Talk:Hal Rogers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Hal Rogers is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. The options are: "FA", "A", "GA", "B", "Start", "Stub", "List", "Disambiguation", "Template", or "Category."
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. The options are: "Top", "High", "Mid", and "Low."
???	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", and "Event."

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

	Kentucky Portal Hal Rogers is within the scope of WikiProject Kentucky, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested! • Become a Member • Project Talk
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

[edit] "Campaign mud"

172 - The text you deleted - completely - was from a NY Times article, not something dreamed up by a rabid blogger. If you believe the information is false, or irrelevant, please make your case on this page. Otherwise, please leave the information (which I'm putting back) as is, or add to it to make it more "balanced" (as you so define).

And if you'd like to go to arbitration on this, I'd be happy to do so. I don't think this a subjective matter at all. John Broughton 17:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Info Dearth?

I understand that this guy's an asshole, but is this really all the information we have on him? I don't mean to say that the fact that he's an asshole should be removed or even disputed, but he's been in Congress for nearly 3 decades! Can we try to at least expand on his assholeness here? -Laikalynx (talk) 02:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)