Talk:Hatchet (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Brian Returns
- This seems to be fixed now. --Norwaystudent 09:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I see the "Spoilers end here," but where do the spoilers start? Cloudbreath9 22:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cover
The caption under the cover says, "First edition cover". But the cover says on it, "Over 2 million copies sold" - indicating that it's not the first edition! 142.150.138.101 04:19, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Error
It says his name is Exercist instead of Robeson. I'm new to Wiki, so I don't know how to fix it.Deathlyhallows426 22:47, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh, never mind. I fixed it.70.119.230.93 05:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC) HATCHET IS A GAY BOOK THAT REPEATS ITSELF AND HAS SENTENCES THAT HAVE LIKE 2 WORDS IN IT! WHAT SORT OF BOOK IS THAT, ILL TELL YOU, A GAY ONE! fhgdrfvhryRf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.221.124 (talk) 02:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hatchet.jpg
Image:Hatchet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I DONT LIKE THIS BOOK
WELL I DO, BUT I ENDS REALLY BAD, AND IT HAS A LOT OF SHORT SENTENCES AND GARY PAULSEN REPEATS HIMSELF A LOT IN ALL HIS BOOKS, ITS REALY ANNOYING! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.151.66 (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)