as per above. There were significant developmental and operational differences between these weapons Emoscopes ^Talk 19:45, 14 October 2006 (UTC)