Talk:Harry Jenkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Portal	Harry Jenkins is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Using youtube vids as refs is questionable...

Timeshift (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Especially since the Kevin Rudd and the list of Speakers on the Speaker of the House page shows says not true. Duggy 1138 (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comment.

I wasn't trying to be pedantic, I just couldn't see the point of the additional link. I know you were trying to make a point by getting rid of the extra link, but, hey, I like it. I makes sense to me to have gotten rid of it. Thanks, I hadn't noticed it was there. Duggy 1138 (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

And I didn't notice the first two were there, shows how much we really look at articles. Timeshift (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I was sure the first one was, so I checked again. I actually saw the second one while checking but it didn't register that it was the same thing, so yeah, it goes to show how much we really look at articles. Duggy 1138 (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)