History of supernova observation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Crab Nebula is a pulsar wind nebula associated with the 1054 supernova.
The Crab Nebula is a pulsar wind nebula associated with the 1054 supernova.

The known history of supernova observation goes back to 185 CE, when supernova SN 185 appeared, the oldest appearance of a supernova recorded by humankind. Several additional supernovae within the Milky Way galaxy have been recorded since that time, with SN 1604 being the last supernova to be observed.[1]

Since the development of the telescope, the field of supernova discovery has expanded to other galaxies. These occurrences provide important information on the distances of galaxies. Successful models of supernova behavior have also been developed, and the role of supernova in the star formation process is now increasingly understood.

Contents

[edit] Early history

In 185 CE, Chinese astronomers recorded the appearance of a bright star in the sky, and observed that it took about eight months to fade from the sky. It was observed to sparkle like a star and did not move across the heavens like a comet. These observations are consistent with the appearance of a supernova, and this is believed to be the oldest recorded by humankind. SN 185 may have also possibly been recorded in Roman literature, though no records have survived.[2] The gaseous shell RCW 86 is suspected as being the remnant of this event, and recent X-ray studies show a good match for the expected age.[3]

In 393 CE, the Chinese recorded the appearance of another "guest star", SN 393, in the modern constellation of Scorpius.[4] Additional unconfirmed supernovae events may have been observed in 369 CE, 386 CE, 437 CE, 827 CE and 902 CE.[1] However these have not yet been associated with a supernova remnant, and so they remain only candidates. Over a span of about 2,000 years, Chinese astronomers recorded a total of twenty such candidate events, including later explosions noted by Islamic, European and possibly Indian and other observers.[1][5]

The supernova SN 1006 appeared in the southern constellation of Lupus during the year 1006 CE. This was the brightest recorded star ever to appear in the night sky, and its presence was noted in China, Egypt, Iraq, Italy, Japan and Switzerland. It may also have been noted in France, Syria and North America. Egyptian physician, astronomer and astrologer Ali ibn Ridwan gave the brightness of this star as one-quarter the brightness of the Moon. Modern astronomers have discovered the faint remnant of this explosion and determined that it was only 7,100 light-years from the Earth.[6]

Multiwavelength X-ray image of SN 1572 or Tycho's Nova (NASA/CXC/Rutgers/J.Warren & J.Hughes et al.)
Multiwavelength X-ray image of SN 1572 or Tycho's Nova (NASA/CXC/Rutgers/J.Warren & J.Hughes et al.)

Supernova SN 1054 was another widely-observed event, with Arab, Chinese and Japanese astronomers recording the star's appearance in 1054 CE. It may also have been recorded by the Anasazi as a petroglyph.[7] This explosion appeared in the constellation of Taurus, where it produced the Crab Nebula remnant. At its peak, the luminosity of SN 1054 may have been four times as bright as Venus, and it remained visible in daylight for 23 days and was visible in the night sky for 653 days.[8][9]

There are fewer records of supernova SN 1181, which occurred in the constellation Cassiopeia just over a century after SN 1054. It was noted by Chinese and Japanese astronomers, however. The pulsar 3C58 may be the stellar relic from this event.[10]

The Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe was noted for his careful observations of the night sky from his observatory on the island of Hven. In 1572 he noted the appearance of a new star, also in the constellation Cassiopeia. Later called SN 1572, this supernova was associated with a remnant during the 1960s.[11]

A common belief in Europe during this period was the Aristotelian idea that the world beyond the Moon and planets was immutable. So observers argued that the phenomenon was something in the Earth's atmosphere. However Tycho noted that the object remained stationary from night to night—never changing its parallax—so it must lie far away.[12][13] He published his observations in the small book De Stella Nova (Latin for "concerning the new star") in 1573. It is from the title of this book that the modern word nova for cataclysmic variable stars is derived.[14]

Multiwavelength X-ray image of the remnant of Kepler's Supernova, SN 1604. (Chandra X-ray Observatory)
Multiwavelength X-ray image of the remnant of Kepler's Supernova, SN 1604. (Chandra X-ray Observatory)

