User talk:Harrism84

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Harrism84 User Talk

[edit] Candy Manson

A tag has been placed on Candy Manson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Candy Manson is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Candy Manson saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Epbr123 18:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Block

Per your edit history, including recent comments identifying public figures as "gay" and enjoying anal sex, it appears you do not wish to contribute positively. Your account has been blocked indefinitely. Deiz talk 23:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblocking

You were blocked for your conduct, not for your username. Changing username is therefore inappropriate. If you feel that your conduct did not merit a block, or you wish to assert future good behavior, please complete an appropriate unblock request. Deiz talk 03:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock Request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I wasn't serious when I made those comments, and I assure you that in the future I won't ever make bad comments, only actual edits."

Decline reason: "Please give a specific and exact non-trivial edit that you plan on making, then re-request an unblock. — Yamla 17:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

unblock|I created a page for my alumni high school pearl river hs, and continue to add to it through research. i also created a candy devine's page, and am working with her to expand.

I asked for a specific and exact non-trivial edit that you plan on making. An alumni high school page would most certainly be inappropriate on the Wikipedia. And if you are working with Candy Devine, you are in a conflict of interest and so should not edit that page. --Yamla 20:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

unblock|I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say i was making an alumni page for pearl river high school, I said I was an alumni and made a page for pearl river high school because other schools in rockland county had them but not PR. Also with the candy manson, I was told by another user that checks up I need permission to use a photo, and that's what I meant with candy manson. Again, I didn't mean any harm and won't do it again.

[edit] Explanation?

I'd like to see this diff explained before any further discourse about unblocking. Wikipedia is not a message board or clubhouse to screw around with your school friends. Deiz talk 04:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC

unblock|The only way I can explain that is that I was showing my friend how to put those userbars in and i told him certain stuff was there and certain wasn't. I said one for being 'straight' wasn't there, but gay was. It was removed after. Basically, I don't know what I can say to change your mind except that if you let me back on, I will never make slanderous remarks, and if I do, you may ban me with out a chance of being unblocked.

[edit] Update?

{{unblock|any update on my status?}}

[edit] Anything?

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was wondering what my current ban status is. Diez has stopped 'returing my call' per say and I've apologized numerious times. I realize what I did was stupid, but I belive in second chances. If unblocked, I'd promise to make positive contributions."

Decline reason: "Prove it. Write a complete new article to the standards of WP:TPA in a separate section below. Then request unblock again. — Sandstein 21:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Article on What?

{{unblock reviewed|what should the article be on?}}

Anything you like, provided it fits Wikipedia's inclusion criteria and is attributed to reliable sources. It has to be your own work, of course - no copyright violations. Sandstein 05:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Article

{{unblock reviewed|would my Pearl River High School article page count?}}

Don't post using "unblock reviewed" tags. Just write here normally. I have your talk page watchlisted. And no, you must write a new article. This is what we are here for, you know, writing articles. Sandstein 06:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question?

I have some info for a new page, but if I can't edit, where do I put it?

Stop using unblock templates for regular communication with others. Rest assured your page is being monitored. User:Harrism84/New article. Try editing that page. Deiz talk 02:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
If Sandstein agrees then I'll unblock you. Of course, we'd be talking best behaviour... Deiz talk 03:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No Luck

I can't edit that page either. If I return to the Wiki Community, I promise to be on my best behavior.

You have been unblocked. Please get in touch if you have any questions about contributing... Deiz talk 17:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
It is not good practice to simply delete conversations from your talkpage, other than to remove attacks or abuse.. once the page becomes sufficiently long (usually 20+ conversations) you can archive it, and leave a link to the archive. This is not mandatory, and if you delete again I won't restore it, but it will be another indication of how willing you are to follow standard practices. Deiz talk 02:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unaware

I'm sorry, I was unaware that I wasn't allowed to edit my talk page.

[edit] Speedy Delete of an article you created

A tag has been placed on Danielle Derek, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Danielle Derek is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Danielle Derek saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Fritzpoll 17:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Brandy at avn fixed.jpg

Hi Harris, could you fill in some details about your uploading of this photo under a free licence? Did you take the picture yourself? It appears to be a publicity shot, and google shows it is used on a myspace profile. Thanks, Deiz talk 14:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Any progress on the image copyright licence verification? I've removed it from the article, if you do manage to provide evidence of release to WP:OTRS, please upload a new image with no pink border. Cheers, Deiz talk 10:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Brandy_at_avn_fixed.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brandy_at_avn_fixed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Brandy at avn fixed.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandy at avn fixed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)