Talk:Helen Clifton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I've added plenty of sources to establish notability and removed the PROD template, which I don't believe should have been added in the first place. To quote WP:PROD
Proposed deletion is a deletion process that allows users to add a template ({{prod}}) to an article (and in some circumstances, user pages) to nominate it for deletion. This process should only be used for articles that are uncontroversial deletion candidates that obviously do not belong in the encyclopedia but do not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. If any user objects then the article may be taken to Articles for Deletion to be discussed.
As the article was not nonsense and a 2 second Google search turns up hundreds of potential references - I don't understand how someone could evaluate this article as failing WP:BIO. Paxse 18:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- The addition of the links helps. But the article still needs some work. As it is currently written it tells us that she was born, educated, and married. It doesn't actually state what makes her notable in her field. This could perhaps be remedied by a rewrite of the lead sentence. The entries on Emma Churchill or Robin Dunster, for example, state the key accomplishment in the first sentence or two. Addere 13:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)