User talk:Hersfold/Archive 14 (February 2008)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| ← Previous archive - Archive 14 (February 2008) - Next archive → |
This page contains discussions dated during the month of February 2008 from User talk:Hersfold. Please direct all current discussions there. Thank you.
February 1-21
reply
sounds great! i've got settled back into school pretty well now and have classes well in hand. i'm still looking for a project to get involved with but maybe i'll find one as we go :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katieishme (talk • contribs) 18:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, great! I'll get things ready to go for you and let you know once they're posted. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
i use safari and firefox :) Katie (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I got the assignments up :) Sorry again it took a few days. I've just finished my first round of examinations. I'm still having a bit of trouble with this one but I think I've got it. cheers! Katie (talk) 16:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, I figured it was something school-related. I've actually got an exam tomorrow in my least favorite class, which I really need to be studying for, but I can take a quick break. I'll post a reply to your responses and get the next half up. Hope your exams went well! Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your help! ZAPMUT (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
Would you respond to my statement regarding your decision for deletion?
Elicrichton (talk) 03:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Request for speedy deletion of Loch Fyne (restaurant)
Hi.
Could you allow a little more time before requesting speedy deletion of a brand new stub article. We are not all speed typers, and two minutes isn't that long to construct an article sufficient to justify its own existence. -- Chris j wood (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Be more than glad to. Sorry, I didn't realize you were still working on the article. Good luck with it! Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: Alias user page
Thanks for the info. Entbark (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: speedway leagues
I'm just filling in missing data. Seasons 1967-1976 are all filled in and no-one is deleting them so i don't know why people keep wanting to delete the info? It takes ages to format it so i'm just getting the basic data down first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rml123 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's really best to get the article properly written before posting it in the mainspace. By posting the rough data only, it looks like jumbled nonsense and can be speedily deleted. Try developing your article in a subpage as I suggested; it may take longer, but it'll save you having to start over and risk getting blocked. Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to format it like previous seasons but that will take me all night. I was thinking that if i got the basic data down someone who is a computer whizzkid could format it quickly for me - instead i get people instantly trying to remove it! Seems a bit unfair on people who like me who are not experienced enough to know how to format everything. Every time i put spaces in and preview it the wikipedia takes the spaces out again!!! Now i've confirmed that's not jumbled nonsense, can it now be left alone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rml123 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- If you'd like, I can try to develop a template that will make things easier for you. It'll generate a table that formats the data so it doesn't look like gibberish. I'll try to format 1979 now.
- By the way, please remember to sign you posts on talk pages with four tildes. (~~~~). Thanks! Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
--Rml123 (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC) i'm getting rules and warnings coming in from all angles here, not as easy as i thought it was going to be. But your offer of help is very welcome.
- Sure. I'll start working on the template later tonight. Don't forget to look for some additional info for the articles. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
--Rml123 (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Hi the other guy has done a format and so it looks a bit better now see also seasons 1977 and 1979. I intended to add a little introduction at the top because i was basically trying to mimic the style of the articles of 1965-1976, but you all jumped on me before i got the chance!!!
Big Brother Help
REcently you responded to my problem with the Big Brother 9 page. I still maintain that watching a live feed is not verifiable! The changes are being made based on these lives feeds! Can you help me create a REQUEST FOR COMMENT? I've never done this before. One of the editors is starting to get PERSONAL... calling me names, and I don't want things to get out of hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RMThompson (talk • contribs) 22:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ideally, this should be done yourself. The page at WP:RFC provides instructions on how to do this; it's not very difficult. Before you do this, however, I do recommend you step back from the situation for a short while. You are getting rather excitable, which isn't helping matters. "Bub" isn't an offensive name, and while that editor was certainly being sarcastic, he wasn't out to insult you. Please remember to assume good faith and treat the situation with civility. Try keeping the CAPS LOCK turned off so people don't think you're shouting, and look at the situation one more time. If you still need help with the RFC, I will start it up for you later tonight. I'd prefer you be the one to do it, however, as I'm not really involved in the situation. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Valentine card
Hersfold, Happy Valentine's Day!Kitty53 (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- I want one. Cremepuff222 (talk) 22:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
"Extremism" - and "The notion of 'extremism'"
The reason for my recreation of the page under the different title (and for the associated redirect) is that it is at least highly (if, perhaps, not "extremely") controversial to assert, or imply or assume that there actually exists a phenomenon appropriately characterized as "extremism".
