Talk:Herbert W. Armstrong/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Start-class to B-class
Has multiple thorough sections, and extensive references. I understand the person lowering it to Start-class says there are POV issues -- that may or may not be, I didn't look very thoroughly, but doesn't make the difference, you'll notice the Quality scale specifically mentions the possibility of NPOV issues under B-Class. This isn't a GA review, just an assessment, and the differences between Stub, Start, and B are usually pretty obvious. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- I had lowered it based on the following statements;
- "Start class: The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element."
- "B class: Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process."
I consider it weak in reliable third party sources (currently it relies almost exclusively on pro-Armstrong references), the POV, the Original research, and the lack of any meaningful content about the highly controversial nature of his teachings and personal life. It's really not of the highest quality. Pairadox 20:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