The last supernova to be seen in the Milky Way galaxy was SN 1604, which was observed October 9, 1604. Several people noted the sudden appearance of this star, but it was Johannes Kepler who became noted for his systematic study of the object. He published his observations in the work De Stella nova in pede Serpentarii.[15]

Galileo, like Tycho before him, tried in vain to measure the parallax of this new star, and then argued against the Aristotelian view of an immutable heavens.[16] The remnant of this supernova was identified in 1941 at the Mt. Wilson observatory.[17]

[edit] Telescope observation

The true nature of the supernova remained obscure for some time. Observers slowly came to recognize a class of stars that undergo long-term periodic fluctuations in luminosity. Both John Russell Hind in 1848 and Norman Pogson in 1863 had charted stars that underwent sudden changes in brightness. However these received little attention from the astronomical community. In 1866, however, William Higgins made the first spectroscopic observations of a nova, discovering lines of hydrogen in the unusual spectrum of the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis.[18] Higgins proposed a cataclysmic explosion as the underlying mechanism, and his efforts drew interest from other astronomers.[19]

In 1885, a nova-like outburst was observed in the direction of the Andromeda galaxy by Ernst Hartwig in Estonia. S Andromedae increased to 6th magnitude, outshining the entire nucleus of the galaxy, then faded in a manner much like a nova. However, in 1917, George W. Ritchey measured the distance to the Andromeda galaxy and discovered it lay much further than had previously been thought. This meant that S Andromedae, which did not just lie along the line of sight to the galaxy but had actually resided in the nucleus, released a much greater amount of energy than was typical for a nova.[20]

Early work on this new category of nova was performed during the 1930s by Walter Baade and Fritz Zwicky at Mount Wilson Observatory.[21] They identified S Andromedae, what they considered a typical supernova, as an explosive event that released radiation approximately equal to the Sun's total energy output for 107 years. They decided to call this new class of cataclysmic variables super-novae, and postulated that the energy was generated by the gravitational collapse of ordinary stars into neutron stars.[22]

Although supernova are relatively rare events, occurring on average about once a century in the Milky Way, observations of distant galaxies allowed supernovae to be discovered and examined more frequently. The first spectral classification of these distant supernova was performed by Rudolph Minkowski in 1941. He categorized them into two types, based on whether or not lines of the element hydrogen appeared in the supernova spectrum.[23] Zwicky later proposed additional types III, IV and V, although these are no longer used and now appear to be associated with single peculiar supernova types. Further sub-division of the spectra categories resulted in the modern supernova classification scheme.[24]

In the aftermath of the Second World War, Fred Hoyle worked on the problem of how the various observed elements in the universe were produced. In 1946 he proposed that a massive star could generate the necessary thermonuclear reactions, and the nuclear reactions of heavy elements were responsible for the removal of energy necessary for a gravitational collapse to occur. The collapsing star became rotationally unstable, and produced an explosive expulsion of elements that were distributed into interstellar space.[25] The concept that rapid nuclear fusion was the source of energy for a supernova explosion was developed by Hoyle and William Fowler during the 1960s.[26]

[edit] Recent results

The modern standard model for Type Ia supernovae explosions is founded on a proposal by Whelan and Iben in 1973, and is based upon a mass-transfer scenario to a degenerate companion star.[27] In particular, the light curve of SN 1972e in NGC 5253, which was observed for more than a year, was followed long enough to discover that after its broad "hump" in brightness, the supernova faded at a nearly constant rate of about 0.01 magnitudes per day. Translated to another system of units, this is nearly the same as the decay rate of cobalt-56 (56Co), whose half-life is 77 days. The degenerate explosion model predicts the production of about a solar mass of nickel-56 (56Ni) by the exploding star. The 56Ni decays with a half-life of 6.8 days to 56Co, and the decay of the nickel and cobalt provides the energy radiated away by the supernova late in its history. The agreement in both total energy production and the fade rate between the theoretical models and the observations of 1972e led to rapid acceptance of the degenerate-explosion model.[28]