I appreciate that I may not have chosen the best way of addressing this diffculty. I would be grateful if you would advise me accordingly.
Regards,
LJ
Left justified (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- There are certain naming conventions that have to be followed when titling pages - Someone isn't likely to search for "The notion of "x"", just "x" itself. Likewise, the inclusion of the title in "quotes" could cause searches to malfunction or create technical errors. For ideological theories such as extremism, it is understood that there may not actually be a definitive example of it anywhere; the purpose of the article is to describe the foundations of the theory and how it could be or has been applied. Also, Wikipedia may contain controversial or offensive information. This is an inherent risk in trying to create an encyclopedia on a wide range of topics. Trying to censor this may be considered vandalism in certain cases. I hope this helps. Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your rapid response. It helps to clarify matters, but of course it doesn't solve or help to solve the problem. When you write "ideological theories such as extremism" do you mean that "extremism" (if it exists) is an "ideological theory" or that the notion that "extremism" exists is an "ideological theory"? It is of course in any case questionable whether there is such a thing as an "ideological theory" - ideologies aren't scientific hypotheses, although (notoriously) some ideologies pretend to be.
If one entitles an article "extremism" without scare quotes (or at least something which comes close to doing the job of scare quotes) one is tacitly endorsing an ideological position, whether one is conscious of doing so or not. The very use of the word "extremism" is question-begging. It isn't that "there isn't a definitive example of it anywhere." That would be merely contingent. It would be just a case of there happening not to be an example of "extremism" anywhere. The problem is that the very notion of "extremism" is incoherent. Therefore there couldn't be an example of it anywhere.
There can be very few things - I would say that there is in fact nothing - more damaging to clarity than a failure to use quotation marks correctly where they are necessary. If there are technical difficulties in the way of so using them then those difficulties really need to be overcome.
With regard to someone's searching on the term "extremism" wouldn't such a search come up with, for example, an article entitled "The notion of 'extremism'" if there were such an article? And, if not, why not?
I would be grateful if you could suggest some practical means to address this problem.
Regards,
Left justified (talk) 00:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Just to make things clear, I'm not debating the merits or even the existence of extremism or any other of a whole host of -isms, I'm simply trying to explain how things work. As Wikipedia functions on consensus, you are welcome to start a discussion about this, however there is nothing you or I alone can do to change this.
- I should also note that simply having an article on something does not express an endorsement of it. Wikipedia has an article on Extremism, but we also have one at Moderation. We have an articles on Nazism and Communism but also Democracy and Capitalism. We have, of course, an article on Wikipedia, but also an article on the site whose sole purpose is to make fun of Wikipedia, Uncyclopedia. One of the foundations of Wikipedia is that it tries to maintain a neutral point of view at all times. If an article is for some reason non neutrally written, it has a problem that requires correction. To insert your own point of view without backing it up with reliable, verifiable sources is likewise a problem. It is for this reason I have just rolled back your most recent edits to Extremism.
- As for the search issue, the best answer is this: Wikipedia's search sucks. Badly. If you don't spell an article's title exactly correct, or your capitalization is off even slightly, and someone hasn't created a redirect in anticipation of the specific typo you made, you get a search that quite often yields no results, or at least very unhelpful ones. Titles such as "The notion of extremism" also imply a certain point of view, which as I've already said, isn't acceptable. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
With respect, the fact that you cite the existence of an article on "moderation" as if that somehow counterbalances the existence of an article on "extremism" shows that you have entirely failed to appreciate the issue here. There is something very questionable about talk of (political) "moderation" - precisely the same as what is questionable about talk of "extremism". These are the two sides of the same counterfeit coin. The entire language of "moderate/extremist" is tendentious and propagandist(ic).
