Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club/Members

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following Wikipedians are volunteer members of the Harmonious Editing Club. If you would like to join, add your name to the list after agreeing to this (short) list of guidelines:

Always aim to end edit wars by helping editors reach a compromise.
Never revert more than once — always take it to the talk page.
Avoid triggering edit wars — discuss major and/or controversial changes on the talk page beforehand.
Request input from the wider community when necessary (e.g., at Peer review, Requests for comment, Requests for page protection, Village pump, etc.)
Politely remind others not to make abusive remarks, keeping wikiquette and civility in mind at all times.
Refactor talk pages when they get too long or tangled.
Be bold (not reckless) in editing

You are free to remove your name from the list at any time.

[edit] Current members

Jake

[edit] Members

In order to flaunt your membership and to promote our project Fig has created a userbox to be placed on your userpage:

This user is proud to be a member of the Harmonious Editing Club.

= {{HEC userbox}}

Supeyman
A D Monroe III ^talk Really, it's the only way to be constructive.
Addesso Wow, talking as a form of constructively and peacefully solving disputes. That is so . . . out-of-the-box, radical thinking! I'm in!
Alarob (Rob C)
Alex756 (glad to see there are voluntary associations forming on Wikipedia)
Algotr
Alx-pl D
Alex Plank
— Ambush Commander^(Talk)
Aminullah
Anchoress per DeathPhoenix :-))
Andrewa
[[User:Consequencefree|Ardent^†_∈]] =D Diplomats unite! Harmony can thrive with a few dedicated people. Make the Wiki a better place!
Arminius - happy to help with disputes
Asbestos - Talk pages should always be used after a revert (except in the case of vandalism or trolls, of course)
Ashibaka talk
AvB
Ben Aveling
Benc
Beth Wellington 23:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC) Sounds good to me.
Bogdan
Buddhipriya 03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Catwhoorg
Chairman S. ^Talk
Chancemill
Chazz88
Chriswaterguy Good principles. Happy to lend a hand if needed.
cjllw | TALK
Clockwork Soul
Comatose51
Comaze
Coppertwig Anyway, I try to stick to 1RR, and I believe in, you know, harmony and all that.
CP/M
Daduzi
Dan100
David Spalding ^Talk/_Contribs Bringing Order to chaos can also mean bringing Collaboration to clashing and Consensus to contention
David Strauss
∞wirelain - We have cousins over at WP:CCD.
Death phoenix - I've been doing this anyway, so why not sign up?
Deebkie ^talk
dewet|✉
Drenched Harmony rocks. Editing rocks too. Harmonious editing rocks especially hard.
Driken
Durova 18:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Denni
— Dzonatas
User:Ed Poor - on probation for "tendentious editing" (oh, the shame, the shame!)
Encephalon | ^ζ This is good.
Ethnopunk Do we really have to lose our edits to morons?
User:Euyyn - per Deathphoenix
Falphin
Fishal
Flammifer - I'm certainly interested in tackling and improving divisive issues !
Flora_b_1
Evrenosogullari
Fredrik - the description above seems to apply to me
Friday - Sounds good to me.
Glenn Willen
··gracefool |☺ - this club needs to grow!
Groove1279 - Because Wikipedia is about "WE" not "ME" ;)
Iirolaiho
ike9898
ikkyu2 (talk)
Ilyanep If I start to violate the above rules, please stick my ass in a freezer. :D
Ingoolemo
INic I'm only here 'cause I'm an evil, stinking troll in need of redemption
Jondel 06:44, 15 August 2005 (UTC) - I heard this club is strictly restricted to good looking people only? :)
Juraj Betak
JCarriker
Jehochman 15 August 2006
Jet123
JFW | T@lk
J-V Heiskanen (as long as the above are going to be the final and only bylaws of this club)
Jokermage ^{"Timor Mentum Occidit"}
Joshua — worth a try
≈ jossi ≈ t • @
kaal
kawaputra
Keesiewonder ^talk -- I have trouble w/not reverting what I perceive as vandalism multiple times though ...
kevthegreat55 I'll do my best
Kodama will try to be friendly...
User:KrakatoaKatie - Harmony and me are pretty good company...
Laleena
Lisapollison I also self-designate as a trial member, & aspire to full membership
Lquilter self-designates as a trial member, & aspires to full membership
Ludraman
Manscher
— mark ✎
Marshman (I think I have passed through the early un-harmonious stage relatively unscathed)
— Matt Crypto 10:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Mbbradford -- Don't worry, this is not Esperanza
Meelar
MONGO I need harmonizing...
Neigel von Teighen ready to put some harmony!
— ナイトスタリオン _ㇳ–ㇰ — — I'm in.
Neutrality what Ruhrjung said.
nobs
Ombudsman
Omphaloscope — ready to sing my part
Paleorthid What Saxifrage said.
Paul venter Harmonious editing sounds like an oxymoron, but let's show good faith!
Pedant A lot of articles, I don't even edit, just add to the discussion what seems good or bad about it. I'll help on anything.
Perl
PhilKnight
Pufferfish101
User:damian111
Randy
Ravn, Strong support. ;)
Rdsmith4 - Oh, why not. Is there a Category:Lost causes?
Revived
richard Spread harmonious editing, join the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal!
Rickyrab
royblumy
