History of Latin America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latin America refers to countries in the Americas where Latin-derived (Romance) languages are spoken; these countries generally lie south of the United States. By extension, some, particularly in the United States, incorrectly apply the term to the whole region south of the United States — including non-Romance-speaking countries such as Suriname, Jamaica, and Guyana.
This region was home to many indigenous peoples and advanced civilizations, including the notable Aztecs, Inca and Maya, before the arrival of Europeans in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. Most of Latin America was colonized by European emigrants, primarily by the Spanish and the Portuguese, and, to a lesser extent, by the French. In the early 19th century most of the countries in the region attained their independence, although a few small colonies remain.
Contents |
[edit] Pre-Columbian
Latin American history extends back many centuries, possibly as long as 30,000 years. Precise dating is difficult because there are few text sources. However, highly-developed civilizations flourished at various times and places, such as the Andean Inca and Central American Maya and the Aztecs.
[edit] Colonialism
Christopher Columbus "discovered" the Americas in 1492. Subsequently, the major sea powers in Europe sent expeditions to the New World to build market lines and colonies. First, concentrating on the central and southern parts of the Americas, the Spanish and Portuguese built large colonial empires in California, Mexico, and Brazil.
[edit] 19th century : Post-colonial era
Following the model of the U.S. and French revolutions, most of Latin America achieved its independence by 1825. However, Europe and the United States continued to play major roles.
The independence of Latin American countries finally allowed the dislocation of the structures and old balances, justice and power are monopolized by new "owners" and a new law supporting the property.
Ejidos were put on sale, those who had land became owners by purchasing them. Poor people became submitted to the economy instead of landlords, without confucian principle of mutual respect between superior and vassal. Profitability attracted many to buy/exploit the lands: the poor do not have any more land of reserve.
In Brazil, in 1910, 85% of lands belonged to 1% of the population.
Thus, gold (in the post-independence societies of Latin America) and fruit (two-thirds of the raw materials produced by the exploitation of the farmers and their plantations) were monopolised by the owners of the land.
These 'Great Owners' totally controlled the local activity and furthermore were the principal employers and the main source of revenue. This led to a society of workers, little politicised and poor who thought these local 'lords' were lawful.
This ecomomy of large estates was adapted to the international market economy, from which it drew its capital, but underwent fluctuations of price. The inequality of the condition of their workers encouraged free competition with the more equalatarian states.
Mongrel reality was completely denied on the level of powerful, except in Mexico. The official culture was exclusively European, catholic, positivist, except in Mexico.
In spite of the proclamation of constitutions inspired by the constitutions of America and France, the lack of involvement of the population dissallowed their implementation to the middle-class who weren't really interested.
After the efforts of Gran Colombia, the Central-American Republic and of the United States of South America the confusing nature of the borders provoked a number of interstate conflicts, whereas the interior of the countries was often plagued by the fights between federalists and centralists who finally asserted themselves only by action and military repression of the opponents. There remained a difficult to define national space, a nation resembling a state, since these states even were identified only by their European (Spanish or Portuguese) roots and their official population sharing the same language and origins.
The modernization of the networks was mainly justified by the need for control over the whole of its territory, and the capacity to quickly take action at its borders.
This militarisation of the Latin American company caused the recurring emergence of Caudillos, military chiefs whose hold on power depended on his abilities in battle, as a man of action. They entrusted the local authority to these Corronel writes of the local chiefs, 'holding their power of their personal richness and their political fidelity with the chief'
The regimes were either presidential, a little liberal and rather democratic; or Parliamentary that is to say more liberal, less democratic and more oligarchic. In both cases, the opinion of the average-man was devalued. The vote in any event often conditional, favourining a political life is limited to an oligarchy.
The political life, except with the Caudillos, was occupied by the conservatives and the liberals, who in both cases did not have a social policy. And the popular insurrections, when they were expressed, were often influential and repressed: 100,000 died simultaneously during a Colombian revolt around 1890.
Only some States manage to have some semblance of democracy: Uruguay, and partially Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Colombia. The others were clearly oligarchist, sometimes with a major support.