I consider it a slander to suggest that I was merely inserting my own point of view. If I had been doing so I would have phrased things differently. Contrary to what you claim, it is tendentious, it is not compatible with a neutral point of view, to endorse the notion that extremism is a tenable concept by presenting the word as a title and without any caveat.
It is simply bizarre to suggest that the title "the notion of 'extremism'" implies a certain point of view whereas the title "extremism" does not. All that the former does is imply that there is more than one point of view, which is undoubtedly the case. Someone who fully endorses the notion of extremism can still quite happily refer to the notion or concept of extremism. That doesn't in any way imply that the notion or concept is not coherent or tenable or valid or sound.
Again, your citing communism, Nazism, democracy and capitalism suggests that you have simply failed to comprehend the issue here. There is no comparable difficulty or controversy as to whether communism, capitalism and Nazism are usable notions or concepts. There is of course plenty of "controversy" (and then some) over whether communism, capitalism, Nazism, etc. are "good things", but that is a different issue. (The notion of "democracy" is a bit trickier, and I'd be inclined to think it inappropriate to have an article entitled "democracy" without a (so to speak) question mark against the concept.
Perhaps I should try to express this in terms of a concrete example. One might be this - it is not controversial or tendentious to describe Lenin as a "communist", but it would be to describe his as an "extremist" (or, indeed, as a "moderate"). Those who admire, or even idolise, Lenin, and those who revile him, can on both sides acknowledge that he was a communist. But to describe him as an "extremist" would be to characterise him unfavourably. Likewise those who regard Henry Ford as an evil exploiter and oppressor, or by contrast those who regard him as a great and noble man, could on both sides I think comfortably describe him as a capitalist. That is, the word "capitalist" is relatively value-neutral, whereas for example the term "free enterprise" used in place of "capitalism" would not be value-neutral. One would not speak of "free enterprise" unless one supported capitalism. "Capitalism" tends to be used pejoratively but is not necessarily so used. I haven't checked yet, but if there is a Wikipedia article entitled (without any caveats) "free enterprise" I would be outraged.
You purport to invoke the neutral point-of-view. The whole point here is that the very terminology of "moderate" and "extremist" encapsulates a tendentious, non-neutral point of view (in a way in which "capitalist", "communist", "socialist" etc. do not).
So . . . still unresolved.
Regards,
LJ
Left justified (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
It just now occurs to me that the most succinct way of expressing this is to say that the language of "moderation/extremism" is loaded whereas the language of "right/left" or "capitalism/socialism" is by and large not (although I suppose "loaded" is just a more vernacular way of saying "tendentious").
Regards,
Left justified (talk) 02:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- I believe part of the problem is that I'm not really understanding what your point is. I am a Computer Science major, and have never taken any course on psychology, sociology, existentialism, or anything of the like, so this could be part of the issue. If it isn't, that just goes to show how much more I am missing or misunderstanding the point. We title our pages based on what they are about - hence, the article on extremism is titled "Extremism" and so on. We have a guideline on having no disclaimers in articles, as they are redundant to the five official disclaimers linked to at the bottom of every page and violate other policies, including some things that Wikipedia is not (censored, among others). Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation do not support or endorse any person, group, product, ideal, etc. that they may happen to have an article about. I certainly do not intend to insult you, and I do apologize if that is how you took my comments. Should you wish to continue this discussion with the community at large, I recommend you either bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions, Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view, or the talk page of one of our other policies or guidelines. I'm sorry I wasn't able to clearly explain things to you, but hopefully you'll be able to get a broader perspective at one of those venues. Happy editing. Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Bertrand Russell
That's great news - I thought you'd forgotten :) I'm still only too happy to nominate you for RFA whenever you like, just let me know - it is in no way dependent on the Russell article, don't feel pressured to do it. Neıl ☎ 21:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know, but I would very much love to make a point of having improved this article at my next RfA. It's more of a personal pride thing at this point. ;-) Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Kahtmayan AfD and Exir
Can you do the Afd of exir for me? This is my first afd and i think i have screwed around enough :P. (I was doing the afd for an hour and half i think). First time jitters, will appreciate the help. Thank You, Weltanschaunng 13:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks! Well actually its {{subst:afd}} instead of {{afd}}. Found it out when the code was showing on the article. Weltanschaunng 13:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
