Hispanophobia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hispanophobia (from Latin Hispanicus, "Spanish" + Greek + φοβία (phobia), "fear") is extreme or irrational fear, aversion, or discrimination regarding Hispanic persons. As a historical phenomenon it is considered to have had three main stages, originating in 16th century Europe, reawakening during 19th century disputes over Spanish and Mexican territory such as the Spanish-American and Mexican-American Wars, and lastly increasing in tandem with politically charged controversies such as bilingual education and illegal immigration to the United States.

Contents 1 History 1.1 The "Black Legend" 1.2 Hispanophobia in the United States 2 Contemporary forms of hispanophobia 2.1 "Official English" and mock Spanish 2.2 U.S. immigration controversy 2.3 Scientific racism 3 See also 4 External links 5 References

[edit] History

[edit] The "Black Legend"

Early instances of hispanophobia arose as the influence of the Spanish Empire and Inquisition spread through late-medieval Europe. During this period hispanophobia materialized in folklore sometimes referred to as "the Black Legend":

"The legend first arose amid the religious strife and imperial rivalries of 16th-century Europe. Northern Europeans, who loathed Catholic Spain and envied its American empire, published books and gory engravings that depicted Spanish colonization as uniquely barbarous: an orgy of greed, slaughter and papist depravity, the Inquisition writ large."^[1]

La leyenda negra, as Spanish historians first named it, entailed a view of Spaniards as "unusually cruel, avaricious, treacherous, fanatical, superstitious, cowardly, corrupt, decadent, indolent, and authoritarian." As Spain and England colonized the Americas, "[t]he Black Legend informed Anglo Americans' judgments about the political, economic, religious, and social forces that had shaped the Spanish provinces from Florid to California, as well as throughout the hemisphere."^[2]

Thus in North America, hispanophobia preceded the United States' Declaration of Independence by almost two hundred years. Historians theorize that the English and the Dutch employed and encouraged it as part of their efforts to undermine the Spanish Empire; early New Englanders engaged in hispanophobic efforts to assimilate Spanish colonies:

"[I]n North America a deep current of Hispanophobia pervades Anglo-Saxon culture. ... As early as the late seventeenth century, we find Puritan divines like Cotton Mather and Samuel Sewell studying Spanish--with a view to winning converts to their version of Protestantism. Sewell spoke of "bombing [sic] Santo Domingo, Havana, Puerto Rico, and Mexico itself" with the Spanish Bible, and Cotton Mather even wrote a book on Protestant doctrine in Spanish, published in Boston in 1699, intended for--as he might say--the darker regions of Spanish America."^[3]

[edit] Hispanophobia in the United States

As the United States' foreign policy began to develop expansionist tendencies, citizens adapted the "Black Legend" in order to exploit it for political purposes. In so doing, they imparted elements of racism to hispanophobia. In the account given by Tony Horwitz, "[w]hen 19th-century jingoists revived this caricature to justify invading Spanish (and later, Mexican) territory, they added a new slur: the mixing of Spanish, African and Indian blood had created a degenerate race."^[4]

"Another circumstance," according to historian David J. Weber, "that shaped the depth of Anglo Americans' Hispanophobia was the degree to which they saw Hispanics as an obstacle to their ambitions."^[5] As the U.S. grew into a republic, anti-Spanish sentiment exhibited a recrudescence. Spain was perceived as the antithesis of Separation of church and state and as a paragon of monarchy and colonialism; this apparently fundamental opposition to the United States' founding principles fueled hostility that would eventually culminate in the Spanish-American War of 1898.^[6] Hispanophobia is particularly evident in the historiography of the Texas Revolution:

"In essence, the Texas rebellion had been little more than a struggle for political and economic power, but early Texas historians elevated the revolt against Mexico to a sublime collision of moral influences,' 'a moral struggle,' and a war for principles.'... Hispanophobia, with its particularly vitriolic anti-Mexican variant, also served as a convenient rationale to keep Mexicans 'in their place.'"^[7]

Throughout the 20th century, an array of mostly political and economic forces have driven immigration from a multitude of Spanish-speaking countries--such as Cuba, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, and Mexico--to the relatively strong economy and stable political environment of the United States. As a result, according to some historians, Americans "now have something called a 'Hispanic,' which describes not someone born in a Spanish-speaking country, nor someone who speaks Spanish well or badly, nor even someone with a Hispanic surname, but someone who identifies himself as such."^[8] As key corollary to this development, it is toward this group, which is not precisely or rigorously defined, that U.S. hispanophobia is now predominantly oriented. Many forms of hispanophobia endemic to the Texas Revolution still flourish in the United States today.^[9]

[edit] Contemporary forms of hispanophobia

[edit] "Official English" and mock Spanish

Sociologists cite the "Official English" or English-only movement, together with hispanophobic jokes and discourse, as a prominent example of modern-day hispanophobia.^[10] The "Official English movement" has been criticized because its mass appeal is perceived not as relating to any measurable benefit that would result from the eradication of bilingual education and other bilingual services, but from the idea that "challenges to the status of one's language typically engage deep-seated feelings about national identity and group worth."^[11] Proponents of this view claim that the English-only movement attracts public support primarily by functioning as a hispanophobic form of intimidation.