Economically, the Latin America was certainly dependent on Europe (mainly England) and the United States; independence left a place for an increased dependence especially in the ninteenth century which saw an increase in the dependence on the investment provided.
Specialist vocabulary:
Estancias and Haciendas:large-scale farms in which exploitation was rampant.
Fazendas: breeding plantations of coffee/sugar
Ejido: collective ownership, guaranteeing certain rights to each one of the members of the community.
Propriety: the good of only one person.
[edit] 20th century under USA leadership
- See discussion page for how you can help translate this article or section.
- See also: Mexican Revolution, 1973 Chilean coup d'état, Just Cause operation, and João_Goulart#The military overthrow of Goulart
[edit] 1900-1920
A few agreements were signed with the American intervention in Cuba in 1898 and Platt Amendment in 1902, which authorized the U.S. to intervene in Cuba if necessary. The old Monroe Doctrine, which impeded European interventions, was therefore replaced by the Big Stick Doctrine, a more interventionist doctrine aimed to defend U.S. interests.
In Colombia, the concession of the Panama Canal was repurchased in 1903, but the Colombian elites opposed this American seizure. A Panamanian insurrection then occurred, armed with military material marked with the "U.S." sign, independence was imposed, and Panama became an ally of the United States.
In Mexico, Porfirio Díaz promised that he would withdraw from power in 1908. Francisco Madero, a moderate liberal whose aim was to modernize the country calmly in order to avoid a socialist revolution, launches an election campaign to defend the liberal ideas in 1910. But Díaz organizes a seventh faked election, which prompted the Mexican Revolution. Riots are organized and some key leaders appear: Pancho Villa in the north, Emiliano Zapata in the west, and a more moderate Francisco I. Madero in Mexico City. The United States finally releases Porfirio Díaz in 1911, who will resign on May 27, and flee, leaving the scene to Madero who will become President on November 6, 1911. Madero undertakes a democratization process, but little is made in relation of the agrarian claims while Zapata continues the revolution. In February 18, 1913 Adolfo de la Huerta, a conservative general organizes a coup d'état with the support of the United States: Madero is killed on the 22th. Other revolutionary chiefs: Pancho Villa, Zapata, and Venustiano Carranza reject this "usurper" who is soon released by the United States, dissatisfied with his dictatorial behavior. Allies Zapata and Villa take Mexico City in March 1914, but in this working city they are not on their ground and withdraw to their respective bastions. This allows Carranza, after the escape of Huerta in July 1914, to carry out a battle for victory. He then organizes the repression of the rebel armies of Villa and Zapata, in particular by general Álvaro Obregón who gains decisive victories in 1915, takes Mexico City and becomes a de facto president in October 1915. The Mexican constitution of 1917 is proclaimed, but little enforced.
Under the orders of Carranza and with the American military support, Obregón continues his military pressure on the rebels. Zapata is finally assassinated in April 10, 1919. Carranza, the president, is assassinated in May 15, 1920, leaving the place to Obregón, who becomes an elected president. Finally in 1923, it is Pancho Villa who is assassinated.
Mexico finally becomes pacified by the accession of that liberal president, but agrarian aspirations of the work force remain unsatisfied.
- See also: Mexican Revolution
- See also: Agrarian land reform in Mexico
[edit] Years 1930-1960
The arrival of Franklin Roosevelt in 1933 gives way to his Good Neighbor Policy and allows certain nationalizations and attainments of American interests. The Platt Amendment is repealed, liberating Cuba. Mexican President Lazaro Cardenas nationalizes certain large American companies, creates Pemex, and redistributes a quantity of land.
Since 1860, Cuba had focused on the cultivation of sugar, of which 82% was now feeding into the American market. Cuba was described however as being the brothel of the U.S., where one finds all sorts of pleasures provided he is rich. The U.S. intervened many times to suppress popular uprisings, and to maintain Cuban governments favorable to its own interests. The latter country had a socially advanced constitution whose execution was, however, deeply corrupt, and a large part of the goods and exploits of sugar were at the hands of American companies. Since 1933, Fulgencio Batista was the key autocrat of Cuba. His authoritarian coup in 1952 did not end with an ignoble dictatorship, but it did not change much; corruption endured, and the American presence grew. Certain revolutionaries, such as Fidel Castro, organized a revolution to reestablish a democratic state and free itself from the American influence.