I visited the twinkle page, and it scared me a bit. I really have no experience on AfDs or CSDs, so as of now I will let it be. Weltanschaunng 14:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Your userpage
Your userpage is too big for screens sized 1024x768 (Runs off the page). Could you please make it a little less wide? Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- I tried having a lower-resolution page for a while, but deleted it as it was annoying having to work two different versions. I can try to set up another one of those, however my resolution is set much higher, and to make my userpage fit the smaller resolutions would require a lot of re-coding, so I'm probably going to keep the main one as it is. I'll let you know when I've got the changes done. Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, it's a lot less work than I thought it would be. How's it look? Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Looks good. Thanks! Malinaccier Public (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Infobox parameter not there
Hi there, thank you for clearing the stuff for me. Although it would have been much better to also know what parameter or stuff I had done wrong in the Infoxbox . Would have taken care of that as well. Thanx for clearing it up though [[User:Shirishag75|Shirishag75]] (talk) 17:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- The changes are recorded in the article's history - I think you had a "frequently updated =" parameter in there which wasn't having any effect. Glad to have been of help. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Hey, would you mind if I stole your AFC barnstar to use on a project I am working on? Thanks, Tiddly-Tom 19:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- If I had, I wouldn't have licensed it the way I did. Go on ahead. :-) Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
AfC
Gah!! You keep beating me! ;) WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 21:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I could say the same. That's the third edit conflict I've had that's your fault. :-P Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Bwahaha! Well, it is kind of your fault for sending me that newsletter... WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 21:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, well then! How's this: You work from the bottom, I'll work from the top. Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Would that work? I mean, wouldn't it still conflict? WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 21:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, well then! How's this: You work from the bottom, I'll work from the top. Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:53, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Bwahaha! Well, it is kind of your fault for sending me that newsletter... WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 21:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Ok then, I'll do that next time... WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 21:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
Since you did most of the work...
 |
The Articles for Creation Barnstar | |
| For virtually clearing the backlog at WP:AfC single-handedly, I give you this barnstar. Well done, and glad I could help! WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 22:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC) |
- Thanks. :-) I'm just glad we were finally able to finish that mess. It felt really good taking off the backlog banner. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Heh. I know what you mean. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN that one guy who buried stuff 22:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
I really appreciate it. -FlubecaTalk 22:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
February 22-29
Thanks
Thanks for the help. I don't really know what exactly I need help with I just all around "need help". you get what i mean right??? EGGNOG107* (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- I do indeed, and that's exactly what Adopt-a-User will help you out with. Since you're waiting on an adopter, you're welcome to look few some of my adoption lessons to pass the time - I'm not sure what your adopter is going to have you do, but these lessons should help give you a head start. Hersfold (t/a/c) 02:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Request
Hey Hersfold, I have two requests/questions to ask you. One is pulling on your expert template work, I recently create this template, but when i place it on my userpage it overlaps the rollback logo in the top right section, I tried and tried but could not figure out how to get it to move left. I was wondering if you could fix that for me? Also i noticed that you have a great adoption program, I have recently adopted a few new users and have been thinking about creating lessons myself, I was wondering if it would be okay to use some of the content/ideas from your lessons to help create mine, I understand if you do not want me to, as it is your work and all. Thanks, Tiptoety talk 03:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sure! I'd recommend using the same code I use for my Barnstar ribbon numbers. This will knock things around beyond what they're already doing as a result of the templates. Try copying this onto your user page:
<span style="position:relative; left: -28px; top: 5px;">{{AFC ribbon}}</span> {{Rollback}}
- I've checked, and it should work in both Firefox and IE. Safari usually does what Firefox does, in case that's what you're using. If you ever decide to add more stuff up top as I've seen other people do, it's the same code, you just play with the numbers until things go where you want them.