"Mock Spanish" is also a particular point of controversy:

• "'Mock Spanish' indirectly indexes one dimension of “White Public Space”: the right of people racialized as “White” to use a language associated with “Color” without any attention to norms of correctness of grammar, orthography, or pronunciation – in sharp contrast to the linguistic terrorism directed against persons in the United States who speak foreign languages or who speak “non-standard” forms of English.... Finally, Mock Spanish exploits and continually reproduces negative stereotypes of Spanish speakers."^[12]

• "Jokes...along with exaggerated imitations of a Spanish accent, as in, “Es no my yob,” and “My ney José Jiménez”; racist labels such as spic, wetback, greaser, beaner; and public insults like J. Edgar Hoover’s admonition that one need not worry if Mexicans or Puerto Ricans came at you with a gun because they couldn’t shoot straight, but if they had a knife, watch out—are examples of the blatantly racist discourses that construct Latinos in the United States as stupid, dirty, lazy, sexually loose, amoral, and violent."^[13]

[edit] U.S. immigration controversy

Citing groups such as the Minuteman Project, sociologists have concluded that some anti-illegal-immigration arguments in the United States have been tainted with xenophobia and hispanophobia, many of them drawing on concepts of racial purity and eugenics. These groups' concern with illegal immigration, they assert, "lies not in immigration per se., which has declined in the last decade, but in the changing national origin of new immigrants, that is immigrants are now mainly Latin American or Asian, which is seen as a threat to Anglo-Saxon hegemony."^[14]

In 2006, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard and U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton sent a letter of complaint to Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin, in response to the following comments made by radio host Brian James:

"What we'll do is randomly pick one night every week where we will kill whoever crosses the border. Step over there and you die. You get to decide whether it's your lucky night or not. I think that would be more fun."^[15]

Calling the speech "dangerous and totally irresponsible for anyone, particularly a licensed body using public airways," Goddard and Charlton expressed concern that it would lead to violence in the state, where conflict over illegal immigration was growing increasingly heated.^[16]

New Jersey internet radio host Hal Turner made similar remarks, a number of which the Anti-Defamation League has posted under the category of extremism. On April 1, 2006, Turner said:

"These filthy, disease ridden, two-legged bags of human debris are too stupid to believe....Just think, America, if we bring enough of them here, they can do for America exactly what they did for Mexico! Turn our whole country into a crime-ridden, drug infested slum....These people are sub-human. I would love it if folks who do have such weapons, used them on the crowds on April 10 [at immigration rallies]. I advocate machine gunning these invaders to death at their rallies!"^[17]

[edit] Scientific racism

This article or section is missing citations or needs footnotes. Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (May 2008)

Alike African Americans, Asian Americans, Jews in Europe and homosexuals, pseudoscientists with racist and bigoted agendas for much of the 20th century examined and created theories to explain why "Hispanics" and "Latinos" display cultural stereotypes to produce discrimination and defamation (group libel) or why they are dispised so much in Anglo American society to further fuel a fear of Hispanic-Latino populations are:

1. Racially distinct or a byproduct of miscegenation of white (Spanish) men with American Indian and African slave women, thus their descendants will have darker features or difficulties to blend in a mostly white (esp. Anglo-saxon/European/Caucasian) majority. Some false racial "scientific" studies in the early 20th century used Mexican-Americans as poor examples of "racial inferiority" due to their mestizo and some mulatto origins. Mexican society in Mexico has a stronger Amerindian foundation (indigenismo) and how much oppression the native peoples of Mexico and Central America suffered under Spanish colonial rule for three centuries (1521-1821) made them "anti-white/European".

2. Stereotyped "Hispanic" behavioral traits: Machismo or male aggressiveness, loudness or passive speech patterns, formation of youth gangs in barrios across the country, tendency to have large families due to observant practices of Roman Catholicism and AmerIndian traditions for high progeny "clans", alleged "laziness" as well Hispanics more likely in manual jobs require more time at work for less pay, inabilities to adapt the English language while they vigourously preserved Spanish as the sole language of the Hispanic/Latino community, and their continuous ethnic-national identity or loyality to their homeland instead of being "Americans" first, but as "Mexicans", "Chicanos", "Puerto Ricans", "Cubans" and other Latin American nationalities, all are exaggerated traits. Mexicans are viewed as a deep-rooted separate nationality at the first place (Mexico) thus slower acculturate in American society.

And 3. A need to "take over" or "reclaim" the United States of America as a conspiratoral plot to populate, resettle and rule over the world's most strongest country, also these poorer countries are in proximity to a developed world country further expands the fear of Hispanic/Latino peoples "knew" they want to live in the US. Also the popular notion of Mexican-Americans (Chicano, Hispano, Tejano and Californio) want to "take back" the American Southwest, while they "took down" the US-Mexican border to further allow immigrants to enter the country both legally and more often, illegally, and fought for civil rights, but to "take power away" from White Anglos in the region they assumed are "conquerors" of a former Spanish-speaking or Mexican country. Including is the Aztlan, La Raza and Mexica Movement causes that want separation, reunification and "restoration" of a predominantly Hispanic/Amerindian country (the mythical land of the Aztecs and Mexican Indians was in the Southwestern US) produces a very negative image of Mexicans and other Hispanics are "disloyal", "parasitic" and "seditious".

Also many white-Anglo racists throughout the Western US assumed Mexicans are biogenetically "inferior" or too racially different from Caucasians or aren't willing to "Americanize" but want to live in America because Mexico is a "bad country" for them, and Hispanics are playing the "race card" as a people of color want preferential treatment as an ethnic minority group to get jobs, education or public services a lot faster than white Anglos.

[edit] See also

• Illegal immigration to the United States
• Xenophobia

[edit] External links

• "Immigration — and the Curse of the Black Legend." Tony Horwitz. New York Times 9 July 2006

[edit] References