Through observation of the light curves of many Type Ia supernovae, it was discovered that they appear to have a common peak luminosity.[29] By measuring the luminosity of these events, the distance to their host galaxy can be estimated with good accuracy. Thus this category of supernovae has become highly useful as a standard candle for measuring cosmic distances. In 1998, the High-Z Supernova Search and the Supernova Cosmology Project discovered that the most distant Type Ia supernovae appeared dimmer than expected. This has provided evidence that the expansion of the universe may be accelerating.[30][31]

Although no supernova has been observed in the Milky Way since 1604, it appears that a supernova exploded in the constellation Cassiopeia about 300 years ago, around the year 1667 or 1680. The remnant of this explosion, Cassiopeia A - is heavily obscured by interstellar dust, which is possibly why it did not make a notable appearance. However it can be observed in other parts of the spectrum, and it is the currently the brightest radio source beyond our solar system.[32]

Supernova 1987A remnant near the center
Supernova 1987A remnant near the center

In 1987, Supernova 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud was observed within hours of its start. The relative proximity of this supernovae has allowed detailed observation, and it provided the first opportunity for modern theories of supernova formation to be tested against observations.

The "Champagne Supernova" was discovered in a forming galaxy in 2003. The appearance of this supernova was studied in "real-time", and it has posed several major physical questions as it seems more massive than the Chandrasekhar limit would allow.[33]

First observed in September 2006, the supernova SN 2006gy, which occurred in a galaxy called NGC 1260 (240 million light-years away), is the largest and, until confirmation of luminosity of SN 2005ap in October 2007, the most luminous supernova ever observed. The explosion was at least 100 times more luminous than any previously observed supernova,[34][35] with the progenitor star being estimated 150 times more massive than our Sun.[36] Although this had some characteristics of a Type Ia supernova, Hydrogen was found in the spectrum.[37] Currently it is thought that SN 2006gy is a likely candidate for a pair-instability supernova. SN 2005ap, which was discovered by Robert Quimby who also discovered SN 2006gy, was about twice as bright as SN 2006gy and about 300 times as bright as a normal type II supernova.[38]

On May 21, 2008, astronomers announced that they had for the first time caught a supernova on camera just as it was exploding. By chance, a burst of X-rays was noticed while looking at galaxy NGC 2770, 88 million light-years from Earth, and a variety of telescopes were aimed in that direction just in time to capture what has been named SN 2008D. "This eventually confirmed that the big X-ray blast marked the birth of a supernova," said Alicia Soderberg of Princeton University.[39]

[edit] Future

The estimated rate of supernova production in a galaxy the size of the Milky Way is about one every 50 years. This is much higher than the actual observed rate, implying that a portion of these events have been obscured from the Earth by interstellar dust. However new instruments that can observe across a wide range of the spectrum, as well as the deployment of neutrino detectors, mean that the next such event will almost certainly be detected.[40]

