User talk:Harry weasley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May I ask why you deleted the scorecard from the Frat Pack page?Kevin Crossman 16:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

because some of the films were incorrect accourding to the frat pack tribute site (of which you are a senior editor)

Well, two wrongs don't make a right. :-) Fixing the info would have been better... (IMHO).Kevin Crossman 22:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

i tried but the chart kept messing up when i changed some of the listed films (i have since found out that each bar is for a different frat packer and have made the appropriate changes)

Contents

[edit] WP:NPA

Please be civil and avoid making personal attacks against other editors. We're all in this together, and W.marsh works really hard to improve Wikipedia. Thanks. -- But|seriously|folks  17:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica's apartment

Hello! If you have a business case for the ressurection of this deleted article then please take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review and make it there. Please do not simply recreate it as this is in violation of community consensus. Regards, (aeropagitica) 18:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I really do urge you to follow the correct procedure when it comes to reintroducing material to the project. To deliberately ignore advice offered to you in good faith makes you appear as a vandal and will mean that your continued actions will result in a ban on editing. Regards, (aeropagitica) 18:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. (aeropagitica) 18:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to User:(aeropagitica). It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Sandahl 18:07, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sandahl 18:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] blocked

I have blocked this user for "belligerently recreating article and making personal attacks".--W.marsh 18:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "your reason here"

Decline reason: "No. Sean William @ 18:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

i think that my block is unfair because all i am doing is adding information that was deleated for no reason.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "please unblock me i want to improve the article without just copying and pasting the deleated one."

Decline reason: "declined - come back in a couple days and tell us what you did wrong, how you will behave differently, and how you will improve the encyclopedia. — After Midnight 0001 18:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


A tag has been placed on Friends settings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

cut and paste of a deleted article - violates the GFDL

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deranged bulbasaur 09:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Little context in Natalie Denning

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Natalie Denning, by Drivenapart (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Natalie Denning is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Natalie Denning, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Star Trek (film)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Alientraveller 13:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Alientraveller 13:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
So now you want ahead and vandalized my talk page. Good day to your sir! Alientraveller 13:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

For your general vandalism and harassment around here, and for this edit in particular, you are now blocked from editing indefinitely. ➔ This is REDVEЯS 13:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] retired

i have decided to retire from wikipedia because i have been accused of sockpuppetry which is untrue.

[edit] Returning

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "please may i be unblocked from wikipedia i was blocked on 8th july 2007 and in the six months since i was blocked i have read the policies and guidlines (and the five pillars) and i have realised that it is the community that makes wikipedia so great and not the indervidual. i am sorry for the vandalism and personal attacks that i have made (i was so sure that what i was editing was right that i did not think about other peoples views or opinions and for that i am sorry). another thing that i am sorry about is being a sockpuppeteer (and denying being one) the reason i did this was because i thought that if i had two accounts with the same views what i was aying would not be edited. i now know that this was wrong and i should have used the user descussion to talk about any editing differences that had occured. i have also realised by observation that certain pages (such as trivia) need to be deleated because they do not cite sources and because they are often articles that have been spun off from a main article but do add any new information of importance. so please can i be unblocked because i have taken time to reflect on what i have done and i want to be an active member of this community again."

Decline reason: "See below. Please realize that if your future request is successful, you will be reblocked immediately if there is any sign of sockpuppetry or harassment. - auburnpilot talk 20:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
  • Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
  • When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. - auburnpilot talk 20:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)