Talk:Hanukkah bush

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Holiday-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of objectives or join the project.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Votes for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on September 5, 2005. The result of the vote was keep. An archived record of this vote can be found here.


This is an interesting subject, but I think it would serve better if condensed slighly and merged with Christmas tree.

Peter Isotalo 16:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Moving tangential stuff here for the moment

I guess I've changed my mind... so I'm moving this material here for the moment because I think it's good stuff that belongs somewhere, but it's a little tangential to Hanukkah bushes, and the phenomenon of "mutual goodwill between Jews and Christians during the holiday season" is not really the same thing as "Hanukkah becoming more and more like Christmas."

In the U.S., in the twentieth century, Hanukkah began to be perceived as having similarities to Christmas. A 1926 reference quotes a speaker at a New York temple, speaking on "Hanukkah and Christmas," as saying that "whenever there is the human demonstration of kindliness, freedom, and good cheer" Jews should "participate, but that all theological interpretations should be ignored."[1] In 1940, Christmas fell on the first day of Hanukkah; in 1946, it fell within the eight-day Hanukkah celebration. Both occasions were marked by expressions of Jewish-Christian unity. A 1946 news item mentions a "joint Christmas-Hanukkah program" at a Minneapolis school and quotes the organizer as saying "now these are widespread throughout the country."[2] Increasingly, Hanukkah began to syncretize the less obviously religious elements of Christmas.

  1. ^  "Finds Jewish Feast Like Christmas." The New York Times, December 6, 1926, p. 26, reporting a talk by Dr. Nathan Kraus at Temple Emanu-El
  2. ^  "Toys to Fit the Child," The New York Times, December 15, 1946, p. SM22, item at end of an article about toy selection

[edit] Article title

This article was recently moved by User:Jordain to Jewish Christmas Tree with the edit comment "Hanukkah bush moved to Jewish Christmas Tree: Name is insufficient, anti-Christian."

The Wikipedia:Naming convention is to "give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize."

"Hanukkah bush" gets 1030 Google hits and is a real phrase that is widely used.

"Jewish Christmas tree" gets only 90 Google hits and from context it is clear that this is not a customary way of referring to it.

I do not see what is either "insufficient" or "anti-Christian" about the name "Hanukkah bush," but in any case that is the real name. "Jewish Christmas tree" is a description.

Discuss here and don't move the article, certainly not until it is off AfD, but also not before there is consensus on what the name of the article should be. Dpbsmith (talk) 22:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Not keeping the article at Hanukkah bush could be seen as anti-Jewish. It's the most widely used phrase. We don't need to try and be religiously "correct" about it. Anti-Christian is not a good reason to move an article on a Jewish subject. - Mgm|(talk) 07:24, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Hanukkah bush is the name that should be used. This has nothing to do with "anti=Christian". --ZappaZ 17:43, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Yeah, and it's not a Jewish Christmas tree, it's a Hannukah bush! :) jengod 18:23, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
  • As a Christian, I don't know what is supposed to be "anti-Christian" about the current name, which doesn't appear to reflect on Jesus or Christianity one way or another. If I had to start at the beginning, I'd call it a "Shrubbery sacrifice for Hanukkah", but sometimes life gets ahead of art. Smerdis of Tlön 18:35, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

I don't have much first-hand experience with the subject of this article, but it does seem that it describes a phenomenon that is distinct enough (though related) to Christmas trees to warrant a distinct article. Also, though I was raised in a Christian family, one of the earliest memories I have from our Christmas tree was a bagel ornament similar to that described as having been at Saks Fifth Avenue. That detail of the article was particularly interesting to me. — ArkansasTraveler 22:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Offensive to Christians?

Please don't insert material suggesting that the practice is offensive to Christians unless you can supply a verifiable source citation to back this up, such as a quotation from a prominent clergyman. Note that Hanukkah bushes are not public displays. Dpbsmith (talk) 11:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bad Page

I find this page insulting. It is not a common practice for Jews to have a Christmas Tree in their homes, and in this page there are no quoted sources to say anything to the contrary to grain of this article.

