Talk:Help! (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Wa-do (Thank you in Cherokee)
Estrose. Thanks for adding the info box to the article. It really improved the look and feel of the page. --Bookofsecrets 14:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DVD-less in America
The story of why the movie is not on DVD (at least in the US) might be interesting, if anyone knows it. Unfortunately, I don't. Gaohoyt 16:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Well it's being released now. The American DVD released has been pushed back 7 days from Oct 30th 2007 to Nov 6th 2007. I don't have time to include a source for this info but anyone who checks with online stores can see it's true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.19.241.129 (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Images
The picture shown (of a DVD!! cover) is not appropriate for an article about a film. Does anyone have a more suitable image, e.g. the original film poster (preferably the British one, whose design ties in with the LP cover) Emeraude 22:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia: credit music
"In the ending of the film, the song played over the credits is The Barber of Seville written by Italian composer Gioachino Rossini." The Barber of Seville is a complete opera by itself, so I assume the piece (not "song") played is an excerpt, possibly the overture. I watched the movie only once, years ago, so I don't feel qualified to correct this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.59.73.29 (talk) 23:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia: disguise scene
Should it be noted that except for Paul, the Beatles' disguises look like the individual members after the band split up? I know it it's probably just a coincidence but George and especially Ringo and John look like they eventually did in their solo careers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.248.36.9 (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Beatles - You're Going To Lose That Girl.jpg
Image:Beatles - You're Going To Lose That Girl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Beatles in Bahamas.jpg
Image:Beatles in Bahamas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Beatles with Eleanor Bron.jpg
Image:Beatles with Eleanor Bron.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] first trivia bullet
Because trivia sections are basically irrelevant and the first bullet is very unimportant and silly, does anyone have a problem with me deleting it? Wonderwallmusic (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Looks almost like original research and a bit of synthesis to me; no objection if it goes. The reader/viewer can draw their own conclusions if they need to, but we shouldn't do it for them. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 22:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)