Talk:Hellingly Hospital Railway
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Hellingly Hospital Railway is currently a good article nominee. Anyone who has not contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article, as outlined on the nominations page.
Reviewers: To start the review process, follow this link to create a dedicated subpage for the review. (If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try purging this talk page.) Date: 18:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the Sussex WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Sussex in South East England. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.) |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance for Sussex-related articles. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
[edit] B class assessment
Does the article have:
A particularly useful picture or graphic? Yes.
Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic? Yes
A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic? Yes
Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article? Yes
Article seems to cover the subject well, with no major omissions. Therefore I'm happy to grade this as B class. Mjroots (talk) 08:28, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
