Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin is the larger of two factions of Afghanistan's Hezbi Islami Party, the other being headed by Mulavi Younas Khalis who split with Hekmatyar and established his own Hezbi Islami in 1979. It is known as the Khalis faction, and its powerbase is in Nangarhar.
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar is head of Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin, or HIG, which is considered a terrorist organization by Coalition Forces in Afghanistan.
The original Hezb-e-Islami was founded in 1977 by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.
Contents |
[edit] History
During the Soviet War in Afghanistan, Hekmatyar and his party operated near the Pakistani border against Soviet Communists. Areas such as Kunar, Laghman, Jalalabad, and Paktia were Hezb-e Islami's strongholds. The party is highly centralized under Hekmatyar's command and until 1994 had close relations with Pakistan, from which it received as much $600 million in U.S. aid money to fight the war with the Soviets. Despite its ample funding, it has been described as having
the dubious distinction of never winning a significant battle during the war, training a variety of militant Islamists from around the world, killing significant numbers of mujahideen from other parties, and taking a virulently anti-Western line. In addition to hundreds of millions of dollars of American aid, Hekmatyar also received the lion's share of aid from the Saudis. [1]
Frustrated by the enormously destructive warlord feuding in Afghanistan, including the Hebi Islami shelling of Kabul in April 1992, Pakistan abandoned HIG for the Taliban in 1994. HIG was expelled from Kabul by the Taliban in September 1996 and many of its local commanders joined the Taliban "both out of ideological sympathy and for reason of tribal solidarity." [2] In Pakistan Hezb-e-Islami training camps "were taken over by the Taliban and handed over" to Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) groups such as the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP). [3]
Hekmatyar opposed the 2001 American attack on the Taliban and continues to fight the American-supported Karzai government. Prior to Afghanistan's 2004 elections 150 members of the Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin party were reported to have defected to Hamid Karzai's administration.[4]
The HIG has previously had operations in Pakistan, and is now said to have allied with Mullah Omar and the remnant Taliban. One recent report estimated that HIG and the Taliban now command a comparable number of fighters.[citation needed] The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism reports that having lost Saudi support when it supported Saddam Hussein and Pakistani support after 1994, "the remainder of Hizb-i Islmi merged into al-Qaeda and the Taliban."[5] Radio Free Europe reports that "in 2006, Hekmatyar appeared in a video aired on the Arabic language Al-Jazeera television station and declared he wanted his forces to fight alongside Al-Qaeda." [6]
According to Le Monde newspaper it is currently active around Mazari Sharif and Jalalabad[7].
[edit] Selected explanations of the relation between Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin and Guantanamo captives
Originally the Bush Presidency asserted it was not obliged to let any captives apprehended in Afghanistan know why they were being held, or to provide a venue where they could challenge the allegations against them. However, the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Rasul v. Bush required the institution of a review. The Supreme Court recommended the reviews be modeled after the Army Regulation 190-8 Tribunals that were ordinarily used to determine whether captives were innocent civilians who should be released, lawful combatants entitled to Prisoner of War status, or war criminals who could be tried, and who weren't protected by all the provisions of the Geneva Conventions.
The Department of Defense set up the Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants (OARDEC). OARDEC administered an initial Combatant Status Review Tribunal for the 558 Guantanamo captives who were still in the detention camp as of August 2004. Unlike the AR 190-8 Tribunals, the Combatant Status Review Tribunals were not authorized to determine whether captives were entitled to POW status, only whether they were "enemy combatants. OARDEC also administered annual Administrative Review Board hearings. The Boards were only authorized to make a recommendation as to whether captives might represent an ongoing threat, or might continue to hold intelligence value, and therefore should continue to be held in US custody.
Close to 10,000 pages of documents from the Combatant Status Review Tribunals and Administrative Review Board hearings were released after contested Freedom of Information Act requests.
