Hammerhead ribozyme
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Hammerhead Ribozyme | ||
|---|---|---|
 Stylized rendering of the full-length
hammerhead ribozyme RNA molecule |
||
| Scientific classification | ||
|
Hammerhead RNAs are small self-cleaving RNAs that have a conserved motif found in several of the viroids and satellite RNAs associated with plant RNA viruses and other species, and that replicate via a rolling circle mechanism. They were first discovered in 1986 in plant viroids,[1] and catalyze the sequence-specific cleavage of RNA phosphodiester bonds due to the three-dimensional structure that they form. The secondary structure resembles a hammerhead giving them their name.
[edit] Autocatalyst or Ribozyme?
In the natural state, a hammerhead RNA motif is a single strand of RNA, and although the cleavage is autocatalytic and takes place in the absence of protein enzymes, the hammerhead RNA itself is not a true enzyme in its natural state, as it cannot catalyze multiple turnovers.
In vitro hammerhead constructs can be engineered such that they consist of two RNA strands. The strand that gets cleaved can be supplied in excess, and multiple turnover can be demonstrated and shown to obey Michaelis-Menten kinetics, typical of protein enzyme kinetics. Such constructs are typically employed for in vitro experiments, and the term Hammerhead RNA has become in practice synonymous with the more frequently used Hammerhead Ribozyme.
The minimal Hammerhead ribozyme sequence that is catalytically active consists of three base-paired stems flanking a central core of 15 conserved (mostly invariant) nucleotides, as shown. The conserved central bases, with few exceptions, are essential for ribozyme’s catalytic activity. Such hammerhead ribozyme constructs exhibit a turnover rate (kcat) of about 1 molecule/minute and a Km on the order of 10 micromolar.
The hammerhead ribozyme is arguably the best-characterized ribozyme. Its small size, thoroughly-investigated cleavage chemistry, known crystal structures, and its biological relevance make the hammerhead ribozyme particularly well-suited for biochemical and biophysical investigations into the fundamental nature of RNA catalysis.
Hammerhead ribozymes may play an important role as therapeutic agents, as enzymes which tailor defined RNA sequences, as biosensors, and for applications in functional genomics and gene discovery.[2]
[edit] Species distribution
Hammerhead ribozymes are found in a wide range of plant viroids and helmenths such as:
- Peach latent mosaic viroid
- Eggplant latent viroid
- Avocado sunblotch viroid
- Velvet tobacco mottle virus Satellite RNA
- Schistosoma mansoni Satellite DNA [3]
- Dianthus caryophyllus viroid-like DNA
- Cherry small circular viroid-like RNA
- Newt
- Dolichopoda cave cricket
[edit] The Chemistry of Catalysis
The Hammerhead Ribozyme carries out a very simple chemical reaction that results in the breakage of the substrate strand of RNA, specifically at C17, the cleavage-site nucleotide. Although RNA cleavage is often referred to as hydrolysis, the mechanism employed does not in fact involve the addition of water. Rather, the cleavage reaction is simply an isomerization that consists of rearrangement of the linking phosphodiester bond. It is the same reaction, chemically, that occurs with random base-mediated RNA degradation, except that it is highly site-specific and the rate is accelerated 10,000-fold or more.
[edit] Cleavage is by Phosphodiester Isomerization, not Hydrolysis
The cleavage reaction is a phosphodiester isomerization reaction that is initiated by abstraction of the cleavage-site ribose 2’-hydroxyl proton from the 2’-oxygen, which then becomes the attacking nucleophile in an “in-line” or SN2(P)-like reaction, although it is not known whether this proton is removed prior to or during the chemical step of the hammerhead cleavage reaction. (The cleavage reaction is technically not bimolecular, but behaves in the same way a genuine SN2(P) reaction does; it undergoes inversion of configuration subsequent to forming an associative transition-state consisting of a pentacoordinated oxyphosphrane.) The attacking and leaving group oxygens will both occupy the two axial positions in the trigonal bipyramidal transition-state structure as is required for an SN2-like reaction mechanism.
