User talk:Hektor/Archive 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Independent evidence for Apollo Moon landings

I noticed that you voted early on this, and wanted to let you know that the article has substantially grown (and will likely grow further) into a useful list of evidence for the Moon landings that has nothing to do with hoax sites. I'd like to invite you to take another look, and to consider changing your vote. Gravitor 19:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logo german presidency.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo german presidency.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed merge of Independent evidence for Apollo Moon landings into Apollo Moon Landing Hoax Accusations

This is just to let you know that there is a merge proposal being considered at Independent evidence for Apollo Moon landings. Given that you participated in the AfD debate about this article, you might be interested in leaving your opinion concerning this merge on the talk page. Lunokhod 16:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Eatzis.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Eatzis.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CSTS

Hello, Hektor. It appears that you copied and pasted ACTS to CSTS. Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself using the move link at the top of the page, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you, cesarb 04:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Olympics WikiProject membership update

The Olympics WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #{{user|USERNAME}}, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

The Olympics WikiProject team

[edit] Olympic stadium Grenoble

Hi Hektor

I would like to know why you reverted my edit. There are good reasons to assume that my edit was correct. I am currently expanding the German article on the 1968 winter olympics to FA status. In all my sources - including the official report - it says that the opening ceremony took place in a temporary structure that was dismantled after the end of the games. It was certainly not the Stade Lesdiguières. --Voyager 20:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Elena

Hi, thanks for sorting that out. As you can see, I did some editing to that page and forgot to put that sentence back in. Apologies.

  • Thanks. I was suspecting that was the explanation. Hektor 21:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Bikini Carwash Company

Crossposted from User talk:Sandstein
  • There is a vote for deletion under way. I think you might be interested. Hektor 14:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks but, per the prohibition on votestacking, I should not have been contacted, because since I am the prodder, I must be expected to favour deletion. For that reason, I decline to participate. Sandstein 14:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Given the fact that I am in favor of keep, and have written so in the vote, I don't see where is the problem ? why are people always assuming bad faith. I just wrote to you because your archive was linked to this page. Hektor 14:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
      • My apologies. I did not see that. I'll try and remember to WP:AGF more next time. Sandstein 16:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Olympic medalists in disabled skiing

Please consider merging List of Olympic medalists in disabled skiing into Disabled skiing at the Winter Olympics. These were demonstration events only, so it is extremely misleading to have a "list of medalists" article as per all full-medal sports. We do not include any other demonstration "medalists" in that series of lists. Thanks, Andrwsc 21:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Indian human spaceflight program article - why it had been moved.

An entire article based on pure speculation is a rare example. It would better served as a sub-section ISRO main article.

  • NASA and Roscosmos, despite their unprecedented success, have human spaceflight summary within the main article section
  • Indian manned space programme (as of 12.02.07) is purely based on speculation
  • A manned spacecraft design programme is yet to announed
  • The article "Indian human spaceflight program" appears more as a hopeful idea, rather than factual page
  • The SCRE is a broadly general spacecraft recovery programme and is no concrete indication of a future spacecraft (i.e. - it could very well be incorporated into an unmanned recoverable sapcecraft, such as the Russian Parom.
  • Thus, the Indian human spaceflight programme piece will be best served under the ISRO relevant sub-section

So far the general feedback has been to merge the piece into ISRO (see Question of crewed missions) until a concreate manned space programme announcement is made by the Indian govt. Its not very good practice for an encyclopedic editor to force his/her personal opinion upon broader agreement which has already been made (see Talk:Indian Space Research Organisation).

Thus, the previous agreement should stand. Please open a new discussion to discuss restoration of the previous article if you still feel strongly about this. But please do not force your own decision on this issue.

Many thanks -- Ash sul 22:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Quote from one of the sources : "The Centre approval to India's manned mission to space finds expression in the Union Budget.

The Indian Space Research Organisation's "pre-project initiatives" to propel an Indian into space have been sanctioned Rs 50 crore for 2007-08.

Top ISRO sources said the flight is likely to be in 2015, followed by an Indian stepping on the Moon in 2020. An orbiter to Mars in 2014 is also among the ISRO's initiatives during the 11th five-year plan."

