Talk:Heather Mizeur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: Got a lot of useful information on here, but it needs to have independent verification with citations and referencess. Needs tidying up too, as I don't see how her being a lesbian and how many pets she has is relevant to her notability. Maybe I'm being a little hard, but I just wonder who would be interested to know the names of her cats. I'd be more interested in her voting record, and what issues she's made a priority. Edofedinburgh 00:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC) (edit) WikiProject LGBT studies     (Rated Start-Class) LGBT Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. WikiProject Maryland (Rated start-Class) Heather Mizeur is part of WikiProject Maryland, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Maryland. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article has an assessment summary page.

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 00:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Legislative notes section

Obviously any discussion of this type is by necessity selective but the two votes currently listed - both in their selection and their description - smack of partisanship. The language used is the stuff of negative campaign ads, not of encyclopedia articles. -- Lincolnite (talk) 17:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

• Since no objection has been raised to my assessment, I will go ahead and remove the offending paragraph. -- Lincolnite (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)