User:Harryema

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Harryema.

• German Idealism and almost all the articles related to it need to be either rewritten or expanded, because a wikipedia user called Lestrade has, among other things, taken it upon himself to imbue each page with bias in favour of Schopenhauer, who he attempts to present as having the last say in everything. This is a terrible thing to do, because German Idealism is such an important period in philosophy, whose influence is still strongly felt today.
• Protected Values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
• Ludwig Wittgenstein is having its FA status reviewed due to a couple of concerns. Help save Ludwig! See Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ludwig Wittgenstein for requirements for retaining FA status.
• Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
• Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
• Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
• Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
• Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
• Star of Sophia Vote for or nominate someone you think is deserving!
• Analytic_philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
• Inverse (logic) This article makes me wish that there were a fail grade on the quality scale. Someone should rewrite it.

Articles needing attention • Article logistics • Article & other content reviews • Special projects • Stress hotline • Writing contests

• A trial collaboration for peer reviews has begun between the Military history Project and the Video Game project with the aim of improving the review process by getting cross project input on articles. It will run until June 30, at which point an evalutation of the program will take place to determine its fate.
• A discussion has been started on how to restructure Category:World War II. All input welcome!
• The special projects department has opened. It will focus on specific ad-hoc high-priority tasks and implement them with informal, short-term groups of editors.
• The May newsletter is now available!
• Tag & Assess 2008 has been launched. All editors are very welcome as we've got 60,000 articles to work through. As usual, barnstars galore, plus a friendly competition for the coveted bronze, silver and gold wikis. See here.

Featured article candidates 

Battle of Lissa (1811) • Lince (tank) • Cold War • Battle of Verrières Ridge • Brian Horrocks

Featured article review 

Isaac Brock • Structural history of the Roman military • War of the Spanish Succession • Theodore Roosevelt • AK-47

Other featured content candidates 

Portal:World War II • Australian Red Cross poster, WWI • Vietnam Tunnel Rat • Tank schematic diagram • H.M.S. Pinafore

A-Class review [Attention needed!] 

Greco-Persian Wars • Nguyen Van Nhung

Good article candidates 

Full list...

Peer review 

USS Wisconsin (BB-64) • Uriel Sebree • Tank • Roman-Persian Wars • Operation Brevity • USS Lenape (ID-2700) • USS Princess Matoika (ID-2290) • USS Finland (ID-4543) • USS Mercy (AH-4)

Articles needing attention 

...to referencing and citation (11,859) • ...to coverage and accuracy (5,172) • ...to structure (3,050) • ...to grammar (717) • ...to supporting materials (3,230) • ...to tagging (4)