User talk:H@r@ld

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Battles of Narvik

Hello Harald! I am trying to raise some attention about Battles of Narvik at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Collaboration to see if that might help make it better. Inge 01:53, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi Inge. Great work you have been doing on this article! Which sources have you been using? The it resembles the English summary of the book by Major Andreas Hauge. I added an entry on the talk:Battles of Narvik page. H@r@ld 08:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh no. I have only made a few small contribs, I haven't written the article. I just felt it needed some attention. Maybe you would like to vote for it to be the Collaboration of the Fortnight? Inge 10:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello again. The article is now the current Collaboration of the fortnight. This would be the right time to push this article forward. I saw your good suggestion on the talk page and hope you would like to contribute more. Inge 12:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Getting Gnuplot to Work

Hey Harald, I'm trying to get Gnuplot to work and I appear to be having the same problem as you. Could you let me know if you figured out what the problem was, and if you got it figured out? Thanks Dwees

Sorry, but after some houres of debugging I gave up getting GNUplot to work. I have hoped that anyone posted a solution to the problem on the webpage for the extension. --H@r@ld 17:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:ECNU logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ECNU logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:ECNU logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ECNU logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rolf Groven

Please check discussion page for the article about Rolf Groven. Amarone 16:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Political Science terms in Norwegian and English

Re your post at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Politics#Can_someone_remove_some_red_links_from_this_list.3F.
I looked at your page. It's always interesting to see terminology in another language and compare different views on a subject. (And I see that the Norsk terms tend to be formed in a very straightforward way as compared with the English -- allmenningsproblemet vs "tragedy of the commons", formannskapsprinsippet vs "the body of aldermen doctrine", etc.)
However, it's also interesting to see that the listing of redlink terms as you posted it has hardly gotten any smaller in almost a year. It seems that English speakers just don't discuss political issues in the same way as Norwegians.
Also, I can give you a couple of suggestions for terms on your list [1] if you are interested.
-- Writtenonsand (talk) 14:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)