Hadith of prohibition of Mut'ah at Khaybar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article or section contains too many quotations for an encyclopedic entry. Please improve the article or discuss proposed changes on the talk page. You can edit the article to add more encyclopedic text or link the article to a page of quotations, possibly one of the same name, on Wikiquote. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for further suggestions. (March 2008) |
Part of a series on the |
|
Topics | |
Hadith regarding its legality | |
|
One single (Arabic: Ahaad) famous recorded oral tradition among Muslims (Arabic: Hadith) is about the legality of temporary marriage (Arabic: Nikah Mut'ah) and the Battle of Khaybar.
Although that narration is prominently quoted and referred to, it is not given any formal name, in contrast to other hadith such as the Hadith of the pond of Khumm or the Hadith of Qur'an and Sunnah.
Contents |
[edit] The narration
Timing:
The hadith refers to the Battle of Khaybar in Safar of 7 AH, on the evening of the victory.
[edit] Views
This hadith is primarily notable because it is very prominently referred to when discussing Hadiths regarding the legality of Nikah Mut'ah.
[edit] Sunni View
Most Sunnis regard this hadith as authentic (Sahih).
[edit] Positive
Most Sunni argue that this hadith unambiguously proves the prohibition of Mut'ah. This is mostly due to the hadith being included in the Two Sahihs: Sahi Muslim [1] and Sahih Bukhari [2], the later being referred to as "The most authentic book after the Qur'an" [3], and some have taunted the Shi'a for ignoring the verdicts (Arabic: fatwa) of Ali himself[citation needed].
Ibn Kathir, a 14th century Sunni Islamic scholar stated in his Tafsir of an-Nisa, 24 states [4]:
“ | Mujahid stated that, (So with those among them whom you have enjoyed, give them their required due,) was revealed about the Mut`ah marriage. A Mut`ah marriage is a marriage that ends upon a predetermined date. In the Two Sahihs, it is recorded that the Leader of the Faithful `Ali bin Abi Talib said, "The Messenger of Allah prohibited Mut`ah marriage and eating the meat of domesticated donkeys on the day of Khayber (battle). In addition, in his Sahih, Muslim recorded that Ar-Rabi` bin Sabrah bin Ma`bad Al-Juhani said that his father said that he accompanied the Messenger of Allah during the victory of Makkah, and that the Prophet said, (O people! I allowed you the Mut`ah marriage with women before. Now, Allah has prohibited it until the Day of Resurrection. Therefore, anyone who has any women in Mut`ah, let him let them go, and do not take anything from what you have given them.) Allah's statement, (but if you agree mutually (to give more) after the requirement (has been determined), there is no sin on you.) is similar to His other statement". | ” |
A list of those scholars authenticating this hadith include:
- Muhammad al-Bukhari, author of Sahih Bukhari [2]
- Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj, author of Sahi Muslim [1]
- Ibn Kathir [4]
[edit] Negative
However, there are some who those who are not equally convinced. Ibn al-Qayyim, a 14th century Sunni Islamic scholar writes [5]:
“ | In Khayber there were no Muslim women since it was a Jewish settlement and up till then, Muslims were not permitted to marry Ahl'ul Kitab (Jews & Christians). The permission came later on in Surah Mai'da, Muslims were not supposed to contract marriage with Ahl'ul Kitab during the battle of Khayber, and in any case they were not interested in marrying the women of their enemies before Khayber was captured. And after the victory, the ladies were captives or "Mamlookeen" and there was no need to marry them. Concerning the story of Khayber, the companions of the Prophet (S) did not contract temporary marriage with Jewish women neither did the Prophet (S) allow it, and no one mentioned Mut'ah during the battle of Khayber, on whether it was permissible or unlawful. Similarly all Muslim scholars unanimously say that Mut'ah was permissible after Khayber and they believe that it was cancelled on the Day of Fath Makka (victory). Therefore, it is clear that though this tradition is one of the two strongest amongst all traditions concerning the revocation of Mut'ah, it is nevertheless shaky, and cannot revoke a verdict contained in the Qur'an. | ” |
“ | If we accept that Mut'ah was cancelled on the Day of Khayber then what we are saying is that cancellation occurred twice and this has never happened in religion for sure and will not happen [6]. | ” |
Ibn Hajar Asqalani, a 15th century Sunni Shafi'i Islamic scholar writes:
“ | On Mut'ah's prohibition comments of Ibn Abbas have a weak chain. Whilst his fatwa on Mut'ah's permissibility is more Sahih [7] | ” |
Ali al-Qari, a 17th century Sunni Hanafi Islamic scholar writes:
“ | Ibn Zubayr mocked Ibn Abbas for issuing a fatwa on Mut'ah's permissibility and this event happened after the death of 'Ali, during the Khilafath of Ibn Zubayr and this proves that Ibn Abbas believed in the permissibility of Mut'ah until his dying days [8] | ” |
Others include:
- Umdat al-Qari Volume 8 page 311
- Allamah ibn Barr said that the tradition on the prohibition of Mut'ah on the Day of Khayber is wrong.
- Zad al-Ma'ad Volume 2 page 204 Ghazwa Khayber
- The tradition prohibiting Mut'ah during the victory of Makka is more Sahih.