The 5’-product, as a result of this cleavage reaction mechanism, possesses a 2’,3’-cyclic phosphate terminus, and the 3’-product possesses a 5’-OH terminus, as with nonezymatic alkaline cleavage of RNA. The reaction is therefore, in principle, reversible, as the scissile phosphate remains a phosphodiester, and may thus act as a substrate for hammerhead RNA-mediated ligation without a requirement for ATP or a similar exogenous energy source. The hammerhead ribozyme-catalyzed reaction, unlike the formally identical non-enzymatic alkaline cleavage of RNA, is a highly sequence-specific cleavage reaction with a typical turnover rate of approximately 1 molecule of substrate per molecule of enzyme per minute at pH 7.5 in 10 mM Mg2+ (so-called “standard reaction conditions” for the minimal hammerhead RNA sequence), depending upon the sequence of the particular hammerhead ribozyme construct measured. This represents an approximately 10,000-fold rate enhancement over the nonezymatic cleavage of RNA.
[edit] Requirement for Divalent Metal Ions
All ribozymes were originally thought to be metallo-enzymes, in the sense that they were assumed to require the presence of divalent cations, such as Mg2+, for both folding and catalysis. It was presumed that hexahydrated magnesium ions, which exist in equilibrium with magnesium hydroxide, could play the roles of general acid and general base, in a way analogous to those played by two histidines in RNase A. An additional role for divalent metal ions has also been proposed in the form of electrostatic stabilization of the transition-state.
[edit] The Hammerhead is not a Metallo-Enzyme
In 1998 it was discovered that the hammerhead ribozyme, as well as the VS ribozyme and hairpin ribozyme, do not require the presence of metal ions for catalysis, provided a sufficiently high concentration of monovalent cation is present to permit the RNA to fold. This discovery suggested that the RNA itself, rather than serving as an inert, passive scaffold for the binding of chemically active divalent metal ions, is instead itself intimately involved in the chemistry of catalysis. The latest structural results, described below, indeed confirm that two invariant nucleotides, G12 and G8, are positioned consistent with roles as the general base and general acid in the hammerhead cleavage reaction.
Strictly speaking, therefore, the hammerhead ribozyme cannot be a metallo-enzyme.
[edit] Primary and Secondary Structure of the Hammerhead Ribozyme
[edit] The Minimal Hammerhead Ribozyme
The minimal hammerhead sequence that is required for the self-cleavage reaction includes approximately 13 conserved or invariant "core" nucleotides, most of which are not involved in forming canonical Watson-Crick base-pairs. The core region is flanked by Stems I, II and III, which are in general comprised of canonical Watson-Crick base-pairs but are otherwise not constrained with respect to sequence. The catalytic turnover rate of minimal hammerhead ribozymes is ~ 1/min (a range of 0.1/min to 10/min is commonly observed, depending upon the identify of the nonconserved sequences and the lengths of the three helical stems). Much of the experimental work carried out on hammerhead ribozymes has used a minimal construct.
[edit] Type I & Type III Hammerhead RNA
| Hammerhead ribozyme (type I) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
||||||||||
|
| Hammerhead ribozyme (type III) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
||||||||||
|
Structurally the hammerhead ribozyme is composed of three base paired helices, separated by short linkers of conserved sequence. These helices are called I, II and III. Hammerhead ribozymes can be classified into three types based on which helix the 5' and 3' ends are found in. If the 5' and 3' ends of the sequence contribute to stem I then it is a type I hammerhead ribozyme, and if the and 3' ends of the sequence contribute to stem III then it is a type III hammerhead ribozyme. Of the three possible topological types both type I and type III are common. It is not known if examples of the type II topology are found in nature.
[edit] The Full-Length Hammerhead Ribozyme
The full-length hammerhead ribozyme consists of additional sequence elements in Stems I and II that permit additional tertiary contacts to form. The tertiary interactions stabilize the active conformation of the ribozyme, resulting in cleavage rates up to 1000-fold greater than those for corresponding minimal hammerhead sequences. [5]
[edit] Tertiary Structure of the Minimal Hammerhead Ribozyme
The minimal hammerhead ribozyme has been exhaustively studied by biochemists and enzyeologists as well as by Xray crystallographers, NMR spectroscopists, and other practitioners of biophysical techniques. The first detailed three-dimensional structural information for a hammerhead ribozyme appeared in 1994 in the form of an X-ray crystal structure of a hammerhead riboyme bound to a DNA substrate analogue, published in Nature by Pley, Flaherty and McKay. Subsequently, an all-RNA minimal hammerhead ribozyme structure was published by Scott, Finch and Klug in Cell in early 1995.
The minimal hammerhead ribozyme is composed of three base paired helices, separated by short linkers of conserved sequence as shown by the crystal structure.[6] These helices are called I, II and III. The conserved uridine-turn links helix I to helix II and usually contains the sequence CUGA. Helix II and III are linked by a sequence GAAA. The cleavage reaction occurs between helix III and I, and is usually a C.
