User talk:Hai-updater
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Too much link !
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
I know the "unverified" statement may have shocked you but I strongly think that you shouldn't overdo it ^^.
I greatly recommend you to read about the Wikipedia:Citing sources guidelines to help you redacting that article. Reading WP:LIVING may also help you as wikipedia is very sensible about doing article about living people, there should be no defamatory nor unverified claim in a living people article (well in your particular case you have a very low risk to encounter that problem, but you never know.
I personally find that this article meet the notability guideline by far. If you need any help improving that article, leave me a comment on my talk page.
P.S. woops I forgot to sign this page : -- Esurnir 20:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. -- Esurnir 20:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Question about max
I would like to know, is Max Essex a virologist ? I'm trying to categorize him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Esurnir (talk • contribs) 20:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] HAI
Thanks for your contributions about the HAI at Harvard School of Public Health AIDS Initiative- but they have been deleted because the text was taken directly from a copyrighted source at the official site. You are welcome to repost with your own text, but we cannot accept text from copyrighted sources. Staecker 19:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Max-essex.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Max-essex.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright
As wikipedia is distributed under free license that may be redistributed, the picture that you provided can't be used in the max essex article. You need to provide a picture not protected by any copyright (a simple picture from a website is protected by a copyright, copyright don't require a mention to be held.
The best way to get a "free license" picture is either asking the website to license you this picture under a "free license" (read : public domain, creative commons, GFDL). Or take a picture yourself then releasing it under Creative Commons, GFDL or Public Domain. (the most protective legal code would be Creative Commons, where you agree to let other use this picture as they wish as long as they attribute this picture back to you, but you must grant "commercial use right" of your work).
If you got any question to to my talk page or answer here. -- Esurnir 19:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commercial use of Image:Max-essex-2007.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Max-essex-2007.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Max-essex-2007.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Max-essex-2007.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Max-essex-small.jpg
Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 21:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image source problem with Image:Max-essex-small.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Max-essex-small.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 11:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
