Talk:Haptic communication
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. |
| B | This page has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance assessment scale |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. Please visit the project page for more details, or ask questions on talk. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
[edit] X percents of what did what?
Remland and Jones (1995) studied groups of people communicating and found that in England (8%), France (5%) and the Netherlands (4%) touching was rare compared to their Italian (14%) and Greek (12.5%) sample.
What does these numbers refer to? They're pretty nonsensical without a definition. --85.231.180.45 (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] This page is a mess
This page is a mess with two/three areas vying for the word haptic(s) The area may be better described in three sections
- Haptic_communications alternatively Haptic_behaviour
To contain most of what is currently on this page (Haptics)
- Haptic_perception (ie the use of haptics in the psychology of perception)
Possibly the introductory page since Gibson (1965) and Titchner (1895) Amer. Jrnl. Psychol. VIII. 82 were both using the word well before the usage currently outlined on these pages.
- Haptic_technology
currently filed under the page Haptic —Preceding unsigned comment added by W.Harwin (talk • contribs) 19:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