Having left Mexico on a yacht christened Granma December 2, 1956, the 82 sailors are finally reduced to 13, and lead a guerilla coup of the mountain, of which the principal conflict was a work of propaganda, for example via Radio Rebelde. More and more powerful against an unmotivated Cuban army, the guerillas conquered Cuba between October 1958 and January 1, 1959.
But Castro, who first states his position as a non-socialist, finally engages his country in agrarian reforms and nationalizations in May 1959 and especially December 1960 which push John Kennedy to intervene, an event better known as the Bay of Pigs Invasion, April 16, 1961. But instead of taking Cuba back to the American modus operandi, this radicalizes its position, and Cuba proclaims its character definitively socialist, makes friends with the USSR, and arms itself, leading to the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962.
[edit] American policies and doctrines imposed on Latin America
- See discussion page for how you can help translate this article or section.
- Monroe Doctrine (1823): James Monroe proclaimed Europe was to stay out of the independent American nations; this excluded European colonies.
- Big Stick Policy (1890-1920): The USA took the role of 'police officer' for other American countries, usually to protect its own interests.
- Drago Convention (1902):
- Tobar Policy (1907): Military coups and revolutionary governments were officially unrecognized by the USA.
- Wilson Doctrine: Crusade for democracy.
- Good Neighbor Policy (from Hoover to Roosevelt): equal-to-equal diplomacy.
- Kennedy Doctrine: offensive policy against Cuba (Bay of Pigs invasion); containment policy against alleged communist movements, through national security doctrine (counter-insurgency training in the School of the Americas) and the Alliance for Progress
- Lyndon B. Johnson: support to the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état
- Richard Nixon: United States intervention in Chile
- Reagan Doctrine (1980s): The USA would fight against communism and socialism, even backing military coup d'états.
- Current relations: Keep good relations with Latin American countries because of their deposits of oil and keep a neutral position regarding anti-integrist wars.
[edit] See also
[edit] Pre-Columbian
Mesoamerica : Aztec, Huastec, Mixtec, Maya, Olmec, Pipil, Tarascan, Teotihuacán, Toltec, Totonac, Zapotec
South America : Chavin, Chibcha, Chimor, Chachapoya, Huari, Inca, Moche, Nazca, Tiwanaku
[edit] Colonization
British, danish, Dutch and New Netherland, French and New France, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, New Spain, Conquistador, Spanish conquest of Yucatan, Spanish conquest of Mexico, Spanish missions in California, Swedish
[edit] History by Region
|
[edit] History by Country
|
- Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico
Other topics : Relations with the USA, Relations with Europe, Relations with the PRC, Feminist history in Latin America, History of the Jews in Latin America, Landless Workers' Movement
[edit] Notes
This article does not cite any references or sources. (April 2008) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
[edit] Bibliography
Introductions
- Bakewell, Peter, A History of Latin America (Blackwell History of the World (Paperback)), Blackwell Publishers 1997
- Brown, Jonathan C. Latin America: A Social History of the Colonial Period, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2nd edition 2004
- Burns, Bradford, Latin America: A Concise Interpretive History, paperback, PrenticeHall 2001, 7th edition
- Green, Duncan, Silent Revolution: The Rise and Crisis of Market Economics in Latin America, New York University Press 2003
- Herring, Hubert, A History of Latin America: from the Beginnings to the Present, 1955. ISBN 0-07-553562-9
- Schoultz, Lars, Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy Toward Latin America, Harvard University Press 1998,
- Skidmore, Thomas E. and Smith, Peter H., Modern Latin America, Oxford University Press 2005
Handbooks
- The Cambridge history of Latin America (11 vls)
- The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas (3vls)
Papers
- Valenzuela, Arturo. "Latin American Presidencies Interrupted" in Journal of Democracy Volume 15, Number 4 October 2004