From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Opera (Rated Start-Class) |
 |
This article falls within the scope of the Opera WikiProject, a collaboration to develop Wikipedia articles on operas and opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues, identify areas of neglect and exchange ideas. New members are very welcome! |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
|
| Columbia University WikiProject |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Columbia University WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Columbia University, her schools, environs, and people. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
|
|
Should this article be split into separate articles Gustav Kobbé and The Complete Opera Book? Both seem to be notable on their own and the material on the book is greater than that on Kobbé himself. Please comment. — AjaxSmack 23:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, splitting into separate articles seems reasonable to me. The book should go in the 'Opera publications' category along with Grove and 'Opera news'. -- Kleinzach (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, it is better to separate the book to a new article - Jay (talk) 04:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. It makes sense to me. Voceditenore (talk) 05:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Agreed - there is quite a bit more that could be written on the book (which has had several revisions since 1954) and probably not much more on the author. --GuillaumeTell (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Split away. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 19:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hurrah! Sedgefoot (talk) 22:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
