Talk:Health Care (The Office episode)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Dunder Mifflin
I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 23:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TheOffice(US)1-03.jpg
Image:TheOffice(US)1-03.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Good article review
Unfortunately, I am failing this article under the criteria. While it is generally well written, factually accurate, verifiable, neutral, stable and illustrated, it is not broad in its coverage. The lead should summarize the article and briefly mention what went on behind the scenes and how critics reacted to the episode, but this article simply does not have enough information to summarize. The production section can be expanded with Fischer's blog. It states when the episode was filmed, which parts were improvised and that is was the last to be produced for the season. The reception section does not feature a single review of the episode. I'll bet that someone at Rotten Tomatoes mentioned "Health Care" in their first season DVD review. I don't have a problem citing [1] for ratings information as it serves as an archive of NBC press releases. The references are inconsistent (not a problem for GA). Some have authors, some have periods and some have dates. –thedemonhog talk • edits 01:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)