User talk:Gune

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Gune! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 23:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

==One Piece Attacks==

Okay let me give you a history lesson here. We DID have an attacks page on wikipedia. It was put up for deletation one day when we put others up. Whenever our pages get a deletation order on one page we end up with a dozen others like it, but thatsnot important.

IT started out we had attacks on character pages, however they looked scruffy there. They were not encyclopedic and we were forced into ditching them. Others wanted them kept so they had their own page. It was put up for deletation... Someone some were miffed about at the time. We had it put up after putting another page up for deletation (the person who sent it AfD decided to put some of our other pages for deletation to when we didn't want them done). We sent one week arguing over and over again with the greater wikipedia community about its importance... It was entirly useless everyone was against us, we even had it compared to a defunc list of dead porn stars at one point!

So we lost the page despite all our efforts. Bottom line was we were not allowed to have it. We do have the details elsewhere: here

Otherwise please stop saying we need them. We've already been down this path several months back. The greater wikipedia coummunity has more say then a handful of One Piece fans. They decided we didn't need the page, not us, we can't argue otherwise. We'd break the rules now doing so. If you create a page like that, we also got to put it up for deletation. Angel Emfrbl 08:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Warning

You recently deleted large amounts of discussion on the One Piece discussion pages and replaced it with your own... So:

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Wikipedia. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Come on... You should know better then this! Or at least fix the problem. Angel Emfrbl 22:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I already said it was an accident and apologized. So whatever. There was no point and need to do this. Gune 03:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Whether it was an accident or not, templates should not be used on established users. People who aren't new can be justifiably annoyed at receiving a message which starts with "Welcome to Wikipedia" and which tells them to "take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia." See Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. ElinorD (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sakura's love

She doesn't say ren'ai as I had originally heard. Looking into it closely, in episode 109, I believe Sakura says "Watashi wa… Watashi wa Sasuke-kun ga suki de suki de tamaranai!" It seems to literally mean extreme, unbearable fondness. It seems be be a common, round-about means of expressing some sort of love in Japanese. –Gunslinger47 18:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] One Piece

Just make sure you do the Straw Hats, Red-Haired Pirate, Blackbeard pirates, Whitebeard Pirates Baroque Works and Marines. They are the most important. I think you've got most already Anyone else, well their over and done with... We can do without them for a while. Monday is only tomorrow, so a lot of pics will disappear then. However some have already gone, I noted that Warpol pirates have lost theirs. Trouble is, once their tagged they can be lost any time.

That guy who tagged them is coming back round and retagging a few who haven't have a fair use on them, which suprises me. I was expecting him to be a guy who tags everything and then doesn't care. It suprises me he goes to the hassle most others like him don't bother with. Angel Emfrbl 08:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Things are slow right now... I don't think they need too much attention. Usually, if you want to help out its best to come round during information overloads (start of new arcs for example or when information is being given out like During Garp's visit in Water 7). Plus we have a steady amount of editors now. I'm almost invisible, having to do very little. I'm actually relieved since at last I'm getting round to other wikipedia articles for once.  :)

You're always welcomed to wonder round though. There are always odd tidys to do!  ;) Angel Emfrbl (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Note

Thatch was named after the real life Blackbeard, its in one of the SBSs for vol.49. It wasn't sourced (my bad). Angel Emfrbl (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't have a clue... Mentioning the villians defeated as something like "Their place in the world"" over "Their strength", but how... I can't come up with an idea on that. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 17:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Gilbert Gottfried has been put down as the voice actor of several characters in the FUNimation dub. I've taken notice of its latest placement, from now on whenever I see it on a characters VA section, its coming off. This can't be a fact anymore if he gets puts on any random character. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deletionists Strike