- As for the adoption lessons, I would be honored. Plus, you know what they tell you when you first sign in - "don't contribute anything you don't want mercilessly torn apart by other editors." Please help yourself, and make sure to let me know if I've missed anything or have a mistake. Thanks for the compliments. :-) Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
RE: Re: User talk:Ampersand17
Hey thanks for telling me, I'm not very experience in anything aobut admins so it's good to know.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 05:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
Do I not get a WP:AfC barnstar?! I did just as much work as User:Compwhizii ;-) - Take care! ScarianCall me Pat 09:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
re: Ready to move on
Hey! Almost ready. Still working with this stuff a bit if that's ok. Sorry somehow my password wouldn't reset so have had some issues getting logged in. Should be good now :) I should be ready by Monday for next project :D Katie (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, when you're ready to move on, take a look at the lesson book and let me know what you're interested in doing next. If you'd like to see something I don't have listed there, let me know and I'll try to get a lesson put together. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the help! The userbox's removed now, because it turns out that the logo was a copyrighted image, but I've gotta thank you for the advice. Cheers! SlightlyMadwanna si-ign? 21:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome - sorry it got deleted, but I guess that's why so many of the band ones use text instead of pictures. Oh well. Hersfold (t/a/c) 00:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Please don't make me jump through hoops
I added the image of Steve Wright because I think it is important. Yes, the images were taken my serving police officers of the UK. The image is also widely publicised. I really can't be bothered to deal with wiki-bureaucracy, but I also feel the image deserves to stay as a matter of public interest.
Is it possible that you take this 'fight' for me, because all I am interested in is adding information to Wikipedia and not removing it due to pettiness. Thanks. Blammermouth (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but these aren't rules I've set. Since Wikipedia is itself under a free license, the GFDL, all content on the site has to strictly adhere to copyright law. As I said, you are welcome to ask at the media copyright questions desk for more information, and you are also welcome to contest the deletion by following the instructions given on the deletion template. As I don't completely know the situation with this person or the image, I feel I am ill suited to take up this 'fight,' as you call it, for you. I understand your wish to contribute, and thank you for your efforts, however there are policies that have to be followed for the protection of the project. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
I give up then. I tried to give. WP is too much work. I'll tag the photos I've taken in the interest of WP for deletion, because I really can not be bothered. Note Freston Tower, Alton Water for a couple that I think would be a shame to lose. Oh well, as you say. Blammermouth (talk) 01:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've tagged most of the articles / photos I have created as CSD now. Thanks for your insight. Blammermouth (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- I do hope you reconsider. The articles you provided are useful and there is no reason to delete them, or the images they use, over a simple problem with an unrelated image. I am trying to be helpful and show you how to correct the problem, and this is frankly a very rude and offensive way of responding to that help. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
I am simply taking back all that I have offered to WP. Blammermouth (talk) 01:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- I will add that it is not your fault Hersfold, but the politics of this system do not make me want to contribute. And as apparent, make me want to withdraw every contribution I have made. I do not blame you. Blammermouth (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
re: Hackers on the Help Desk (oh my!)
While that guy probably wasn't in it for the good of things, and while you're obviously right in saying that the help desk isn't the right place for it, who knows, maybe he was wanting to be a white hat and help wikipedia with any security problems we may have. Heh, but I doubt it. Anyway, good job helping people on the help desk, happy editing, --Evan ¤ Seeds 07:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Heh. Highly doubtful, but who knows... Thanks, see you around. Hersfold (t/a/c) 07:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Queen
Read the Wikipedia guideline page on Notability. It states that the song in question must have an objective independent source claiming it to be notable. This song has nothing of the sort. It is simply a cover, despite the difference in lyrics, and should be deleted after being merged more properly.
BTW, congrats on your high score on the Wikiholic test. I got a 2096 after taking it. OPTIMAL! ;) Kodster (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- I did read the guideline, and I do believe it is notable. It says "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts [...] are probably notable." This song, as the remix, has ranked on two national top ten lists, and was the artist's third song to have done so. This song, as the remix, also appeared in a notable film. We have sources to verify that information, so it has and demonstrates notability outside of the original Queen version.
