Talk:Heart Mountain War Relocation Center
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Restoration
The article states that the camp is being restored, as per a 2006 law. Restored as what? A national monument? A national park? Use for private land? This should be made more obvious, both for accuracy & information, and also because it's not made explicit, as it stands now, that the camp isn't being restored to be used once again as a political prison. LordAmeth 20:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] edit of Heart Mountain Relocation Center
I am editing based on the National Historic Landmark Nomination Form. This form is peer reviewed and considered by most folks to be reliable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N michler (talk • contribs) 02:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- Regardless, it cannot be copied verbatim - it must be re-worded to comply with the GFDL. Also, please make sure that you retain wiki-links where appropriate - your last edit removed a number of them (I have restored them). Thanks. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 03:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks CP
for the guidance, removing some excess verbiage, and restoring the wiki-links. I am digesting the material and not copying verbatim. N michler (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] This article is frightningly misguided
He talks about this like it was a luxury resort, not a forced internet camp where American citizens were strippe of their rights and then forced to serve in the military for their former fellow citizens, now their oppressers. This article is both well written and extremely offensive. I have no knowledge of the topic, so I can not revise it, but PLEASE! Someone fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.6.208 (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have fairly extensive knowledge of the internment experience. The article is very much incomplete, but how is it offensive? And if you have no knowledge of the topic, why are you offended by it? That makes no sense at all. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)