Talk:Hansel and Gretel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Germany Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

I moved this image here: it adds no information to Hansel and gretel. Perhaps at Eating disorder? --Wetman 02:14, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 Poor Jacob! Poor Wilhelm! 2 Original Version? 3 spoiler tag 4 Another version 5 Movie/TV Version - Help! 6 Vandalism 7 Notable derivatives? 8 The real story?

[edit] Poor Jacob! Poor Wilhelm!

Re DIFFERENCE. Well, maybe in Bulgaria the story is told according to the plot outlined in the article. But this is not, DEFINITELY NOT, the story that Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm have written. Imagine an article on Hamlet without a mention of any foul deed or even the fact that it is a play.
It may also be of interest to the reader that in Switzerland Ovid is considered to have written the Metamorphoses. Please note: WRITTEN, not "collected". Of course, even in Switzerland some people can be found who hold forth instead that Ovid "collected" the Metamorphoses and that the "original" material was less "sanitized" and had an other "meaning" et cetera et cetera et cetera. The difference is that in Switzerland such people are not taken seriously. --BZ(Bruno Zollinger) 09:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Original Version?

The secion titled "Analysis" is extremely confusing and unclear. It claims that the Grimm version is sanitised, and mentions that in the medieval version, Hansel and Gretel are left in the woods to die or disappear, but this is virtually exactly what the Plot Synopsis section says happens. Unless of course the original version simply goes "Hansel and Gretel were taken out into the woods and abandoned. They starved to death. The End." If not, the article might benefit from explaining how it is sanitised. Reveilled 22:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I clarified a bit. It's a sanitized yes. The story arose out of the very real and horrific practice of leaving babies and children to die of exposure outside when there was not enough food, which was the origin of the original tale, not exactly what the BG version focuses on. -- Stbalbach 23:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I still don't understand. The plot synopsis says "Fearing starvation, the wood cutter's wife—the children's step-mother—convinces him to lead the children into the forest, and abandon them there", and the analysis claims it is a sanitised version because "in reality children were often left in the woods to die or disappear because no one could feed them in times of strife". Perhaps it is the language making this confusing, but the use of "sanitised" to me suggests cleaning an earlier story, not that it is just a fairytale version of a common occurrence. Thus, when I read the Analysis section, it seems to tell me that there is a medieval version of the story which was sanitised for 19th century Middle-class readers. Given that it also mentions the practice of infanticide, which is the plan of the step-mother in the Grimm version, I do not understand particularly how this has been sanitised, as opposed to dramatised, unless in the medieval, unsanitised version, Hansel and Gretel die of starvation. Reveilled 14:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Reveilled is right. At the bottom it makes out that the abandonment was left out to sanitize the story, yet the synopsis at the top does include the abandonment. Thus it hasn't been sanitized. 'Sanitized' would be a version in which the kids simply got lost while taking a walk in the forest, which is not the version given in the article.

Edit: Oh, I understand. It's that because the practice no longer continues, at least in the western world, that aspect of the story no longer has the same cultural significance, not that it's been removed. Noneofyourbusiness 18:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] spoiler tag

The German Wikipedia has done away with the spoiler tag entirely. Gone. On the English Wikipedia, the spoiler tag remains very controversial and is not anywhere close to policy, or even official recommendation. The basic problem is this: Any article dealing with a story: (movie, book, fairytale, etc..) should have a spoiler tag, because encyclopedia articles by design and purpose spoil stories. Thus, the spoil tag is redundant and self-evident. Encyclopedia's spoil, that is what they do. If you don't want to spoil the story, don't read an encyclopedia article about the story! This argument is so persuasive and evident that the worlds second biggest Wikipedia banned use of the spoiler tag entirely. The English wikipedia has not been able to achieve consensus on this issue to date, but the spoiler tag remains very controversial. IMO I won't fight about it in certain cases, but articles that clearly are designed to spoil (the section heading is "Plot synopsis"!) it's really taking what is already a controversial tag too far. -- Stbalbach 00:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I actually like it, but putting it on an article about such a short story seems kind of silly. Brutannica 22:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Removed again and left edit note. If someone feels strongly about adding it I'll open it up for a straw poll and RfC it. -- Stbalbach 15:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Fairy tales are definitely in the public domain, so a spoiler tag is probably not necessary.

[edit] Another version

There's another tale that ressembles hansel & gretel and it's told in the Extremadura region of Spain. It's called "the Stepmother" (La Madrastra) and it's also about two parents that want to abandon their children at the forest, but there isn't any witch or bread house. Maybe I could write the article about it someday...

[edit] Movie/TV Version - Help!

I'm trying to track down a Hansel and Gretel I saw on tv in the early 90's. The witch's house is all white and the walls are filled with colorful goo and the chairs and tables - everything is white but filled with bright colored edidble goo. The kids have a step mother and eat nasty green blobs. Does anyone know what this is? 128.205.136.233 20:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I reverted a bunch of vandalism but there is still a paragraph in the plot synopsis that looks bogus. If someone familiar with the page could check it over, that would be good. —tedp 14:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notable derivatives?

Isn't that usually called Trivia? I mean, Buffy the Vampire Slayer bases an episode from an old Fairy Tale, isn't really notable. Its Trivia.

Notable derivatives would be various versions found long ago, like BZ(Bruno Zollinger) mentioned. 04:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Of course I agree that Buffy is not notable, because it is a minor derivative and not a primary adaptation. But notability has nothing to do with age, a common misconception on Wikipedia that only "old" pop culture is notable. -- Stbalbach 13:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh. I was thinking of the original source, and how it popped up in times of old, differant nations altering the story, and no one entirely certain which was the original form. Seeing how folktales evolved seems differant to me than modern day writers using old stories in the place of new ideas. But yes, the age of anything is irrelevant. I believe shows like the Simpsons do parodies of everything new and old, that easier than coming up with new ideas. Dream Focus 03:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The real story?

Am I the only who has ever heard of the real story it's based on? We learned at school that in I think 2005 the house of the which was discovered in germany. The real story was different Hans and Grietje were cake and pie makers but they wanted the recepee of an old woman in the woods. They sued her as which couple of times but she was cleared of all charges(documents exist) finally they formed a mob and burned the house with the woman in it. The recepee was found in her oven in 2005 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.200.70.173 (talk • contribs)

Got a citation for this? You might be thinking of Weinstein's Hoodwinked. I wouldn't be surprised if this were part of the plot to the film's sequel, as it is supposed to involve H and G. I'll be glad to add this interpretation to the article once you can show that it is verifiable. (Oh, and new comments go at the bottom of the talk page.) --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The German Wikipedia article [1] lists this "real" version of the story in its parody section. There seems to be a book by illustrator and comic book writer Hans Traxler: "Die Wahrheit über Hänsel und Gretel" (1st ed. 1963). Apparently the story originates from there - a tale of a respectable baker woman Katharina Schraderin brutally murdered by a jealous ex-lover Hans and his sister Grete due to a dispute over a gingerbread recipe. It's a science satire of sorts, about a bloke who discovers this amazing truth through scientific method, and it is so well-written that it has apparently become an urban legend. I've seen the story cited as a "truth" in a gingerbread cookbook myself. Traxler seems to be a renowned caricaturist and parodist in Germany. This is what I got out of the article with my very limited understanding of German... I don't think this variation should be mentioned at all in the main article, unless in a separate Parody section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.29.196.160 (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)