Hilary and Jackie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hilary and Jackie

US poster for the film
Directed by Anand Tucker
Produced by Nicolas Kent
Andy Paterson
Written by Frank Cottrell Boyce (screenplay)
based on A Genius in the Family by Hilary and Piers du Pré
Starring Emily Watson
Rachel Griffiths
James Frain
David Morrissey
Music by Barrington Pheloung
Cinematography David Johnson
Editing by Martin Walsh
Distributed by Channel 4 Films (UK)
October Films (US)
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Budget US$7,000,000
IMDb profile

Hilary and Jackie is a 1998 British biographical film directed by Anand Tucker. The screenplay by Frank Cottrell Boyce is based on the memoir A Genius in the Family by Piers and Hilary du Pré, which chronicles the life and career of their sister, cellist Jacqueline du Pré. The film attracted controversy and criticism for allegedly distorting details in the musician's life, and Hilary du Pré publicly defended her version of the story [1][2].

Contents

[edit] Plot

The film is divided into two sections, the first telling events from Hilary's point of view and the second from Jackie's. It opens with Hilary and Jackie as children being taught by their mother to dance and play musical instruments, the cello for Jackie and the flute for Hilary. Jackie does not take practicing seriously at first, but when she does, she becomes a virtuoso, quickly rising to international prominence. Marriage to pianist and conductor Daniel Barenboim follows. Hilary, on the other hand, plays in a community orchestra and marries Christopher Finzi, the son of composer Gerald Finzi. The film, though focused primarily on Jacqueline, is ultimately about the relationship between the two sisters and their dedication to one another; to help Jacqueline through a nervous-breakdown, Hilary consents to Jacqueline having an affair with her husband.

The last quarter of the movie chronicles in detail the last fifteen years of Jacqueline's life, during which she is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and loses control of her nervous system, becomes paralyzed, goes deaf and mute, and finally dies. The film ends with Jacqueline's ghost standing on the beach where she used to play as a child, watching herself and her sister frolicking in the sand as little girls.

[edit] Production notes

Scenes were filmed in the Blue Coat School, the County Sessions House, George's Dock, St. George's Hall, and the Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool. Additional scenes were filmed at the Royal Academy of Music and Wigmore Hall in London, and most interiors were shot at the Shepperton Studios in Surrey.

Classical pieces performed in the film include compositions by Edward Elgar, Joseph Haydn, Johann Sebastian Bach, Johannes Brahms, César Franck, Matthias Georg Monn, Georg Friedrich Händel, Robert Schumann, Ludwig van Beethoven, and Antonín Dvořák.

The film was budgeted at an estimated US$7,000,000. It grossed $4,874,838 in the US and £666,874 in the UK.

The film was rated R for language and sexuality, requiring those under age 17 to be accompanied by an adult, by the MPAA in the US, and given a 15 certificate, restricting anyone under age 15 from seeing the film in a cinema, by the British Board of Film Classification.

To avoid litigation from Daniel Barenboim, the film never has been released in France.

[edit] Principal cast

[edit] Critical reception

In his review in the New York Times, Stephen Holden called the film "one of the most insightful and wrenching portraits of the joys and tribulations of being a classical musician ever filmed" and "an astoundingly rich and subtle exploration of sibling rivalry and the volcanic collisions of love and resentment, competitiveness and mutual dependence that determine their lives," and added, "Hilary and Jackie is as beautifully acted as it is directed, edited and written." [3]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times described it as "an extraordinary film [that] makes no attempt to soften the material or make it comforting through the cliches of melodrama." [4]

In the San Francisco Chronicle, Edward Guthmann stated, "Watson is riveting and heartbreaking. Assisted by Tucker's elegant direction and Boyce's thoughtful, scrupulous writing, she gives a knockout performance." [5]

Anthony Lane of The New Yorker said, "The sense of period, of ungainly English pride, is funny and acute, but the movie mislays its sense of wit as the girls grow up. The nub of the tale . . . feels both overblown and oddly beside the point; it certainly means that Tucker takes his eye, or his ear, off the music. The whole picture, indeed, is more likely to gratify the emotionally prurient than to appease lovers of Beethoven and Elgar." [6]

Entertainment Weekly rated the film A- and added, "This unusual, unabashedly voluptuous biographical drama, a bravura feature debut for British TV director Anand Tucker, soars on two virtuoso performances: by the rightfully celebrated Emily Watson . . . and by the undercelebrated Rachel Griffiths." [7]

[edit] Controversy and protests

Although the film was a critical and box-office success, and received several Academy Award nominations, it ignited a furor, especially in London, center of du Pre's activities. A group of her closest colleagues (including fellow cellists Rostropovich and Julian Lloyd Webber) sent a bristling letter to The Times.

Clare Finzi, Hilary's daughter, charged that the film was a "gross misinterpretation, which I cannot let go unchallenged." Students from the Royal College of Music picketed the premiere, although this was later revealed by the London Evening Standard to have been a publicity stunt set up by the film's publicity company. Barenboim -- who has always teetered on the edge of villainy in du Pre-revering quarters -- said, "Couldn't they have waited until I was dead?" [1].

Hilary, Jacqui's sister, and co-author of the book strongly defends both the book and the film, writing, in The Guardian; "At first I could not understand why people didn't believe my story because I had set out to tell the whole truth. When you tell someone the truth about your family, you don't expect them to turn around and say that it's bunkum. But I knew that Jackie would have respected what I had done. If I had gone for half-measures, she would have torn it up. She would have wanted the complete story to be told."[2]. The New Yorker reports her as saying, “When you love someone, you love the whole of them. Those who are against the film want to look only at the pieces of Jackie’s life that they accept. I don’t think the film has taken any liberties at all. Jackie would have absolutely loved it.”[3]

[edit] Awards and nominations

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ "The truth about our wonderful sister Jackie," The Guardian, January 21, 1999
  2. ^ "Du Pré sister defends film," The Guardian, January 21, 1999
  3. ^ New York Times review
  4. ^ Chicago Sun-Times review
  5. ^ San Francisco Chronicle review
  6. ^ The New Yorker review
  7. ^ Entertainment Weekly review

[edit] External links

v • d • e
Cinema of the United Kingdom
Films A–Z · Actors · Directors · Cinematographers · Production designers · Editors · Producers · Score composers · Screenwriters
Films by year
Pre 1920 · 1920s · 1930s · 1940 · 1941 · 1942 · 1943 · 1944 · 1945 · 1946 · 1947 · 1948 · 1949 · 1950 · 1951 · 1952 · 1953 · 1954 · 1955 · 1956 · 1957 · 1958 · 1959 · 1960 · 1961 · 1962 · 1963 · 1964 · 1965 · 1966 · 1967 · 1968 · 1969 · 1970 · 1971 · 1972 · 1973 · 1974 · 1975 · 1976 · 1977 · 1978 · 1979 · 1980 · 1981 · 1982 · 1983 · 1984 · 1985 · 1986 · 1987 · 1988 · 1989 · 1990 · 1991 · 1992 · 1993 · 1994 · 1995 · 1996 · 1997 · 1998 · 1999 · 2000 · 2001 · 2002 · 2003 · 2004 · 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008