Ruhrjung has been with you in the heart all the time (the deeds might be another matter)
sasawat
Rursus 100% agreed by prev speaker.
Saxifrage Because the willow survives the storm that fells the oak.
Schmiteye
Seth Mahoney Yay! for harmony!
Shannon
Simon 19:33, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
SlimVirgin I think the decision to self-limit on reverting is a good idea.
Smyth
Sobar I never knew this club existed. I think this is great.
Spalding
Stephen B Streater while noting that agreement does not require compromise
Stevertigo
Strawberry Sara
Subramanian ^talk -- Ahimsa, everyone!
sɪzlæk [ +t, +c ]
Superm401 | Talk
T-dot ( talk ^contribs )
TAS
Tatteredpaper | (^talk)
The Founders Intent Just say, "Ummmmmmmmm...."
The Placebo Effect
The Prophet Wiz ard of the Cray on Cake
TheronJ Good idea
Timbo
Toby Bartels
User:Tony Sidaway
T.PK Ready for some harmonizing!
Trade2tradewell If you want to improve your POV , be ready to listen to the other
Trubadurix Sounds good
Tuf-Kat
Umofomia
utcursch
visctrix
WikiLen — learning how to have 1 revert work
WikiprojectOWU
WikiUser
Wing Nut
Xinit
Xiong Chiamiov
Zappaz. A tall order for a person with my character, but worth striving for!
Ze miguel
Zero
Mac_Davis (talk · contribs) - I always wanted to be a prime number.
Bunty.Gill - newbie@harmonious edits club
--Irmgard 17:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
JiMoThY^TALK
John Pritchard - that's what this is, wikipedia, isn't it? whew.
--Brrk.3001 06:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Im in!
--Sir james paul 12:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Ruthfulbarbarity 03:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Davandron
NinaEliza (talk • contribs • logs) 20:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 11:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Love to give it a shot..
BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC) I shall strive to live up to this in all my future edits. --BenBurch 20:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Pavithran|Talk - Good initiative! Keep it up guys!
Shack_★Talk，I like it. And actually Harmonious editing was the purpose of Wikipedia, who like seeing Wikipedia quarrel endlessly? 08:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
SmokeyJoe "Wikipedia is not here to make people sad. So we want to respond in a helpful and loving way." 21:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
john196920022001 An early experience on Wikipedia involved an edit war with an uncivil editor. Before I knew any better I contributed to that edit war. In researching incivility I found this club
User:Abridged -- I like this idea. Abridged 19:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
User:Jedi feline This sounds like a good idea, especially for music pages where there are genre disputes that could easily be resolved but aren't.
User:Cyrillic Great Idea...let's join our hands knights of Wikipedia!
Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 01:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
What a great club! --Shirahadasha 03:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
nadav (talk) 10:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
In the most sincere manner, -A Sprig of Fig & a lock of holly 17:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 18:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC) [I agree with the current aims and endeavor to follow them (which I think I generally have done in past edits). I was going to join a year back; no idea why I didn't.)
Kotare 07:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC) What a great concept, the guidelines of this club are well thought out and intelliegent and if followed will tremendously reduce the amount of unproductive conflict on wikipedia.
Mooncrest
Shruti14 Great idea!!
Crypter 23:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC) I'm new but this sounds great
Rycr 11:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Bardofcornish 00:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC) sounds like a great way to promote wikilove!!
Meristat 22:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Tr1290 16:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Philbuck222 01:19, 31 October 2007
User:loolylolly1997 5:25, 30 November 2007
Pinkadelica (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
1Bookfan Talk
—Elipongo (Talk contribs) Don't know why I never noticed this club before, I already pretty much follow its guidelines!
TicketMan - Talk - contribs
BradMajors
Jasy jatere
Fuzzform
Shruti14
Luk suh 01:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Apis 20:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Giovanni33 (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC) I want to join too. Actually, I think this clubs stipulations should be made as policy for all.Giovanni33 (talk) 01:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Rafaelsfingers

Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club/Members

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Current members

[edit] Members

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search