Talk:Hard dance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This genre is completely fictitious. I suggest it be removed from Wikipedia. --63.100.44.98 16:53, March 23 2006
- nonsense. here's just a few references; [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] --MilkMiruku 17:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Hard dance is like a new grouping for stuff that wasn't as hardcore sounding. It's more to do with the "club" scene than the old "rave" scene. More BBC Radio 1 stuff. It's things like UK Hard House and Hard Trance. Some of the new hardcore stuff could become blurred though.
-
- I notice on the front page that Happy Hardcore is on here. It's use on Wiki needs to be discontinued. The term is outdated - there is no such style. It's being used greatly out of context. --Revolt 18:29, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Nu Style Gabba
Shouldn't nu style hardcore/gabba also belong to the hard dance group? It can be often heard on harddance events (typical dutch scheme - starting with hardtrance, going hardstyle, ending hardcore).
[edit] Importance of Hard Dance
I saw hard dance was included as one of the main electronic music genres: Ambient, Breakbeat, Drum and bass, Electronica, Electronic art music, Hard dance, Hardcore, House, Techno, Trance, Industrial, Synthpop. I think hard dance is mainly a slower spin-off of Hardcore dance music and not one of the main electronic music genres. Read the article Gabber music on Nuskool gabba / Nu style gabber. Brz7 12:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hard Dance Major Genre
In the UK at least, hard dance is major Genre of dance music, and should definatly belong where it is. Examples of huge hard dance labels include tidy, and on trackitdown.net a huge online record shop the genre is next list only to trance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.70.21 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 15 December 2006
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Matt Ricks - Home Again.ogg
Image:Matt Ricks - Home Again.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)