Dozens of captives faced allegations that they had been associated with the Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin. Some of the documents just alleged that a captive was associated with Hezb-e-Islami, without explaining why this implied they were an "enemy combatant". Other documents did provide brief explanations as how an association with Hezb-e-Islami implied a captive was an "enemy combatant". Neither Hezb-e-Islami nor Hezb-e-Islami Gulbuddin are on the U.S. State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations and they never have been;[8] neither are they on the additional list called "Groups of Concern."[9]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Bergen, Peter L., Holy war, Inc. : inside the secret world of Osama bin Laden, New York : Free Press, c2001., p.69
- ^ The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism, Olivier Roy, Antoine Sfeir, editors, (2007), p.133
- ^ Rashid, Taliban, (2000), p.92
- ^ Commanders Line Up Behind Karzai. Institute for War & Peace Reporting (September 14, 2004). Retrieved on January 15, 2007.
- ^ The Columbia World Dictionary of Islamism, Olivier Roy, Antoine Sfeir, editors, (2007), p.133
- ^ Afghanistan: Skeptics Urge Caution Over Purported Hekmatyar Cease-Fire July 19, 2007
- ^ Le Monde.fr : Les zones d'influence talibanes en Afghanistan
- ^ "2001 Report on Foreign Terrorist Organizations", "Fact Sheet: Foreign Terrorist Organizations List" October 23, 2002, "Fact Sheet: Foreign Terrorist Organizations List" January 30, 2003, "Fact Sheet: Foreign Terrorist Organization Designations Table" December 30, 2004, "Fact Sheet:Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs)" October 11, 2005, "Country Reports on Terrorism: Chapter 8 -- Foreign Terrorist Organizations" April 28, 2006
- ^ "U.S. Designates Foreign Terrorist Organizations: List includes 42 groups, 43 others deemed “of concern”" April 30, 2007
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abdullah Mujahid's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 206
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Haji Hamidullah's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 242
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Alif Mohammed's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 113-122
- ^ a b Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Adel Hassan Hamad's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 244
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Mahbub Rahman's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 90
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Juma Din's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 261
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Taj Mohammed's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 142
- ^ a b Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Mohammed Quasam's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 23-29
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Akhtar Mohammed's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 46-53
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Nasrullah's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 1
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abdul Zahor's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 322-335
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abdul Ghaffar's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 13-25 - August 2005
- ^ a b Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Jumma Jan Administrative Review Board - page 105-107 - April 4, 2005
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Jumma Jan's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 41-52
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf) from Sharbat's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 36-40
- ^ Summary of Evidence memo (.pdf) prepared for Taj Mohammed's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - November 12, 2004 - page 64
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Abdul Zahor's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 1-6
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Mohammad Gul's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - - mirror - pages 1-12
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf) from Sharifullah's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 79-97
- ^ " Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abdul Majid Muhammed's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 90-97
- ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Lufti Bin Swei Lagha Administrative Review Board - page 45
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Nazargul Chaman's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 51-63 - September 2005
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Mohammed Nasim's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 54
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Sabar Lal Melma's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 248 - August 10, 2005
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Haji Nasrat Khan's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 257-265
- ^ Summary of Evidence (.pdf), from Mohamed Jawad's Combatant Status Review Tribunal October 19, 2004 - page 149
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Juma Din's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 38-44
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Akhtiar Mohammad'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 43-52
- ^ Summary of Evidence memo (.pdf) prepared for Faiz Ullah's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - October 15, 2004 - page 89
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Faiz Ullah's Administrative Review Board hearing - page 174
- ^ Summary of Evidence memo (.pdf) prepared for Rahmatullah Sangaryar's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - October 19, 2004 - page 60
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Hamidullah'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 89-101
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Mohammed Mussa Yakubi's Administrative Review Board hearing - pages 298-314
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Mohammed Mustafa Sohail's Combatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 24-34
- ^ Summarized transcripts (.pdf), from Haji Nasrat Khan'sCombatant Status Review Tribunal - pages 17-25
- ^ Summarized transcript (.pdf), from Abdul Razak's Administrative Review Board hearing - December 16, 2005 - page 64
- ^ Factors for and against the continued detention (.pdf) of Gholam Ruhani Administrative Review Board, May 2, 2005 - page 54
|