Rs 50 crore is more than the budget currently dedicated by ESA to Crew Space Transportation System and however this one has his own article. Hektor 05:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


In response to your post on my talk page, I am opposing the merger as I think it does warrant a seperate article - afterall, we have an article on Tier Two. This is just as speculative, if not more so. We have plenty of cites for the article, so I am happy to leave it be. Hope this helps. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 19:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. We'll see what happens. Hektor 12:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 21:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chicago 2016 Olympic bid CHICOTW

Flag of Chicago
Chicago Collaboration of the Week
 Flag of Chicago
In the past you have edited Chicago 2016 Olympic bid. This week it has been selected as the WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week. Each week a Chicago related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list. See past CHICOTWs. Note our good articles.
Flag of Chicago
Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago
 Flag of Chicago

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 17:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Already preparing for election day?

At first I missed the HTML comments and I was wondering if someone was very confident on Sarkozy's Election ;). I assume you're preparing the same for Royal? -- lucasbfr talk 15:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

  • That was the idea.
Please do not comment inside articles, use the talk page. -- lucasbfr talk 17:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merging proposal

Hi, I saw you are a contributor to the Force de frappe article. I proposed that the France and weapons of mass destruction article could be merged into this article, if you could tell us your point of view on that matter that could be really appreciated. -- Esurnir 15:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Big deal on madonna street.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Big deal on madonna street.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Autumn sonata dvd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Autumn sonata dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Affiche annonce sortie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Affiche annonce sortie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:365 box 348x490.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:365 box 348x490.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Presidents of the French Republic

Hello Hektor, I've reversed your edits at that article. De Gaulle succeeded Coty as President in January 1959 & Chirac remains President (ie. 1995-present) until he leaves office (May 16, 2007). When Chirac actually leaves office, then edit in 1995-2007. Just lettin' ya know. GoodDay 21:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sochi2014.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sochi2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Toutes les simca.jpg

Hello, Hektor. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Toutes les simca.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Hektor/Archive 2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 10:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:E o crime dvd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:E o crime dvd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rachita Dati

Hello, I had heard of Félix Eboué and Gaston Monnerville, I did a check on the French wikipedia, to be sure, but it doesn't say either of them had a key ministerial position. I'll change it back to saying she is the first from an ethnic minority, and a reference to the article on BBC news supporting this. Please let me know if I'm mistaken. I just thought it was an interesting fact, I was only trying to improve. If you disagree still, please don't block me, just change the article back and I will leave it alone, I didn't mean to upset anyone. Thanks. Jackaranga 16:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chicago 2016.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksi_great (talk) 12:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use images

Please read the documentation for fair use images. You'll notice that fair use rationals need to be provided and that one of the necessary facts is that Free alternatives cannot be found. Rama 15:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry, I just cut and paste the text of the Pompidou image ? I thought that since it was ok for Pompidou it was ok for this one. Hektor 16:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
What on Earth is the connection between the photo of Pompidou and this one ? It's not the same photographer, not the same time, and we do not have Free images of Pompidou at the moment. Rama 22:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
We actually had Free material on Pompidou, and the matter has been acted upon in the same way. Rama 22:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Silvia Monti

A tag has been placed on Silvia Monti, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall talk 21:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

  • I think you should leave time to people to write articles.Hektor 21:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Speedy tag removed. Sorry to trouble you. --Finngall talk 21:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry, maybe I should write more before saving. Thanks anyway.Hektor 21:35, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Peugeot 107.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Peugeot 107.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Almaty2014.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Almaty2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Aphrodite DVD.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aphrodite DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Andrei tarkovsky dvd.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrei tarkovsky dvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Aston martin rapide.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aston martin rapide.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Aslan.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aslan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Bangkok2007.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bangkok2007.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Belgrade 2009.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Belgrade 2009.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Borjomi 2014.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Borjomi 2014.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Brown-Cow-Logo 250W.gif

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Brown-Cow-Logo 250W.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Camille Gottlieb

Please do not restart this article. It's not sourced and it attaches a "biography" consisting of an allegation of illegitimacy to a nine-year-old child. FCYTravis 08:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