- Fath al-Bari Volume 9 page 168
- Irshad al-Sari, Sharh al-Mawahib al-Ladunniyyah of Muhammad al-Zurqani vol.2 pg. 239, and Sharh al Muwatta vol.2 pg. 24, Abu Omar's opinion on the prohibition of Mut'ah at Khayber are cited:
- This is absolutely wrong. Temporary marriage never took place in Khayber.
- Rowz Al Anf vol. 4 pg. 59 (printed 1391 AH)
This is something that no one involved in the Seerah and the history Muhammad has ever acknowledged (that Mut'ah was prohibited on Khayber).
- Seera Halabiyah vol.3 pg.45
This is something that no one involved in the Seerah and the history of Muhammad has ever acknowledged (that Mut'ah was prohibited on Khayber).
- In Fath al-Bari vol.9 pg. 145 and Nayl al-Awtar vol.6 pg. 146, Sunan Baihaqi vol.7pg.201 and Zad al-Ma'ad Volume 1 pg. 443 Abu Awaanah is quoted as writing in his Sahih:
- "I have heard scholars saying that the tradition related of Ali only talked of the prohibition of the eating of the meat of domestic asses and there was no mention of Mut'ah, and the tradition is silent on that matter".
Then they quote Ibn Qayyim in Zad al-Ma'ad Volume 2 page 142:
- If we accept that Mut'ah was cancelled on the Day of Khayber then what we are saying is that cancellation occurred twice and this has never happened in religion for sure and will not happen.
[edit] Shi'a View
On basis of isnad, Shias reject hadith from Zuhri ibn Shab referring to the Muslim agreed upon idea that hadith from people that hate Ali cannot be accepted. Shia further argue that it is strange that Sunnis regard this hadith as authentic, since Ibn Hajar Asqalani[9] graded the two sons of Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyyah to be weak, arguing that one was a murijee, and the other to be a Shi'a [10].
On basis of matn, Shi'a view other hadith testify to Ali blaiming Umar for its prohibition, and arguing that those hadith are more credible. Further, Shi'a quote the non-Shi'a scholars who agree that no prohibition took place at Khaybar.
Shia's argue that since in all the hadith in Sahi Bukhari and in Sahi Muslim, numerous Sahaba reported that Muhammad declared haram only the eating of domestic asses and onion (or garlic), but nobody mentioning any kind of Mut'ah of any sort, it can be deducted that either did Muhammad not mentioned Nikah Mut'ah in that speech in 7 AH, or everyone forgot to mention it in their narration, including Ali.
Considering that Ibn Abbas was arguing the issue with Ibn Zubair around 15 AH, this would mean that Ali waited with narrating this hadith to anyone for eight years.
Shi'a argue that the authenticity of this single narration is contradicted by all other narrations of the event:
[edit] Salama ibn al-Akwa
- Yazid ibn Abu Ubaid also transmitted the above hadith Sahih Muslim 21:4775.
[edit] Anas ibn Malik
[edit] Abdullah ibn Abu Aufa
[edit] Al-Bara ibn Azib
- Sahih Bukhari 5:59:532
- Sahih Bukhari 5:59:533
- Sahih Bukhari 5:59:534
- Sahih Bukhari 7:67:434
- Sahih Muslim 21:4770
[edit] Jabir ibn Abd-Allah
- Sahih Bukhari 5:59:530
- Sahih Bukhari 7:67:429
- Sahih Bukhari 7:67:433
- Sahih Muslim 21:4779
- Sahih Muslim 21:4780
Above hadith has been transmitted on the authority of Ibn Jurayj.
[edit] Abd-Allah ibn Umar
- Sahih Bukhari 5:59:528
- Sahih Bukhari 5:59:529
- Sahih Bukhari 7:67:430
- Sahih Bukhari 7:67:431
- Sahih Muslim 21:4766
- Sahih Muslim 21:4767
[edit] Abu Tha'alba
[edit] Ibn Abbas
See also Sahih Bukhari 7:67:437
[edit] Targeting Ali and Ibn Abbas
They further argue that even if they were to accept that Mut'ah was forbidden on the Day of Khayber, there is still a question regarding why Ali and Abdullah ibn Abbas are the only ones who are quoted as saying so, specially since those are in forefront in the hadith that defended the legitimacy of Mut'ah.
They then conclude that it is logical to assume that the rest of the companions heard right and someone later on fabricated the Kahybar and Mut'ah hadith, and attributed it to those two who where the strongest defenders of Mut'ah, in order to strengthen their own arguments.
[edit] References
- ^ a b Sahih Muslim 8:3266, 8:3263, 8:3264 8:3265, 8:3267, 21:4763, 21:4764
- ^ a b Sahih Bukhari 7:67:432, 7:62:50, 5:59:527 , 9:86:91
- ^ ummah.net, islamonline.com, sunnah.org, yarehman.com, inter-islam.org, fatwa-online.com
- ^ a b site, offline as of 2006-09-29 Google Cache
- ^ Zad al-Ma'ad on page 183 (ref)
- ^ Zad al-Ma'ad Volume 1 page 442
- ^ Fath al-Bari Volume 9 p. 73
- ^ Mirqat Sharh Mishkat al-masabih Volume 6 p. 20 Dhikr Mut'ah
- ^ Tahdhib al-Tahdhib
- ^ ref