  • I count six or seven sources... e.g. Rabbi Ron Isaacs, "There are certainly Jewish families that feel that they can have a tree in the house without subscribing to the Christian element of the holiday," Peter W. Williams, "Some Jews eager to approximate Gentile customs... and with tongue firmly in cheek—add a 'Hanukkah bush,' or Christmas-tree substitute, and even have visits from "Uncle Max, the Hanukkah man," a clear counterpart to a well-known Christmas figure." And I don't think Saks Fifth Avenue would have advertised decorations for a "Chanukah bush" if it were a rare or obscure practice. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I think the anon has a point. There are no real sources given on the prevalence of the practice; some rabbi making an anecdotal remark has no particular authority on this. And very many references to "Hannukah bushes" in popular culture are just more or less jokes, including the 1974 Saks ad (if there was a major market, one would think this would be targeted just a little more regularly). I am seriously skeptical that this article may be implicity exxagerating the prevalence of Hanukkah bushes in the U.S. What we desperately need a real source, like a relevant poll or sociological study of Americans Jews.--Pharos 22:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
There are many ridiculous pages in Wikipedia, and this certainly qualifies as one of them.--Gilabrand 11:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree; this is insane. I live in one of the major Jewish areas/cities of America and NO ONE I know has one of these things!! The closest I could find was when a well-meaning Xian bought a little blue tinsel tree for her boss & said she was going to decorate it for him for Chanukah as a gift.FlaviaR 10:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Euphemism?

One definition of euphemism is:

The act or an example of substituting a mild, indirect, or vague term for one considered harsh, blunt, or offensive. "“Euphemisms such as ‘slumber room’ . . . abound in the funeral business” (Jessica Mitford).

Another is:

the substitution of an agreeable or inoffensive expression for one that may offend or suggest something unpleasant; also : the expression so substituted

Euphemisms usually refer to taboo things like religion, excretion, and sex.

I find it hard to view "hanukkah bush" as a "euphemism," because I think few Jews see anything harsh, blunt, offensive, unpleasant, or taboo. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Citation Requests

Removed text:

"It is very common for Jewish children whose families do not have trees to envy Christian friends who do[citation needed]. Some families feel that it is important for children to understand and value the difference between Judaism and Christianity and refuse to have a "Christmas tree" in their home. On the other hand, it is not unusual for a Jewish family simply to have a Christmas tree and call it by that name[citation needed]. The "Hanukkah bush" falls somewhere between these extremes."

"A typical"

If someone can find citations that substantiate the "very common" and the "it is not unusual", please cite and put back into the article.

Thanks --Igoldste 17:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Novi God

I'm confused by the Novi God reference. Is this something that is just celebrated by Russian Jews as the text implies? Also, the text implies that Russian immigrants of other religion have dropped this practice while the Russian Jews have continued it. Can someone clarify?

Thanks --Igoldste 17:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Too many quotes

I've deleted the quote farm tag from the article. We're not using quotes as a collection of quotations here, so I don't think the simple tag is appropriate. --Prosfilaes (talk) 13:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

I put it up because I strongly believe there are too many quotes for an article about something so simple (in my opinion, parts of this article should just be merged into this but that's another story). I have yet to see any other page on Wikipedia that has more quotes than info. Therefore I think the tag is very appropriate. --Fez2005 (talk) 02:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The quotations are no more nor less than the references for the article. I wrote quite a bit of this, and I was very concerned about providing references. This is a very tricky cultural issue, because:
  • there is a wide spread of Jewish opinion about the practice;
  • because some unfamiliar with the phrase questioned whether it was really a widespread phenomenon;
  • and because there were some editors who seemed to me to be involved in the "culture wars" and seemed to feel that the very phrase "Hanukkah bush" was somehow an affront to Christians.
I couldn't find any comprehensive references, so instead of using generalities that couldn't be referenced, I decided to use specifics that show the range of opinion by showing what individual authorities have said about it.
I believe what I did was fully in keeping of the spirit of WP:CITE, and I don't think there's any problem with the article having too many quotations. I won't delete the tag myself because I'm too directly involved in editing of this article. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who questioned the wideness of the "phenomenon," I can assure you I am very familiar w/the term - it's one of the reasons I question just how widespread this suppose practice is. I still vote to get rid of this page in place of a minor mention in a larger article somewhere.FlaviaR (talk) 23:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
The quotes are not longer than the rest of the article. It is more dependent on quotes than most articles, but I don't see that as a bad thing in this case; it works as an article.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to stop arguing about this as I have better things I can do in life than discuss Wikipedia. However I just want to end on the note that when I first read the article, the whole style of it felt very un-Wikipedia-like. And I'm sure many people who would come across the article would agree. I'm not saying that the tree of quotes is a bad thing, but perhaps they would fit better on a blog, a separate website, or an MLA-formatted essay than in Wikipedia. --Fez2005 (talk) 08:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Most people believe that most reasonable people agree with them. Without evidence, it's hardly a helpful statement.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Gertrude Berg/ Ed Sullivan Episode?

Would someone post more specific information about the 1959 episode in which Gertrude Berg spoke about the Hanukkah Bush? I would like to find the original air date of this episode. The footage is needed for a documentary about the life of Gertrude Berg.

98.204.68.239 (talk) 19:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Peter @ The Ciesla Foundation

cieslafdn@aol.com