  • That is your opinion. I thought that deletion was on the basis of notability and not of content. If you want to have it deleted, please organise an Afd. Personnally I think if their are articles about the hundred various kinds of Pokemons, there can be an article about one of the main members of a European Princely family. Regards.Hektor 08:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
    Speculation on the parentage of a child is a clear violation of WP:BLP. FCYTravis 08:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Absolutely not since it can be sourced. The birth of the child is sourced on the Palace web site. Here. The palace web site provides the last name Gottlieb although the princess has never been married to this man afaik. I am sure that I can find reliable sources about the fact that she is born out of wedlock. I have the strong impression the way you deleted this article is irregular. Please reestablish it and put an Afd. This way we can have a real discussion. Hektor 08:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Whether or not it can be sourced is irrelevant. If there is nothing more to say about someone than that they might have been born out of wedlock, that's not a biography, that's a tabloid entry. FCYTravis 08:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
        • Now it does not matter ? Please reconsider. I am not asking to recreate unconditionnally the article, I am asking for an Afd. I think this is a really reasonable request. I just want a discussion, not a deletion like that, on a whim. Hektor 08:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
          • Please, think about this for a moment. Why do you need a separate article on a nine-year-old girl just to repeat to the whole world that she might be born out of wedlock in some celebrity scandal? Do you have a shred of human decency in you to think about the fact that Camille did not choose to become part of a tossed-up family? What else can be written about her? Nothing? Then there's no biography to write, is there? If you insist, I'll undelete and AfD, but do you really think you can write a biography of her that contains more than "she might be out of wedlock and she's been the subject of tabloid speculation?" FCYTravis 08:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Camille Gottlieb is now a redirect to Princess Stephanie. It's not protected, so if you ever think you can write more than "some tabloids said X," you're free to do so. FCYTravis 09:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Dacia logan steppe.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dacia logan steppe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:For all mankind dvd.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:For all mankind dvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Halla univ.gif

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Halla univ.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Joy dvd.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Joy dvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Metro3.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Metro3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Kicking and screaming DVD 349.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kicking and screaming DVD 349.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Saratlas.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Saratlas.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Have mercy of us all.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Have mercy of us all.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Monica car.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Monica car.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Miura 2006.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Miura 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:The Colorado Kid.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Colorado Kid.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:The Big Bus.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The Big Bus.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Lgo lloyd.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lgo lloyd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Seduced abandoned 350 dvd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Seduced abandoned 350 dvd.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Somaly mam.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Somaly mam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Orlyval.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Orlyval.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:LogoUniversiadetorino.gif

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LogoUniversiadetorino.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pixar's UP

Thank you for your Pixar edits regarding UP. Unfortunately, we've been waiting for a 3rd party source (preferably Disney/Pixar themselves) to confirm this information before we include it in a factual encyclopedia article here in WP. Currently, the only reference to it is one sentence on ComingSoon, and a crapload of blog posts all referencing that sentence. Please see WP:CITE for what consitutes a proper citation for Wikipedia (blogs and self-published websites that do not provide their sources do not qualify), and remember that WP:NOT a crystal ball or a fan site -- we may know that something is going to happen based on rumors or conversations we have with Disney/Pixar staff, but until we have outside confirmation on this from reliable sources that can be cross-referenced and documented, we need to remove that information from Wikipedia. We appreciate your cooperation. SpikeJones 21:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

  • It's in Time anyway. Hektor 14:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Did you know?

Updated DYK query On 17 June 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article EADS Astrium Space Tourism Project, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 14:31, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Yi_yi-dvd.jpg

I have tagged Image:Yi_yi-dvd.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:YOUNG_MR_LINCOLN.jpg

I have tagged Image:YOUNG_MR_LINCOLN.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Monica Sweetheart

Any clue what happened to the history for this article? (I only see 2 entries...) Valrith 21:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Astrium space tourism.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Astrium space tourism.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:111_box_348x490.jpg

I have tagged Image:111_box_348x490.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:305_boudu.jpg

I have tagged Image:305_boudu.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:307_naked.jpg

I have tagged Image:307_naked.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:314_pickpocket.jpg

I have tagged Image:314_pickpocket.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:325_kind_hearts_coronets.jpg

I have tagged Image:325_kind_hearts_coronets.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:360_box_348x490.jpg

I have tagged Image:360_box_348x490.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:366_box_348x490.jpg

I have tagged Image:366_box_348x490.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:367_box_348x490.jpg

I have tagged Image:367_box_348x490.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:368_box_348x490.jpg

I have tagged Image:368_box_348x490.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:6_fields_shorts_dvd.jpg

I have tagged Image:6_fields_shorts_dvd.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ugetsu_DVDcover.jpg

I have tagged Image:Ugetsu_DVDcover.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 22:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blue Space

Hi. I see you created the article on Blue Space. I was wondering if you could perhaps add some references to the article and perhaps be able to trace any sourced criticism to help expand the article. Anyway, appreciate any help or thoughts you might have. Steve block Talk 22:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Cheers. Steve block Talk 10:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)