The structure of a full length ribozyme shows that there are extensive interactions between the loop of stem II and stem I.[7]
Hammerhead ribozymes can be divided into three classes according to which of the three stems is formed from the 5' and 3' end of the sequence region. If stem III is formed from the 5' and 3' most parts of the sequence they are known as class III.
[edit] The Ensuing Structure-Function Dilemma
Despite the observations of hammerhead ribozyme catalysis in a crystal of the minimal hammerhead sequence in which the crystal lattice packing contacts by necessity confined the global positions of the distal termini of all three flanking helical stems, many biochemical experiments designed to probe transition-state interactions and the chemistry of catalysis appeared to be irreconcilable with the crystal structures.
For example, the invariant core residues G5, G8, G12 and C3 in the minimal hammerhead ribozyme were each observed to be so fragile that changing even a single exocyclic functional group on any one of these nucleotides results in a dramatic reduction or abolition of catalytic activity, yet few of these appeared to form hydrogen bonds involving the Watson-Crick faces of these nucleotide bases in any of the minimal hammerhead structures, apart from a G-5 interaction in the product structure.
A particularly striking and only recently observed example consisted of G8 and G12, which were identified36 as possible participants in acid/base catalysis. Once it was demonstrated that the hammerhead RNA does not require divalent metal ions for catalysis, it gradually became apparent that that the RNA itself, rather than passively bound divalent metal ions, must play a direct chemical role in any acid-base chemistry in the hammerhead ribozyme active site. It was however completely unclear how G12 and G8 could accomplish this, given the original structures of the minimal hammerhead ribozyme.
Other concerns included an NOE between U4 and U7 of the cleaved hammerhead ribozyme that had also been observed during NMR characterization, which suggested that these nucleotide bases must approach one another closer than about 6 Å, although close approach of U7 to U4 did not appear to be possible from the crystal structure. Finally, as previously discussed, the attacking nucleophile in the original structures, the 2’-OH of C17, was not in a position amenable to in-line attack upon the adjacent scissile phosphate.
Perhaps most worrisome were experiments that suggested the A-9 and scissile phosphates must come within about 4 Å of one anther in the transition-state, based upon double phosphorothioate substitution and soft metal ion rescue experiments; the distance between these phosphates in the minimal hammerhead crystal structure was about 18 Å, with no clear mechanism for close approach if the Stem II and Stem I A-form helices were treated as rigid bodies. Taken together, these results appeared to suggest that a fairly large-scale conformational change must have take place in order to reach the transition-state within the minimal hammerhead ribozyme structure.
For these reasons, the two sets of experiments (biochemical vs. crystallographic) appeared not only to be at odds, but to be completely and hopelessly irreconcilable, generating a substantial amount of discord in the field. No compelling evidence for dismissing either set of experimental results was ever made successfully, although many claims to the contrary were made in favor of each.
[edit] Tertiary Structure of the Full-Length Hammerhead Ribozyme
In 2006 a 2.2 Å resolution crystal structure of the full-length hammerhead ribozyme was obtained. This new structure (shown on the right) appears to resolve the most worrisome of the previous discrepancies. In particular, C17 is now positioned for in-line attack, and the invariant residues C3, G5, G8 and G12 all appear involved in vital interactions relevant to catalysis. Moreover, the A9 and scissile phosphates are observed to be 4.3 Å apart, consistent with the idea that, when modified, these phosphates could bind a single thiophilic metal ion. The structure also reveals how two invariant residues, G-12 and G-8, are positioned within the active site consistent with their previously proposed role in acid/base catalysis. G12 is within hydrogen bonding distance to the 2’–O of C17, the nucleophile in the cleavage reaction, and the ribose of G8 hydrogen bonds to the leaving group 5’-O. (see below), while the nucleotide base of G8 forms a Watson-Crick pair with the invariant C3. This arrangement permits one to suggest that G12 is the general base in the cleavage reaction, and that G8 may function as the general acid, consistent with previous biochemical observations. G5 hydrogen bonds to the furanose oxygen of C17, helping to position it for in-line attack. U4 and U7, as a consequence of the base-pair formation between G8 and C3, are now positioned such that an NOE between their bases is easily explained.
The crystal structure of the full-length hammerhead ribozyme thus clearly addresses all of the major concerns that appeared irreconcilable with the previous crystal structures of the minimal hammerhead ribozyme.
