User talk:Haudcivitas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Speedy deletion of Wragan 2 Disappearance of Madeleine McCann 3 3RR guidance 4 Witiquette

[edit] Speedy deletion of Wragan

A tag has been placed on Wragan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Siva1979^{Talk to me} 03:26, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

Thank you for your contribution to this page. However, the request for a reconstruction is already in the article here. The statement "They also stated they would not return to Portugal whilst still the offical suspects" is not what the source says. The reported feelings of the McCanns, by an un-named friend, is not sufficiently reliable to be encyclopaedic. I am undecided about the relevance of the trip to Brussels and have therefore moved it to talk for views. Please add your comments there. Thank you. TerriersFan (talk) 00:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay it's been said many times that the Mccanns will not return as official suspects, in fact for months. Link it if you have a problem with my source, rather than removing it when you know damn well it is the reality of things. Also a trip to Brussels to meet MEPs one day after the Portugese police request they come back? Get beat with your edit, it was lame and you know it. Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haudcivitas (talk • contribs) 01:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

First of all, the request to return is already in the article. Next, the sources say "But he made it clear the couple were still undecided on whether to return to the resort." so your addition is inaccurate. The McCanns feelings are not reliably sourced - being attributed to an unnamed friend - "A friend of the couple said: "Kate is upset. There's been no sense of concern for her feelings or the anguish it will cause her.". The Brussels trip is for discussion - I agree there are arguments both ways. TerriersFan (talk) 01:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR guidance

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Disappearance of Madeleine McCann. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. TerriersFan (talk) 21:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Witiquette

I noticed a few heated words being exchanged between yourself and other users, particularly around the Madeleine McCann article. Just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia is not a forum for your opinion on other editors; you should always assume good faith and act with civility to fellow editors :) AL_LOCKE|^talk 00:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making accusations and personal comments in edit summaries and on talk pages. Discuss the article, not the editors. Making personal attacks will result in you being blocked. HtD (talk) 19:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your edit summary here refers. TerriersFan (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)