- Thanks - I retake it every now and then, but since they keep trimming the test down, my score keeps getting lower. It's kind of odd. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
internetisseriousbusiness.com
It's a window that moves around the screen and shows about 30 successive pop-ups when you try to close it. Thanks, George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp and assistance 20:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Ralph Heikkinen
Thanks for taking the time to review the Ralph Heikkinen article, and for the helpful comments on improving it.Cbl62 (talk) 05:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Image
I noticed that the image in the top left of your user page has a background colour that is different to the background it is set against. I have edited the image in photoshop and uploaded it to commons. Here it is:
My version matches the background you have the original image set against. Thanks, George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp and assistance 19:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I hadn't really thought of doing that - the image was based on the UN Flag, which uses the lighter shade of blue. I'll see how it looks. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thanks, George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp and assistance 19:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Smithfield
Many thanks for your improvement and review of Smithfield, London. I'm starting a new job in a few days time and unfortunately it's very unlikely I'll be able to make the changes you suggested within one week. --DarTar (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that. Is there anyone else who you could get to work on the article? You've still got a few days to make the changes. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments on Manga GAC
I put a reply on the manga talk page about your comments. You might be aware (or might not) that I wrote and referenced most of the article, at least prior to recent two months or so when a wide variety of folks have tried to fix the article (and usually only introduced more errors). I'm also on record in several places as opposing the FAC and GAC nominations of this article. It has more problems than you can shake a stick at. I will not be editing or working on the article again -- it's a completely thankless task that has produced only screaming and yelling among a variety of editors. Consensus? No way. If you or anyone else wants to improve this article, you'll have to do it yourself. Sorry if I sound fed up, but I am fed up. This article isn't worth the effort keeping the kobolds at bay. I have other things to do. Timothy Perper (talk) 22:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'd noticed you were rather vehemently refusing to do anything on the talk page. Sorry it's turned you off so much. Hopefully my comments will get through someone's head, although it's not the sort of article I'd be likely to edit - I don't read manga and frankly know little about it. Happy editing elsewhere, anyway! Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for barnstar
I put in a few hours of obsessive compulsive work at the WP:AFC backlog; you rewarded me with a barnstar. Others, including yourself, did much more. Well done for clearing the backlog. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 23:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Ribbon numbers
Hello...I have been playing around with the ribbon numbers, but I can't seem to get them to not leave a gap. Could you possibly show me another way to get the number superimposed on the ribbon without leaving a big gap? I have a ribbon table on my user page that I am trying to shorten a bit. - LA @ 09:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't know of any way to do this so that the number won't leave a "footprint" of itself somewhere. I've kind of reduced the impact of this somewhat with my awards, where I have all the numbers set up in a different row so it just looks as though I intentionally left a margin between the ribbons and actual barnstars. You could likely do the same with yours - just make an invisible column to the right side, and nudge things around from there. Here's a short sample in case that's not overly clear:
| Award | Giver | Date | This cell would be blank, but I'm leaving it filled for demonstration |
|---|---|---|---|
 |
MiraLuka | 10:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC) |  Ditto |
| Uncke Herb | 02:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC) |
- I hope that's close to what you're looking for? Hersfold (t/a/c) 12:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- It works...Thanks! - LA @ 14:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Ribbon suggestion
Could you please create ribbons for the following items if possible for Wikipedia Barnstars: 25 DYK, 50 DYK, 100 DYK, 200 DYK, Olympics, and WikiLove/ WikiSmile? I would greatly appreciate it. Chris (talk) 15:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, you don't ask much, do you? Just kidding - I'll try to have the ribbons done later tonight or tomorrow. I'll post on your talk page when they're ready for use. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- No problem, actually I've just finished them. I do have one question, though - the WikiSmile isn't really an award, so I'm not really sure if it needs a ribbon. I'm more than happy to design one if you wish, it'll probably be a yellow-black striped thing, I just wanted to point that out.
- As for the rest, here are the links, which will be blue shortly - I just have to upload the lot. Since it fit with the general DYK theme, I also designed a ribbon for the DYK Medal, in case you're interested. Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
-
 |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| In an effort to help other users with creating ribbons in place of the Barnstars they have earned, I award you the RAOK Barnstar as a matter of thanks. Chris (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
Re:Help Desk
Thanks for the update! I've replied on the help desk page.-- Diniz (talk) 23:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