[edit] Some historical supernovae

year (number) appeared in
(constellation)
apparent magnitude distance
(light years)
type comments
ca. 9000 BC Vela (Vel) –13?[citation needed] 815 II Vela Supernova Remnant[41]
185 Centaurus (Cen) –8 4000-10,000 I  
386 Sagittarius (Sgr) +1.5 >16,000   might have been a nova and not a supernova
393 Scorpius (Sco) –0 34,000    
SN 1006 Lupus (Lup) –7.5[42] 7200 I  
1054 Taurus (Tau) –6 6500 II remnant is the Crab Nebula with its pulsar (neutron star)
1181 Cassiopeia (Cas) 0 8500    
1572 Cassiopeia (Cas) –4.0 8000 I Tycho's Nova
1604 Ophiuchus (Oph) –3 14,000 I Kepler's Star
ca. 1680 Cassiopeia (Cas) +5 9000   has since remained inconspicuous (was too weak); remnant is Cas A, the brightest extrasolar radio source in the sky
1885A Andromeda (And) +7 2,400,000 Ipec first observation of an extragalactic supernova: in the Andromeda Nebula
1940B Coma Berenices (Com) +12.8 38,000,000 II-P extragalactic: in the galaxy NGC 4725; first observation of a Type II supernova
1983N Hydra (Hya) +11.8 15,000,000 Ib extragalactic: in the galaxy Messier 83; first observation of a Type Ib supernova
1986J Andromeda (And) +18.4 30,000,000 IIn extragalactic: in the galaxy NGC 891; bright in the radio frequency range
1987A Dorado (Dor) +2.9 160,000 IIpec in the Large Magellanic Cloud; intense radiation reached the earth on 23rd February 1987, 7:35:35 u UT. This supernova was especially interesting since the star could be found on old pictures.
1993J Ursa Major (UMa) +10.8 11,000,000 IIb extragalactic: in the galaxy M81; brightest supernova on the northern hemisphere since 1954
SN 2006gy Perseus (Per) +15 240,000,000 IIn (*) extragalactic in the galaxy NGC 1260, largest supernova so far; observed by NASA.
*with a peak over 70 days possibly a new type, caused by an extraordinarily heavy star with a mass of approximately 150 times the sun's mass

