Talk:Harold Warner

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

The Links added show the book in full context. Why does the book need to be online to be valid? Many refs in wiki are books that are off line. Also this artile about Warner is on par with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Pringle or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Lee_Clary or anyone like that. The facts are there. Instead of deleting it it shoud just be built on. Sapienz 04:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Warner has sent out 100's of churches, more than Phil Pringle! Sapienz 05:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

This guy is less notible http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong_Hee Sapienz 05:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Only source references are in violation of copyright laws

As explained before, there is not enough other sources to valid this article. What you have put is a Secondary source from a Copyrightedbook scanned into a web site that violates that copyright. There still is no original Primary source to crossreference this article from. There is no original reseach and so the article depending on one source can be a possible forgery. I'll get back to this article later.Darrenss 12:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Waymanmitchell.com

This link has alread been discussed. Plz read talk page on: The Potter's House regarding this link.Darrenss 00:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)