Talk:High Speed Civil Transport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article may need an appropriate infobox template. Aircraft WikiProject

[edit] Current Project?

I'm sort of concerned that there's no cited evidence for this being a current project, but the article is written in the present tense.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 03:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Others have expressed the same concerns on WT:AIR. You're welcome to clean it up if you get to it first. You may have a better idea of where to go with the page too, given your contributions to Concorde (Look, Ma, no "the"!) and other high-speed propulsion-related articles. - BillCJ (talk) 04:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] concorde nomenclature

FWIW I have not got the slightest intention of enforcing it either way in anything other than UK articles, but I note that there is precedent for referring to (a/the) Concorde with the British convention as simply 'Concorde'.[1] :-)- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 11:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)