Guantanamo captives' appeals in Washington DC Courts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Guantananmo captives have been allowed to initiate appeals in Washington DC Courts since the passage of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA). The closed off the right of Guantanamo captives to submit new petitions of habeas corpus. It substituted a right to a limited appeal to Federal Courts of appeal in Washington DC.[1] The Act allowed captives to challenge whether their Combatant Status Review Tribunals had correctly followed the rules laid out by the Department of Defense.

After the passage of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) closed down the pending habeas corpus cases. Attorneys for the captives initiated both a challenge to the constitutionality of the MCA's stripping of the right to habeas corpus; and they started initiating the appeals in the DC Federal Courts of appeal allowed by the DTA.

[edit] Captives who are filing appeals in Federal Court

isn names case notes
968 Bismullah Bismullah v. Gates
  • Bismullah's case has been the subject of multiple filings as to the scope that captive's attorneys should be given to the material behind the summarized allegation.[2][3][4][5][6]
320 Hozaifa Parhat Parhat v. Gates

[edit] References

  1. ^ Carol D. Leonnig. "Detainee Evidence Probe Weighed: Judge Told Guantanamo Information May Have Been Destroyed", Washington Post, Saturday, December 22, 2007, pp. Page A02. Retrieved on 2008-01-06. 
  2. ^ Carol D. Leonnig. "Intelligence Chiefs Back A Guantanamo Reversal", Washington Post, Wednesday, September 12, 2007, p. A05. Retrieved on 2007-09-18. 
  3. ^ Lyle Denniston. "New developments on detainees", Scotusblog, Thursday, May 10, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-09-18. 
  4. ^ Lyle Denniston. "Government to seek Bismullah rehearing", Scotusblog, Saturday, September 1, 2007. Retrieved on 2007-09-18. 
  5. ^ Lyle Denniston. "U.S. mounts sweeping challenge to Circuit Court", Scotusblog, Friday, September 7, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-01-06. 
  6. ^ Lyle Denniston. "Government duty in detainee cases narrowed", Scotusblog, Wednesday, October 3, 2007. Retrieved on 2008-01-06.