Talk:Hawaiian sovereignty movement/Temp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Hawaiian sovereignty movement refers to the groups and organizations seeking to regain the sovereignty of the Hawaiian people that was lost when the Kingdom of Hawaii was overthrown in 1893. Sovereignty in this context, refers to the power of Native Hawaiians to exercise their inherent rights typically expressed through independent self-government.[1]

According to Jon M. Van Dyke of the William S. Richardson School of Law, in a joint resolution passed in 1993, the United States Congress apologized to the Native Hawaiians for the 1893 overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom and the annexing of Hawaii in 1898. In resolution S.J.Res.19, which became United States Public Law No 103-150, the Congress of the U.S. called for a "reconciliation" between the U.S. and Native Hawaiians, admitting that U.S. support for the 1893 overthrow was "illegal" and a violation of "international law". Van Dyke describes the reconciliation process as ongoing, and says that it will necessitate the restoration of the sovereignty of Native Hawaiians and the return of land and resources.[2]

Contents

[edit] History

[edit] Kingdom of Hawaii

See also: Kingdom of Hawaii

[edit] Overthrow

[edit] Annexation

[edit] Statehood

[edit] Reconciliation and reparations

[edit] ALOHA Association

[edit] Native Hawaiians Study Commission

[edit] Office of Native Hawaiian Relations

[edit] Act 354

[edit] Apology Resolution

Main article: Apology Resolution
Wikisource has original text related to this article:

[edit] Akaka Bill

Main article: Akaka Bill

[edit] Office of Hawaiian Affairs

[edit] Initiatives

[edit] Movements

  • Na 'Ohana o Hawai'i
  • Hou Hawaiians
  • State Council of Hawaiian homesteaders
  • Ka Pakaukau
  • Pro-Hawaiian Sovereignty Working Group
  • Native Hawaiian Rights Conference

[edit] Draft Blueprint for Native Hawaiian Entitlements

[edit] Ka Lahui Hawaii

Ka Lahui Hawai'i was organized in 1987 and claims a membership of 20,000. The group believes that the nation within a nation model is the best way for "indigenous Hawaiians to negotiate with the US and enforce their rights".

[edit] Institute for the Advancement of Hawaiian Affairs

[edit] Hawaiian sovereignty advisory council

[edit] Hawaiian sovereignty elections commission

[edit] Features

  • Land base: control and ownership of resources
  • Right to determine citizenship
  • Right to self-government

[edit] Models

[edit] Independent nation

See also: Independence

Return to pre-1893 independence. Hawaii would no longer be part of the U.S. and its people would be citizens of the nation of Hawaii, not U.S. Re-establishment of monarchy, like Tonga for example, is a possibility under this model. Other alternatives include part monarchy and representative government like Great Britain, or a U.S.-style representative democracy. Advantages: right to create treaties, determine citizenship, control immigration, issue passports, stamps, currency, army, management of land and resources, tax collection, courts, schools, police. Disadvantages: seceding from the U.S. would be difficult; economic and military insecurity due to isolated geographical location.[1]

Poka Laenui (Hayden Burgess) is a proponent of this model.

[edit] Free association

See also: Associated state

[edit] Nation within a nation

Ka Lahui Hawaii supports this model.

[edit] State within a state

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ a b Menton & Tamura 1999, pp. 377-383.
  2. ^ Van Dyke 2006, pp.215-239.

[edit] References

[edit] Primary sources

[edit] Secondary sources

[edit] Further reading