Talk:Gustavus Blin Wright

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gustavus Blin Wright article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

An entry from Gustavus Blin Wright appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 23 May 2007.

	Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	British Columbia Portal This article is part of the British Columbia WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Stub Class?

I'm a tad puzzled over the stub class rating. I don't assess articles, certainly the ones I begin, but I thought stubs were short and/or incomprehensible. Like it says on the quality scale for stubs: The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. I would like to think this article is neither, although it certainly can be improved upon. So could you please explain your assessment?CindyBo 07:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I would say the best explanation is that the assessment given was incorrect. --KenWalker | Talk 01:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)