Talk:Hall & Woodhouse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
From the introduction: "Badger Brewery is an independent family brewery... owned by the company Hall and Woodhouse, which also operates over 250 pubs."
- It doesn't sound very independant, if it's owned by someone else
- It doesn't sound like a family brewery, if it's owned by a company.
What's the reasoning behind the introduction? Ojw 17:59, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I assume what is meant is that Hall and Woodhouse is a small independent business. I think the Badger Brewery is their only brewery now their one in Dorchester is closed. Joe D (t) 18:02, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Camra seem to think that anything not owned by one of the 4 big corperate mofo breweries is independant. 2 of there golden boys, wychwood and brakspear are both owned by the same company. --Pypex 15:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
- Its not CAMRA's fault its mine - I had to quickly merge the Badger and the Hall and Woodhouse entries as it didnt make much sense having both and there was a lot of overlap. Please feel free to fix - I dont know much about the ownership of Hall and Woodhouse, but I giess it is not too hard to find out how much it is family owned or whether it is just the brewery. Justinc 22:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Hall&WoodhouseLogo.jpg
Image:Hall&WoodhouseLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