The guy nominating them is apparently worst (as hard to believe as it may seem) then TTN. We have no chance, TTN gave us half a chance to improve articles... This guy assess the articles and just ups them for deletetion. Our chances of keeping articles with TTN was 45% this guy only 15%.  :-/ Angel Emfrbl (talk) 22:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Its times like this that make my wish Justyn was around... At least, we had half a chance to recover with him. TTN pissed too many editors off, and the clock is ticking on several articles. We have just a couple of days to come up with something. Trouble is, the terms articles holds all the explas on things from the series. So far my best bet is the fact trivia isn't a crime and is a minor problem, which is not recommended but not a reason to delete. But its the other reasons that have me stuck outside of trivia. Ity isn't just a page of trivia... Its a list of things related to the series that without, no one will be able to 100% understand the series. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Completely fully aware of this... I prefer the dicussion ones, with this one, its a case of if the mod (or whatever wikipedia calls them) decides its bad, its going. Today I removed a template saying terms page was fringment of copyright of One Piece Online or something... Riiiight. I know for a fact when I edit a file I only take from the manga and anime itself. If two people read a sentance and copy it from the manga/anime, sure the information is going to be the same, or at least simulaire. Plus, a fan stie doesn't count as copywrite. We're talking about sites that carry a copywrite note on them, like a business company, with lawyers and registered logos and stuff like that. A fansite can't be copyrighted really... In fact, fan sites are infringments OF copyright. ¬_¬' Angel Emfrbl (talk) 07:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Well its gone, I tried to save it but forgot "Hold" tags exist. Basically the person who deleted it hasn't actually checked that it voilate the copyright thingy, which we didn't, now I'm arguing to get it back. Its still going to be AfDed reguardless, but there was no call for a CSD. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 07:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
It was CSD also, which means they can delete it anytime. Often its before anyone can see it to respond which is whjy I don't like CSDs, but I'll live with AfDs. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Well this guy isn't TTN, he isn't pressurizing me to stand by my guns. I'm going to let this guy put anything up for AfD... I don't think things can continue the way they do. Had it not been for all the previous problems on wikipedia, I'd be fighting this guy until the end. But I'm just a anti-vandal and stupid edit editor these days... If we had the host of reglaurs we once had, I'd join in to fight, but so far, its just you and me fighting this guy. What little chance do we have? Watching Justyn's efforts against TTN, it takes a long time to look for loop holes to defend these kind of things.
TTN was correct - the opening of the wikia should have seen these pages retire completely. Only the random IP adress fans are keeping them alive and half of them don't know how to edit correctly.
As you can imagine by my comments, I've long lost the will to defend the pages, its the wikipedia effect, I've been here for over years, long after all the other editors have left. I'm suprised I still check the pages every day.  :-/ Angel Emfrbl (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The full story on that site which claimed copyright:

That site has been an annoyance for a while now. The owners was on the wikia (I keep forgetting) and scraped the contents of an entire page claiming we copied them (edit summery: "Keep copying my site!"). This is why I'm not suprised to see them do this here, except this time they've got what they've wanted. At the time, I had been the one who entired most, if not all, of the contents of said page and I can say full well I didn't copy them. Well, the owner of the site is just using common knowledge... Which you can only write one way. You can only say so much on a subject...

Its like saying water is a clear liquid... Yes... Now describe it another way... Water is a transparent fluquid.... And another... It is a colourless substance. In the end, no matter what your still saying its something wet that has no colour. ¬_¬' Angel Emfrbl (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah there is a place, but its been so long since I've done any CSD or AfD stuff I've forgotten where it is. I shamefully hide in the corner on the matter, all I can tell you is that it exists somewhere. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Some articles I don't want us to loose... Some like that one aren't such a loss. But I don't know how to fight this guy, I really don't. I've resulted to just letting him and then sorting it out after he has left. I'm almost too afriad to edit the OP pages right now as you don't know when your editing will go to waste.  :-/ Angel Emfrbl (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay...can y'all at least call me gal already while slamming me back and forth? :P -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Lol, this isn't a hate fest against you Collectonian, we're just discussing possible, if any, ways around the AfDs.
Well, Gune and I are big editors on the OP pages, as I said on the list of character page in the merge section, whenever something like this is happens the fandom Vs wikipedia kicks in. Gune and I are two of the few reglaur editors left because most had enough of it and left. Gune and I just want to make everyone happy, I guess its our fault but you can't please everyone. To be honest Collectonian, I don't see how we can please everyone this time. Its just a case of letting wikipedia pages take their course. I can't fault you for this, its something I've known should have happened a long time ago, after I got over being a wikipedia noob.
That said, I'll sit back and try to come up with ways until the very end. But I'm not as creatative as some of our past arguers... And I'm useless with looking for loopholes. Theres been nothing big enough to tick me off this time round, just the CSD on the terms page which was lost for the wrong cause. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay, see if you can point this out to them and use it as a trumph card. I don't know what else to do, if you can stick by your guns you'll probaberly win. I don't know what to do, Justyn was our residental debater. I'll try to get hold of him, but all I can do is leave a note for him to read.  :-/ Angel Emfrbl (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay, sorry to do this, but your own your own now. I asked Justyn to lend a hand since I'm not any good at this and got accused of canvasing. Enough is enough. That was the straw that broke the camels back. Sorry about this, but that was the last bit of wikipedia hassle I can take. At least at the wikia I won't have my actions misread all the time and I get some work done. See you around. Angel Emfrbl (talk) 07:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Franky appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. You need to stop changing this page, and you need to stop now. It is disruptive and against Wikipedia guidelines. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)