Talk:Hannah Harper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[edit] Hannah Harper not married ??

I recently read an interview on lukeisback - owned by Luke Ford (porn reporter) - with Ben English, the male British pornstar.

It seems that Ben was married to Hannah Harper. At the time they met (professionaly) she seemed to be married already.(It doesn't say to whom) After a few months they seemed to start an affair that ended in a divorce on her side. She then married Ben and eventually also divorced him.

Source: http://www.lukeisback.com/stars/stars/ben_english.htm

This comment was added by Russiandragon

[edit] Official webpage

There seems to be some debate about what her official website is. I have two seperate interviews where it is clearly indicated that her official website is hannahharper.net:

In the second interview, she clearly indicates that there is an imposter on MySpace:

"Wankus assumed because Harper's site was dot-net, she was still fighting with someone over her name. Harper sounded exasperated and said the guy who has it has been talking to people on MySpace passing himself off as Harper. Wankus said a good attorney could put the grab on it for her. Harper said the guy was being very clever and also turned her name into a design company, Hannah Harper Designs. Wankus, again dispensing free legal advice, told Harper she had a case she could win. Harper reminded Wankus of some earlier miscommunications between the two of them because Wankus was sending inquiries to the dot-com address and the owner was passing himself off as Harper." (emphasis added)

I believe the case is clear as to what her official home page is. Tabercil 22:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Looks like 75.70.150.153 is at it again. He removed the "needs citation" tag from the paragraph describing which site she is associated with. I wrote him on his talk page that "Citation is necessary to ensure that the claim is credible and can be checked by any reader or editor". Vinh1313 17:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh and I went ahead and referenced Tabercil's citations in the article. Vinh1313 18:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)