User:Haus/3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Comments from FAC review
- Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Bulk_carrier/archive1
- General concern raised: too many citations, needs a thorough copy-edit, and "subprofessional formatting."
- "This is partly due to new regulations coming into effect which put greater constraints on the building of larger vessels" - can you elaborate (a sentence or two) on these regulations
- "Bulkers", as a nickname, should be in quotes on its first appearance.
- The paragraph "Once the ship has discharged its cargo, the crew begins..." should be joined with the previous
[edit] Automated PR
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.[?]
- This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, then an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
- Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: meter (A) (British: metre), recognize (A) (British: recognise), categorize (A) (British: categorise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), analyse (B) (American: analyze), traveled (A) (British: travelled).
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, HausTalk 12:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)