Talk:Gulfstream III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Aviation Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated projects or task forces:

	Aircraft WikiProject

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military aviation task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

1 Old infobox
2 Requested move
- 2.1 Survey
  - 2.1.1 Survey - in support of the move
  - 2.1.2 Survey - in opposition to the move
- 2.2 Discussion

[edit] Old infobox

This article was tagged by WikiProject Aircraft as needing to be brought up to snuff. If the old spec sheet should need to be replaced, it is below. thadius856_talk 05:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC) I am commenting it out to save screen real estate. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

C-20 Gulfstream → Gulfstream III — use as basis for article covering all variants, similar to the work done on North American Sabreliner —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was that the page was moved as per request

[edit] Survey

Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

[edit] Survey - in support of the move

Support as nom. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Support As nominated. - BillCJ 20:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I hate to get political here, but which version of the C-20 is it that the Democrats (Pelosi) claim has a range of 2,000 miles? Every version I see has a range of well over 4,000 miles.