Talk:Henry Pering Pellew Crease

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Henry Pering Pellew Crease has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on June 10, 2007.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 2, 2007 Good article nominee Not listed July 8, 2007 Good article nominee Listed October 19, 2007 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

	Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is part of the Political parties and politicians in Canada WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
	British Columbia Portal This article is part of the British Columbia WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

Contents 1 Biography assessment rating comment 2 Judge's Bench Book Notes of Hall Trial 3 Failed GA nomination 4 Passed GA 5 Successful good article nomination 6 GA Sweeps (kept)

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 16:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Followed the 11 steps, so let's see if it's good.Stevecudmore 03:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Judge's Bench Book Notes of Hall Trial

These notes may have content useful for this article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Failed GA nomination

My primary reasons for failing this GA nomination is because the article looks a bit short (I think you could write more about an Attorney General and Supreme Court justice), and also because there are a lack of in-line citations in the article. Please see WP:REF, and take a look at the referencing style of some other GA articles. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Passed GA

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 8, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Yes

2. Factually accurate?: Yes

3. Broad in coverage?: Yes

4. Neutral point of view?: Yes

5. Article stability? Yes

6. Images?: Yes

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — bobanny 07:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps (kept)

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 13:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)