Talk:Hamiltonian path
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Icosian Calculus
A conception of a system, or family of systems, of non-commutative roots of unity for geometrical interpretation. Icosian Calculus involves roots with different exponents and not requiring the distributive property of multiplication. In these calculuations, values entering only as connecting exponents and not as connecting terms.
- [to be finished;]
- [solutions of hamilitonian circuits]
- above stuff deleted from main page since it doesn't have much to do with Hamiltonian paths. Populus 19:21, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC)
-
- doesn't have much to do with?
- Hamilton Icosian Calculus used to investigate closed edge paths on a dodecahedron that visit each vertex exactly once.
- http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Hamilton/Icosian/
-
-
- I think it might make more sense to talk about this as part of the history, since Hamilton's icosian calculus doesn't have much to do with the hamiltionian path problem as studied today. I will try to come up with something. Populus 20:26, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC)
-
- Hamiltonian Circuit Experiment Program - Offer prize of one million dollars promised to those who solve the seven problems unsolved at the end of 20th century, one being the NP-Complete Problem which would solve the "Hamiltonian Circuit Problem".
- dumping this link too---it's actually a would-be program for finding Hamiltonian paths that hasn't been updated in a while Populus 19:28, 11 Sep 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Separated article
I separated Hamiltonian path and Hamiltonian path problem. Although they are related, I think it is clearer to put them on separate pages. MathMartin 17:58, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rudrata path
Some authors (notably, Dasgupta, Papadimitriou, & Vazirani in their Algorithms, 2006) call the Hamilton path the "Rudrata path" after the Kashmiri poet Rudrata who originated the concept of the knight's tour on a chessboard. I don't think this term is widespread enough yet to be worth including in the article, but it may be worth thinking about in future. Gdr 11:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Better example image
I think we might need a better example image - at first I just stared at the image unsure what to look for. After refreshing my memory I noticed that the black line was actually the path travelled. I slighly updated the description, but I think we need a better example here. CharonX/talk 19:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- I added an example I found on the German Wikipedia article. Maybe the other one should be removed, it seems somewhat hard to follow. Arthena(talk) 21:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Contradiction: Tournaments
Why does this article seem to contradict itself?
"every [[tournament] has an odd number of Hamiltonian paths"
"A tournament (with more than 2 vertices) is Hamiltonian if and only if it is strongly connected."
These statements do not seem to agree. --AlanH (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)