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c Clark, D. H.; Stephenson, F. R. (June 29, 1981). "The Historical Supernovae". Supernovae: A survey of current research; Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute: 355–370, Cambridge, England: Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co.. Retrieved on 2006-09-24. 
  2. ^ Stothers, Richard (1977). "Is the Supernova of CE 185 Recorded in Ancient Roman Literature". Isis 68 (3): 443447. doi:10.1086/351822. 
  3. ^ "New evidence links stellar remains to oldest recorded supernova", ESA News, September 18, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-05-24. 
  4. ^ Wang, Z.-R.; Qu, Q. Y.; Chen, Y. (1998). "The AD 393 Guest Star; the SNR RX 51713.7-3946". Proceedings of IAU Symposium #188: 262, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. Retrieved on 2006-09-24. 
  5. ^ Hartmut Frommert, Christine Kronberg. Supernovae observed in the Milky Way: Historical Supernovae. SEDS. Retrieved on 2007-01-03.
  6. ^ Astronomers Peg Brightness of History’s Brightest Star. NAOA News (March 5, 2003). Retrieved on 2006-06-08.
  7. ^ Greening, Dan (1995). 1054 Supernova Petrograph. Pomona College Astronomy Program. Retrieved on 2006-09-25.
  8. ^ Collins II, G. W.; Claspy, W. P.; Martin, J. C. (1999). "A Reinterpretation of Historical References to the Supernova of A.D. 1054". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 111 (761): 871–880. doi:10.1086/316401. 
  9. ^ Brecher, K.; et al. (1983). "Ancient records and the Crab Nebula supernova". The Observatory 103: 106–113. 
  10. ^ 3C58: Pulsar Gives Insight on Ultra Dense Matter and Magnetic Fields. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (December 14, 2004). Retrieved on 2006-09-26.
  11. ^ Villard, R.; Sanders, R.. "Stellar survivor from 1572 CE explosion supports supernova theory", UCBerkeley News, July 24, 1991. Retrieved on 2006-09-25. 
  12. ^ Cowen, R. (1999). "Danish astronomer argues for a changing cosmos". Science News 156 (25 & 26). 
  13. ^ Nardo, Don (2007). Tycho Brahe: Pioneer of Astronomy. Compass Point Books. ISBN 0756533090. 
  14. ^ Stacey, Blake. Supernovas: Making Astronomical History. SNEWS: Supernova Early Warning System. Retrieved on 2006-09-25.
  15. ^ Johannes Kepler: De Stella Nova. New York Society Library. Retrieved on 2007-01-03.
  16. ^ Wilson, Fred L. (July 7, 1996). History of Science: Galileo and the Rise of Mechanism. Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved on 2006-09-25.
  17. ^ Blair, Bill. Bill Blair's Kepler's Supernova Remnant Page. NASA and Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved on 2006-09-20.
  18. ^ Higgins, William (1866). "On a New Star". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 26: 275. 
  19. ^ Becker, Barbara J. (1993). Eclecticism, Opportunism, and the Evolution of a New Research Agenda: William and Margaret Huggins and the Origins of Astrophysics. University of California—Irvine. Retrieved on 2006-09-27.
  20. ^ van Zyl, Jan Eben (2003). VARIABLE STARS VI. Astronomical Society of Southern Africa. Retrieved on 2006-09-27.
  21. ^ Baade, W.; Zwicky, F. (1934). "On Super-Novae". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20: 254–259. Retrieved on 2008-06-04. 
  22. ^ Osterbrock, D. E. (1999). "Who Really Coined the Word Supernova? Who First Predicted Neutron Stars?". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 33: 1330. 
  23. ^ Rudolph, Minkowski (1941). "Spectra of Supernovae". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 53 (314): 224. doi:10.1086/125315. 
  24. ^ da Silva, L. A. L. (1993). "The Classification of Supernovae". Astrophysics and Space Science 202 (2): 215–236. doi:10.1007/BF00626878. 
  25. ^ Hoyle, Fred (1946). "The Synthesis of the Elements from Hydrogen". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 106: 343–383. 
  26. ^ Woosley, S. E. (1999). "Hoyle & Fowler's Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae". Astrophysical Journal 525C: 924. 
  27. ^ Whelan, J.; Iben Jr., I. (1973). "Binaries and Supernovae of Type I". Astrophysical Journal 186: 1007–1014. doi:10.1086/152565. 
  28. ^ Trimble, V. (1982). "Supernovae. Part I: the events". Reviews of Modern Physics 54: 1183–1224. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.54.1183. 
  29. ^ Kowal, C. T. (1968). "Absolute magnitudes of supernovae". Astronomical Journal 73: 1021–1024. doi:10.1086/110763. 
  30. ^ Leibundgut, B.; Sollerman, J. (2001). "A cosmological surprise: the universe accelerates". Europhysics News 32 (4). 
  31. ^ "Confirmation of the accelerated expansion of the Universe", Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, September 19, 2003. Retrieved on 2006-11-03. 
  32. ^ Cassiopeia A - SNR. CalTech/NASA Infrared Processing and Analysis Center. Retrieved on 2006-10-02.
  33. ^ Howell, D. A.; et al (2006). "Snls-03d3bb: An Overluminous, Low Velocity Type Ia Supernova Discovered At Z=0.244". American Astronomical Society Meeting 208. Retrieved on 2008-06-04. 
  34. ^ Berardelli, Phil. "Star Goes Out Big Time", Science Magazine ScienceNOW Daily News, May 7, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-06-04. 
  35. ^ Grey Hautaluoma, Grey Hautaluoma and Megan Watzke. "NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever", NASA, May 7, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-06-04. 
  36. ^ Dunham, Will. "Brightest supernova ever seen", News in Science, Space and Astronomy, May 8, 2007. 
  37. ^ Shiga, David. "Brightest supernova discovery hints at stellar collision", New Scientist, January 3, 2007. Retrieved on 2006-05-24. 
  38. ^ Than, Ker (October 11, 2007). Supernova blazed like 100 billion suns. MSNBC. Retrieved on 2007-10-17.
  39. ^ Anonymous. "Supernova caught exploding on camera", Yahoo! news, May 21, 2008. Retrieved on 2008-05-22. 
  40. ^ Türler, Marc (2006). "INTEGRAL reveals Milky Ways' supernova rate". CERN Courier 46 (1). 
  41. ^ Blair, William P. (June 4, 2003). Bill Blair's Vela Supernova Remnant File. NASA/FUSE. Retrieved on 2008-03-18.
  42. ^ Winkler, P. Frank (2003). "The SN 1006 Remnant: Optical Proper Motions, Deep Imaging, Distance, and Brightness at Maximum". The Astrophysical Journal 585: 324–335. doi:10.1086/345985. 

[edit] External links