User talk:Heidi.han
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Capacity Development
A tag has been placed on Capacity Development requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dethme0w (talk) 03:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:SatyrTN. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 07:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD
You simply do not remove an AfD tag from an article. You are however most welcome to argue for the article's retention in the AfD discussion. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
{{hangon}} should not be placed on talk pages. Please remove it and place it on the content page.
[edit] Capacity Development
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Capacity Development, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Capacity Development. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Capacity Development, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
