From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
|
Hamlet (1964 film) is part of WikiProject Shakespeare, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Can't understand this sentence
This sentence is very unclear one: And this version of Hamlet is a shameless fraud who scare people around with fake ghost to gain power. Is it Hamlet who is a fraud, or is it this version of the play, or what?—Vitriden 17:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Certain Puzzles
I just put the essay into better English, but some puzzles remain. The sentence questioned above I think I clarified, but what about the "mechanics" that Hamlet enjoys accompanying? These must be the Players. And isn't he carried out onto the battlements, dead, at the end, rather than going out under his own steam? I haven't seen the movie (which seems to be hard to get), so someone should continue to correct my corrections! Jrmccall 17:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, he does walk out to die outside - and there is then a funeral march as he is carried out of the castle. I have just added some material, and references, as well as deleting a few things which were either not relevant to the film, or misreadings of the cited refs (e.g. the bit about the imprisonment of Pasternak and Smoktunovsky which is actually contradicted by other sources).Lampernist (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)