[edit] Structure and Catalysis
The tertiary interactions in the full-length hammerhead ribozyme stabilize what strongly appears to be the active conformation. The nucleophile, the 2'-oxygen of the cleavage-site nucleotide, C17, is aligned almost perfectly for an in-line attack (the SN2(P) reaction). G12 is positioned within hydrogen bonding distance of this nucleophile, and therefore would be able to abstract a proton from the 2'-oxygen if G12 itself becomes deprotonated. The 2'-OH of G8 forms a hydrogen bond to the 5'-leaving group oxygen, and therefore potentially may supply a proton as negative charge accumulates on the 5'-oxygen of the ribose of A1.1.
The most likely explanation is then that G12, in the deprotonated form, is the general base, and the ribose of G8 is the general acid. The apparent kinetic pKa of the hammerhead ribozyme is 8.5, whereas the pKa of guanosine is about 9.5. It is possible that the pKa of G12 is perturbed from 9.5 to 8.5 in the hammerhead catalytic core; this hypothesis is currently the subject of intense investigation.
If the invariant G8 is changed to C8, hammerhead catalysis is abolished. However, a G8C + C3G double-mutant that maintains the G8-C3 base pair found in the full-length hammerhead restores most of the catalytic activity. The 2'-OH of G8 has also been observed to be essential for catalysis; replacement of G8 with deoxyG8 greatly reduces the rate of catalysis, suggesting the 2'-OH is indeed crucial to the catalytic mechanism.
The close approach of the A9 and scissile phosphates requires the presence of a high concentration of positive charge. This is probably the source of the observation that divalent metal ions are required at low ionic strength, but can be dispensed with at higher concentrations of monovalent cations.
The reaction thus likely involves abstraction of the 2'-proton from C17, followed by nucleophilic attack upon the adjacent phosphate. As the bond between the scissile phosphorus and the 5'-O leaving group begins to break, a proton is supplied from the ribose of G8, which then likely reprotonates at the expense of a water molecule observed to hydrogen bond to it in the crystal structure.
[edit] Open Questions
[edit] Therapeutic applications
Modified hammerhead ribozymes are being tested as therapeutic agents.[8] Synthetic RNAs containing sequences complementary to the mutant SOD1 mRNA and sequences necessary to form the hammerhead catalytic structure are being studied as a possible therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Work is also underway to find out whether they could be used to engineer HIV resistant lines of T-cells.
The therapeutic use of trans-cleaving hammerhead ribozymes has been severely hampered by its low-level activity in vivo. The true catalytic potential of trans-cleaving hammerhead ribozymes may be recouped in vivo and therapeutic derivatives are likely to complement other nucleic acid hybridizing therapeutic strategies. Already there are hammerhead ribozymes which are close to clinical application.[2]
[edit] References
- ^ Prody GA, Bakos JT, Buzayan JM, Schneider IR, Breuning G (1986). "Autolytic Processing of Dimeric Plant Virus Satellite RNA". Science 231 (4745): 1577–1580. doi:.
- ^ a b Hean J and Weinberg MS (2008). "The Hammerhead Ribozyme Revisited: New Biological Insights for the Development of Therapeutic Agents and for Reverse Genomics Applications", RNA and the Regulation of Gene Expression: A Hidden Layer of Complexity. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-25-7.
- ^ Ferbeyre G, Smith JM, Cedergren R. (1998). "Schistosome satellite DNA encodes active hammerhead ribozymes". Mo. Cell. Biol. 18 (7): 3880–3888. PMID 9632772.
- ^ Pley, HW; Flaherty KM, McKay DB (1994). "Three-dimensional structure of a hammerhead ribozyme". Nature 372: 68–74. doi:. PMID 7969422.
- ^ Khvorova A, Lescoute A, Westhof E, Jayasena SD. (2003). "Sequence elements outside the hammerhead ribozyme catalytic core enable intracellular activity". Nat Struct Biol. 10 (9): 708–712. doi:. PMID 12881719.
- ^ Scott WG, Finch JT, Klug A. (1995). "The crystal structure of an all-RNA hammerhead ribozyme: a proposed mechanism for RNA catalytic cleavage". Cell 81 (7): 991–1002. doi:. PMID 7541315.
- ^ Martick M, Scott WG (2006). "Tertiary contacts distant from the active site prime a ribozyme for catalysis". Cell 126 (2): 309–320. doi:. PMID 16859740.
- ^ Citti L, Rainaldi G. (2005). "Synthetic hammerhead ribozymes as therapeutic tools to control disease genes". Current Gene Therapy 5 (1): 11–24. PMID 15638708.
