Talk:Henry the Hexapus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Great photo! Cute 'pus. A little mollusk (talk) 20:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's the only photo of the Hexapus right now, but yeah, the thing is strutting his stuff. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 20:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for saving the cute quote, Squishy Vic. If seeing that great film with Jerry Lewis and Leslie Caron didn't make me want to head straight for Blackpool, this sure does. A little mollusk (talk) 04:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, all noteworthy and appropriate content is worth keeping as long as it's well formatted. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 05:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] A bit unclear
The sources make it appear that this creature is a specimen of an "ordinary" octopus species (which would normally have eight legs) that "suffers" from an abnormality of some sort (a "birth defect"), as opposed to the first example of a new species of cephalopod which have six rather than eight legs. --EngineerScotty (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's what the source says, so that's what I put. I think this animal is the start of a new species, hence the Hexapus, but it hasn't yet been established as a whole new species in these two sources, rather as an octopus that had a birth defect and instead was born a hexapus. Feel free to contribute, though. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 06:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was just going by the source; it never said that a new Hexapus species couldn't be created. Besides, I wasn't the one who added the taxobox. But anyway, thanks for your lazy sourcing. Don't worry, I fixed it up for you. :-) —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 23:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- I understand your point here. how do we know that this is not how some new species might occasionally evolve? it's interesting in the sense of major anatomical change to a well-known species. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Even if this birth defect was hereditary, it wouldn't prevent Henry from breeding with other octupuses, and it wouldn't create a new species. Species don't form unless you have two populations within the species that stop breeding with each other (usually because they're geographically separated.) <eleland/talkedits> 22:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- That's right, I remember learning about that. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 08:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- That's what I was getting at, but I was never trying to push my own theory or whatever. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 17:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Christened?
I'm not sure about the use of this word - what's wrong with named?. It links to a disambiguation page anyway.Zain Ebrahim (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Someone removed it anyway, since it's irrelevant now since it's just a single Hexapus and we don't have to repeat what's already in the title. Also, though, the source said christened instead of named. Either way is fine, but I like to keep stuff as close to the source as possible, which is why I used christened. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 23:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Indeed, but like I said, I followed the source. Maybe they did baptize Henry ... :-P —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 17:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Yeah - total immersion in air. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 10:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Trivia moved from article
Text removed: The only other known instance of a hexapus was a fictional six-legged octopus that appeared in the 1955 film It Came from Beneath the Sea. Since this science fiction film had a very small budget, the designers left off two legs to meet the budget constraints.[1]
"The only other known instance of a hexapus" is one that did not, in fact, exist. Therefore, I'm moving the text here. I don't think this subject is big enough to justify having its own "Trivia" or "hexapods in fiction" section. If the article grows and/or a consensus is found that this piece of trivia should be included, I'll happily agree to its re-inclusion. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 19:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- It, at the very least, shows that there was some other six-legged octopus before Henry, even if fictional creation. And it adds a little color to the article. A little mollusk (talk) 21:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
I see nothing wrong with adding it. So what if it's not large? There was another instance where people might go "Hey, look, a Hexapus!" I say we include it, but whichever way it goes is fine with me. —Victor, Sr. (discussion) (contributions) 05:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
